interview-storytelling

star 3

Structures long-form interview storytelling for expert interviews, internal feature stories, and multi-expert roundups. Applies 5W1H question matrix, 3-part answer arc, verbal signposting, NNGroup 4-dimension voice profile, and quote-approval workflow. Use when user asks about interview article, expert interview, feature story, storytelling, quote roundup, 인터뷰 기사, 전문가 인터뷰, 스토리텔링, 인용 모음, or 피처 스토리.

Yoodaddy0311 By Yoodaddy0311 schedule Updated 4/23/2026

context: fork name: interview-storytelling description: "Structures long-form interview storytelling for expert interviews, internal feature stories, and multi-expert roundups. Applies 5W1H question matrix, 3-part answer arc, verbal signposting, NNGroup 4-dimension voice profile, and quote-approval workflow. Use when user asks about interview article, expert interview, feature story, storytelling, quote roundup, 인터뷰 기사, 전문가 인터뷰, 스토리텔링, 인용 모음, or 피처 스토리." platforms: [claude-code, gemini-cli, codex-cli, cursor] level: 3 triggers: - "interview article" - "expert interview" - "feature story" - "storytelling long-form" - "quote roundup" - "multi-expert article" - "인터뷰 기사" - "전문가 인터뷰" - "스토리텔링" - "인용 모음" - "피처 스토리" agents: - "content-marketer" - "doc-updater" tokens: "~4K" category: "marketing" depends_on: - copywriting suggests: - voice-reference - long-form-writing - ai-slop-reviewer

Interview Storytelling

When This Skill Applies

  • Producing a long-form article based on one or more interviews with named experts
  • Building an internal feature story about a team, program, or customer
  • Aggregating 3-5 expert quotes into a single roundup piece
  • Turning a podcast or webinar transcript into readable long-form content
  • Any brief where human voice and attributable quotes are the primary source material

Core Guidance

1. 5W1H Question Matrix

Before the interview, draft at least two questions per dimension. The matrix forces coverage of the full story surface.

Dimension Purpose Example Prompt Pattern
Why Motivation, cause, origin Why did [decision] happen when it did?
Who Stakeholders, audience, affected parties Who pushed for this, and who resisted?
What Concrete objects, outputs, artifacts What did the first version look like?
When Sequence, timing, triggers When did you realize the approach was wrong?
Where Context, environment, location Where in the workflow did this break first?
How Mechanism, method, process How did you actually measure that outcome?

During the interview, let Why and How questions run long. Who, What, When, and Where questions collect facts for verification.

2. Three-Part Answer Arc

Each spoken answer and each written passage built from that answer follows the same structure.

Part Duration (spoken) Word Count (written) Role
Hook 15-30 seconds 25-40 words One surprising or specific opening claim
Core 1.5-3 minutes 120-200 words The mechanism, evidence, or narrative detail
Close 15-30 seconds 25-40 words Stakes, implication, or forward-pointing line

When narrativizing, the arc applies at passage level. A 500-word section is three arcs stacked, not one long expansion.

3. Verbal Signposting

Signposts are short transition phrases that orient the reader between ideas. Use them sparingly; three to five per 1,000 words is a healthy density.

English Signpost Korean Equivalent When to Use
"The key insight here is..." "여기서 핵심은..." Flagging the single most important claim in a section
"Three things matter..." "중요한 건 세 가지입니다..." Opening an enumerated set
"Let me show you..." "예를 들어 보겠습니다..." Transitioning from abstract to concrete
"What this means in practice..." "실제로 이게 뜻하는 바는..." Bridging principle to application
"The counterintuitive part..." "의외인 부분은..." Introducing a finding that contradicts expectation

Avoid signposts that announce without delivering ("I want to talk about..."). Every signpost should be followed immediately by the content it points at.

4. NNGroup 4-Dimension Voice Profile

The Nielsen Norman Group defines brand voice along four independent axes. Each interview subject and each article section should place on the axes consciously, not by default.

Axis Anchor A Anchor B
Humor Funny Serious
Formality Formal Casual
Respect Respectful Irreverent
Enthusiasm Enthusiastic Matter-of-fact

Humor axis: A funny tone uses wordplay, surprise, and light self-deprecation. A serious tone does not. Funny sample: "We built the worst possible version first, on purpose." Serious sample: "The initial build was deliberately minimal."

Formality axis: Formal uses full terms, complete sentences, and few contractions. Casual uses contractions, sentence fragments, and colloquial phrasing. Formal sample: "The migration occurred over six weeks." Casual sample: "The migration took about six weeks, give or take."

Respect axis: Respectful avoids sarcasm and assumes the reader's good faith. Irreverent challenges the reader, pokes at sacred cows, may use mild provocation. Respectful sample: "Most teams underestimate the rollback plan." Irreverent sample: "Skip the rollback plan and you will learn humility quickly."

Enthusiasm axis: Enthusiastic uses emphatic word choices and exclamation-free excitement. Matter-of-fact uses neutral verbs and lets the data carry the weight. Enthusiastic sample: "The jump in retention floored us." Matter-of-fact sample: "Retention rose 14 points in the quarter."

Subject Type Common Voice Profile
Senior engineer Serious / Formal / Respectful / Matter-of-fact
Founder or exec Serious / Casual / Irreverent / Enthusiastic
Designer or creative Funny / Casual / Respectful / Enthusiastic
Analyst or researcher Serious / Formal / Respectful / Matter-of-fact

5. Quote Approval Workflow

Three stages, each with a named artifact. Never skip stage 2.

Stage Action Artifact
1 Record the interview or collect written responses Transcript or written submission
2 Send summary and selected quotes to subject; request edits Summary email with quote list
3 Obtain explicit public-use consent before publish Written approval on file

Stage 2 email core: "Attached is my summary of our conversation and the quotes I plan to use. Please edit anything that misrepresents what you meant. Reply with 'approved' once the quotes are accurate. Silence is not approval."

Publish blockers — hold the piece until all three are true:

  • Subject has seen the full summary, not just the quotes in isolation
  • Every quote attributed to the subject has been edited or confirmed verbatim
  • Public use on the named channels has explicit written consent

6. Multi-Expert Roundup Mode

When a single article pulls quotes from 3-5 named experts on one topic, the structure changes.

Element Roundup Approach
Opening Frame the question that all experts answered
Expert block Short bio line, 2-3 sentence quote, one follow-up insight per expert
Synthesis Writer's own 150-200 word paragraph connecting the quotes
Points of disagreement Surface explicitly; do not smooth over contradictions
Closing Forward-looking question for the reader, not a summary

Expert block template:

### [Expert Name], [Title], [Company]

[25-40 word bio line establishing relevance to the question]

"[Direct quote, 40-80 words, edited for grammar with subject approval]"

[Writer's 30-60 word framing of why this quote matters in the context of the roundup]

7. Working From Transcripts

Transcript Problem Treatment
Verbal tics ("um", "you know", "like") Remove silently; disclose editing policy once in article footer
Sentence restarts Keep the intended sentence, drop the abandoned start
Ambiguous pronouns Replace with the noun the subject meant, confirm in stage 2 email
Factual errors Flag to subject; do not print without correction
Off-record comments Exclude entirely; separate list kept by interviewer

Output Format

INTERVIEW STORY PACKAGE
=======================
Title:          [article headline]
Mode:           [single-subject | multi-expert roundup]
Subjects:       [names and titles]
Word Count:     [target]
Voice profile:  [humor / formality / respect / enthusiasm placement]

QUESTION MATRIX
───────────────
| Dimension | Q#1 | Q#2 |
|-----------|-----|-----|
| Why       |     |     |
| Who       |     |     |
| What      |     |     |
| When      |     |     |
| Where     |     |     |
| How       |     |     |

APPROVAL STATUS
───────────────
| Subject | Stage 1 (transcript) | Stage 2 (summary sent) | Stage 3 (public-use consent) |
|---------|---------------------|------------------------|------------------------------|
| [name]  | [yes/no]            | [date]                 | [yes/no]                     |

VOICE PROFILE
─────────────
| Axis        | Placement         |
|-------------|-------------------|
| Humor       | Funny / Serious   |
| Formality   | Formal / Casual   |
| Respect     | Respectful / Irreverent |
| Enthusiasm  | Enthusiastic / Matter-of-fact |

Quick Reference

Question matrix: 2 questions per 5W1H dimension Answer arc: Hook (25-40w) -> Core (120-200w) -> Close (25-40w) Signposts: 3-5 per 1,000 words, always followed by content Voice axes: Humor, Formality, Respect, Enthusiasm (NNGroup 4-dim) Approval stages: Transcript -> Summary review -> Public-use consent Roundup: 3-5 experts, synthesis paragraph, surface disagreement Transcript cleanup: Silent for tics, disclosed in footer


References

  • See ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../copywriting/references/anti-ai-writing.md for voice-related slop patterns that flatten expert quotes
Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/Yoodaddy0311/artibot --skill interview-storytelling
Repository Details
star Stars 3
call_split Forks 1
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator
Yoodaddy0311
Yoodaddy0311 Explore all skills →