Explore AI Agent Skills & Claude Prompts

Regenerate the [Unreleased] section of every affected CHANGELOG.md in Keep a Changelog style. Reads commits since the last release tag plus any uncommitted or staged changes, classifies them by Conventional Commit prefix, and rewrites each [Unreleased] block. Works in single-package repos and monorepos (one CHANGELOG.md per package). Use when preparing a release or drafting changelog entries. Idempotent — safe to re-run as work lands.

annotate-guidance

Generate architecture.md guidance files under .rpiv/guidance/ that document a project's architecture and patterns for AI assistants, written to a shadow tree alongside the source. Use when the user wants to onboard Claude, Cursor, or an AI agent to a codebase via the guidance system, document architecture, or asks to "annotate guidance". Prefer this over annotate-inline when the project uses the .rpiv/guidance/ shadow tree instead of inline CLAUDE.md files.

annotate-inline

Generate CLAUDE.md files placed inline next to source code across a project, documenting architecture and patterns for AI assistants. Use when the user wants to onboard Claude to a codebase via inline CLAUDE.md files, generate per-directory guidance, document architecture in-place, or asks to "annotate inline". Prefer this over annotate-guidance when CLAUDE.md should live alongside the code rather than in a shadow tree.

architecture-review

Conduct a top-down, layer-by-layer architecture review of a software module by reading every file in scope, running a uniform 10-dimension checklist per layer, and triaging each candidate finding through a structured developer checkpoint. Produces a phased polish plan in .rpiv/artifacts/architecture-reviews/ that blueprint can consume per phase. Language-agnostic — works on TypeScript, Java, .NET, Rust, Python, Go, or any other typed module. Use before a 1.0 release, after a major refactor, or when a module has grown enough to warrant a structural audit.

blueprint

Plan complex features by decomposing them into vertical slices (one slice equals one phase) with developer micro-checkpoints between phases, producing an implement-ready phased plan in .rpiv/artifacts/plans/. Use for complex multi-component features touching 6+ files across multiple layers when iterative review between slices is valuable. Optionally consumes a research/solutions artifact; can also run standalone with a free-text feature description for small tasks. Prefer blueprint over plan when mid-flight micro-checkpoints matter, and prefer plan when a straightforward phased breakdown is enough.

code-review

Conduct comprehensive code reviews of pending changes, a branch, or a PR using parallel specialist agents that audit the diff, compare against peer code, and verify claims. Use when the user asks to 'review this', wants pending changes, a PR, a branch, or a diff reviewed, or asks for a code review. Produces review documents in .rpiv/artifacts/reviews/. Internal mechanics like row-only agent contracts and Gap-Finder set arithmetic are documented in the skill body.

commit

Create structured git commits by analyzing staged and unstaged changes and grouping them logically into one or more commits with clear, descriptive messages. Use when the user asks to commit, says "commit this" or "commit my changes", wants help writing a commit message, or has finished a chunk of work that needs committing.

create-handoff

Create a context-preserving handoff document for session transitions, compacting the current task, decisions made, in-flight changes, and open questions into a single concise file so a fresh session can pick up where this one left off. Use when the user invokes /create-handoff, says context is getting large, asks to wrap up the session, or wants to hand off work to another session.

design

Design complex features by decomposing them into vertical slices, generating code slice-by-slice with per-slice verifier dispatch and post-finalization independent code review, and producing a design artifact (architecture decisions, slice breakdown, file map) in .rpiv/artifacts/designs/. The design feeds the plan or blueprint skill. Use for complex multi-component features touching 6+ files across multiple layers, when the user wants a feature designed before implementation. Requires a research artifact or a solutions artifact (from explore). Prefer design over plan or blueprint when the focus is architecture and decomposition rather than phased execution steps.

discover

Interview the developer one question at a time to extract feature intent and requirements, then synthesize into a Feature Requirements Document at .rpiv/artifacts/discover/. The first question is intent-only and runs before any codebase probe; subsequent questions ground in evidence the probe surfaces. Use as the canonical entry point of the pipeline before research, or to stress-test a feature idea before codebase discovery. The FRD's Decisions block is consumed by `research` and propagates through Developer Context into `design`.

explore

Analyze solution options for a feature or change, comparing approaches with pros, cons, trade-offs, and a recommended path. Use when the user is weighing approaches, asks "what are the options" or "how should we approach X", wants approaches compared, says "explore solutions", or faces a decision with multiple valid implementations. Produces solutions documents in .rpiv/artifacts/solutions/, which can feed the design skill.

frontend-design

Inject tailored visual design guidance for frontend work. Scope: web frontends (HTML/CSS/JS, React, Vue, Svelte, Astro, etc.). Aesthetic principles generalize to native/TUI but examples assume web. Use when the user asks to build a page, full layout, or new application, or explicitly wants design direction. SKIP for single-component requests in codebases with an established style system. The skill auto-adapts: empty scan → 2-question micro-interview; established system → scan-only injection; otherwise full 7-dimension checkpoint with skip logic.