name: verify license: MIT compatibility: "Claude Code 2.1.170+. Requires memory MCP server." description: "Comprehensive verification using parallel test agents for unit tests, integration tests, E2E validation, security scanning, and type checking. Runs coverage analysis, detects regressions, and validates against project conventions. Reports pass/fail with detailed findings and coverage deltas. Use when verifying implementations, validating changes after /ork:implement, or running pre-merge quality gates." argument-hint: "[feature-or-scope]" context: fork version: 4.3.0 author: OrchestKit tags: [verification, testing, quality, validation, parallel-agents, grading] user-invocable: true allowed-tools: [AskUserQuestion, Bash, Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Task, TaskCreate, TaskUpdate, TaskList, TaskStop, mcp__memory__search_nodes, mcp__agentation__agentation_get_all_pending, mcp__agentation__agentation_acknowledge, mcp__agentation__agentation_resolve, mcp__agentation__agentation_watch_annotations, ToolSearch, CronCreate, CronDelete, Monitor, PushNotification] skills: [code-review-playbook, testing-unit, testing-e2e, testing-llm, testing-integration, testing-perf, memory, quality-gates, chain-patterns, browser-tools] complexity: high persuasion-type: discipline effort: high model: sonnet hooks: PreToolUse: - matcher: "Bash" command: "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/bin/run-hook.mjs skill/test-framework-detector" once: true - matcher: "Agent" command: "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/bin/run-hook.mjs skill/verify-scoring-rubric-loader" once: true metadata: category: workflow-automation mcp-server: memory triggers: keywords: [verify, verifiy, validate, verification, "ready for merge", "check everything", "security scan", "give me a score", "full verification", "grade my"] examples: - "verify the authentication implementation" - "is this feature ready for merge? check everything" - "run tests, security scan, and give me a score"
anti-triggers: [implement, build, fix, cover, "generate tests", commit]
Verify Feature
Comprehensive verification using parallel specialized agents with nuanced grading (0-10 scale) and improvement suggestions.
Quick Start
/ork:verify authentication flow
/ork:verify --model=opus user profile feature
/ork:verify --scope=backend database migrations
Argument Resolution
SCOPE = "$ARGUMENTS" # Full argument string, e.g., "authentication flow"
SCOPE_TOKEN = "$ARGUMENTS[0]" # First token for flag detection (e.g., "--scope=backend")
# $ARGUMENTS[0], $ARGUMENTS[1] etc. for indexed access (CC 2.1.59)
# Model override detection (CC 2.1.72)
MODEL_OVERRIDE = None
for token in "$ARGUMENTS".split():
if token.startswith("--model="):
MODEL_OVERRIDE = token.split("=", 1)[1] # "opus", "sonnet", "haiku"
SCOPE = SCOPE.replace(token, "").strip()
Pass MODEL_OVERRIDE to all Agent() calls via model=MODEL_OVERRIDE when set. Accepts symbolic names (opus, sonnet, haiku) or full IDs (claude-opus-4-8) per CC 2.1.74.
Opus 4.8: Agents use native adaptive thinking (no MCP sequential-thinking needed); defaults to
higheffort (CC 2.1.154+). Extended 128K output supports comprehensive verification reports.
STEP 0: Effort-Aware Verification Scaling (CC 2.1.76)
Scale verification depth based on /effort level:
| Effort Level | Phases Run | Agents | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| low | Run tests only → pass/fail | 0 agents | Quick check |
| medium | Tests + code quality + security | 3 agents | Score + top issues |
| high (default) | All 8 phases + visual capture | 6-7 agents | Full report + grades |
| xhigh (Opus 4.8, CC 2.1.111+) | All 8 phases + additional cross-file pattern sweep + self-verification pass | 6-7 agents | Full report with uncertainty annotations |
Override: Explicit user selection (e.g., "Full verification") overrides
/effortdownscaling.
STEP 0a: Verify User Intent with AskUserQuestion
BEFORE creating tasks, clarify verification scope:
AskUserQuestion(
questions=[{
"question": "What scope for this verification?",
"header": "Scope",
"options": [
# multiSelect questions do not render previews (single-select only) — kept text-only
{"label": "Full verification (Recommended)", "description": "All tests + security + code quality + visual + grades"},
{"label": "Tests only", "description": "Run unit + integration + e2e tests"},
{"label": "Security & code quality", "description": "Security audit (OWASP/CVE/secrets) + lint/types/complexity"},
{"label": "Quick check", "description": "Just run tests, skip detailed analysis"}
],
"multiSelect": true
}]
)
Based on answer, adjust workflow:
- Full verification: All 10 phases (8 + 2.5 + 8.5), 7 parallel agents including visual capture
- Tests only: Skip phases 2 (security), 5 (UI/UX analysis)
- Security & code quality: Run security-auditor + code-quality-reviewer agents
- Quick check: Run tests only, skip grading and suggestions
STEP 0b: Select Orchestration Mode
Load details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/orchestration-mode.md") for env var check logic, Agent Teams vs Task Tool comparison, and mode selection rules.
Choose Agent Teams (mesh -- verifiers share findings) or Task tool (star -- all report to lead) based on the orchestration mode reference.
MCP Probe + Resume
# memory is alwaysLoad in .mcp.json (CC 2.1.121+, #1541) — probe below kept as fallback for older CC:
ToolSearch(query="select:mcp__memory__search_nodes")
Write(".claude/chain/capabilities.json", { memory, timestamp })
Read(".claude/chain/state.json") # resume if exists
Handoff File
After verification completes, write results:
Write(".claude/chain/verify-results.json", JSON.stringify({
"phase": "verify", "skill": "verify",
"timestamp": now(), "status": "completed",
"outputs": {
"tests_passed": N, "tests_failed": N,
"coverage": "87%", "security_scan": "clean"
}
}))
Regression Monitor (CC 2.1.71)
Optionally schedule post-verification monitoring:
# Guard: Skip cron in headless/CI (CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_CRON)
# if env CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_CRON is set, run a single check instead
CronCreate(
schedule="0 8 * * *",
prompt="Daily regression check: npm test.
If 7 consecutive passes → CronDelete.
If failures → alert with details."
)
Task Management (CC 2.1.16)
# 1. Create main verification task
TaskCreate(
subject="Verify [feature-name] implementation",
description="Comprehensive verification with nuanced grading",
activeForm="Verifying [feature-name] implementation"
)
# 2. Create subtasks for 8-phase process
TaskCreate(subject="Run code quality checks", activeForm="Running quality checks") # id=2
TaskCreate(subject="Execute security audit", activeForm="Running security audit") # id=3
TaskCreate(subject="Verify test coverage", activeForm="Verifying test coverage") # id=4
TaskCreate(subject="Validate API", activeForm="Validating API") # id=5
TaskCreate(subject="Check UI/UX", activeForm="Checking UI/UX") # id=6
TaskCreate(subject="Calculate grades", activeForm="Calculating grades") # id=7
TaskCreate(subject="Generate suggestions", activeForm="Generating suggestions") # id=8
TaskCreate(subject="Compile report", activeForm="Compiling report") # id=9
# 3. Set dependencies — phases 2-6 run in parallel, 7-9 are sequential
TaskUpdate(taskId="7", addBlockedBy=["2", "3", "4", "5", "6"]) # Grading needs all checks
TaskUpdate(taskId="8", addBlockedBy=["7"]) # Suggestions need grades
TaskUpdate(taskId="9", addBlockedBy=["8"]) # Report needs suggestions
# 4. Before starting each task, verify it's unblocked
task = TaskGet(taskId="2") # Verify blockedBy is empty
# 5. Update status as you progress
TaskUpdate(taskId="2", status="in_progress") # When starting
TaskUpdate(taskId="2", status="completed") # When done — repeat for each subtask
8-Phase Workflow
Load details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/verification-phases.md") for complete phase details, agent spawn definitions, Agent Teams alternative, and team teardown.
| Phase | Activities | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Context Gathering | Git diff, commit history | Changes summary |
| 2. Parallel Agent Dispatch | 6 agents evaluate | 0-10 scores |
| 2.5 Visual Capture | Screenshot routes, AI vision eval | Gallery + visual score |
| 3. Test Execution | Backend + frontend tests | Coverage data |
| 4. Nuanced Grading | Composite score calculation | Grade (A-F) |
| 5. Improvement Suggestions | Effort vs impact analysis | Prioritized list |
| 6. Alternative Comparison | Compare approaches (optional) | Recommendation |
| 7. Metrics Tracking | Trend analysis | Historical data |
| 8. Report Compilation | Evidence artifacts + gallery.html | Final report |
| 8.5 Agentation Loop | User annotates, ui-feedback fixes | Before/after diffs |
Phase 2 Agents (Quick Reference)
| Agent | Focus | Output |
|---|---|---|
| code-quality-reviewer | Lint, types, patterns | Quality 0-10 |
| security-auditor | OWASP, secrets, CVEs | Security 0-10 |
| test-generator | Coverage, test quality | Coverage 0-10 |
| backend-system-architect | API design, async | API 0-10 |
| frontend-ui-developer | React 19, Zod, a11y | UI 0-10 |
| python-performance-engineer | Latency, resources, scaling | Performance 0-10 |
Launch ALL agents in ONE message with run_in_background=True and max_turns=25.
Progressive Output (CC 2.1.76+)
Output each agent's score as soon as it completes — don't wait for all 6-7 agents.
Focus mode (CC 2.1.101): In focus mode, include the full composite score, all dimension scores, and the verdict in your final message — the user didn't see the incremental outputs.
Security: 8.2/10 — No critical vulnerabilities found
Code Quality: 7.5/10 — 3 complexity hotspots identified
[...remaining agents still running...]
This gives users real-time visibility into multi-agent verification. If any dimension scores below the security_minimum threshold (default 5.0), flag it as a blocker immediately — the user can terminate early without waiting for remaining agents.
Monitor + Partial Results (CC 2.1.98)
Use Monitor for streaming test execution output from background scripts:
# Stream test output in real-time instead of waiting for completion
Bash(command="npm test 2>&1", run_in_background=true)
Monitor(pid=test_task_id) # Each line → notification
Full pattern reference (when to use vs. TaskOutput, until-condition gates, anti-patterns): Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/chain-patterns/references/monitor-patterns.md").
Partial results (CC 2.1.98): If a verification agent fails mid-analysis, synthesize partial scores rather than re-spawning:
for agent_result in verification_results:
if "[PARTIAL RESULT]" in agent_result.output:
# Extract whatever scores the agent produced before crashing
partial_score = parse_score(agent_result.output) # May be incomplete
scores[agent_result.dimension] = {
"score": partial_score, "partial": True,
"note": "Agent crashed — score based on partial analysis"
}
# A 4-dimension score is better than no score. Do NOT re-spawn.
Phase 2.5: Visual Capture (NEW — runs in parallel with Phase 2)
Load details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/visual-capture.md") for auto-detection, route discovery, screenshot capture, and AI vision evaluation.
Summary: Auto-detects project framework, starts dev server, discovers routes, uses agent-browser to screenshot each route, evaluates with Claude vision, generates self-contained gallery.html with base64-embedded images.
Output: verification-output/{timestamp}/gallery.html — open in browser to see all screenshots with AI evaluations, scores, and annotation diffs.
Graceful degradation: If no frontend detected or server won't start, skips visual capture with a warning — never blocks verification.
Phase 8.5: Agentation Visual Feedback (opt-in)
Load details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/visual-capture.md") (Phase 8.5 section) for agentation loop workflow.
Trigger: Only when agentation MCP is configured. Offers user the choice to annotate the live UI. ui-feedback agent processes annotations, re-screenshots show before/after.
Grading & Scoring
Load Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/quality-gates/references/unified-scoring-framework.md") for dimensions, weights, grade thresholds, and improvement prioritization. Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/quality-model.md") for verify-specific extensions (Visual dimension). Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/grading-rubric.md") for per-agent scoring criteria.
Dimension-Level Blockers (ork-rubric/1.0)
Composite is necessary but not sufficient — a strong composite can average away a critical dimension. In Phase 4 (Nuanced Grading), read per-dimension thresholds from ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/rubric.json (schema: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/shared/rubric.schema.json): security min_blocker 4.0, compliance min_pass 6.0.
- ANY dimension below its
min_blocker→ verdict is BLOCKED regardless of composite. Report it explicitly:Security 3.2/10 (CRITICAL BLOCKER — below min_blocker 4.0). - A dimension below its
min_pass(but at/abovemin_blocker) caps the verdict at IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDED — it cannot grade READY FOR MERGE. - Blocked verdicts list every tripped dimension first, each with the fix needed to clear it.
- A project
.claude/policies/verification-policy.json(see Policy-as-Code) may tighten these thresholds, never loosen them below the rubric defaults.
Threshold bands and reporting format: references/grading-rubric.md ("Dimension-Level Blockers" section).
Evidence & Test Execution
Load details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/rules/evidence-collection.md") for git commands, test execution patterns, metrics tracking, and post-verification feedback.
Policy-as-Code
Load details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/policy-as-code.md") for configuration.
Define verification rules in .claude/policies/verification-policy.json:
{
"thresholds": {
"composite_minimum": 6.0,
"security_minimum": 7.0,
"coverage_minimum": 70
},
"blocking_rules": [
{"dimension": "security", "below": 5.0, "action": "block"}
]
}
Report Format
Load details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/report-template.md") for full format. Summary:
# Feature Verification Report
**Composite Score: [N.N]/10** (Grade: [LETTER])
## Verdict
**[READY FOR MERGE | IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDED | BLOCKED]**
Push notifications (CC 2.1.110+): Verify runs for >5 min are common on complex changes. When the final verdict is ready, call
PushNotificationto alert the user — they likely walked away from the terminal. Requires Remote Control with "Push when Claude decides" config; fails silently for users without it.PushNotification( message=f"ork:verify complete — {verdict} · {score}/10 · {blockers_count} blockers", status="proactive" )
References
Load on demand with Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/<file>"):
| File | Content |
|---|---|
verification-phases.md |
8-phase workflow, agent spawn definitions, Agent Teams mode |
visual-capture.md |
Phase 2.5 + 8.5: screenshot capture, AI vision, gallery generation, agentation loop |
quality-model.md |
Scoring dimensions and weights (8 unified) |
grading-rubric.md |
Per-agent scoring criteria |
report-template.md |
Full report format with visual evidence section |
alternative-comparison.md |
Approach comparison template |
orchestration-mode.md |
Agent Teams vs Task Tool |
policy-as-code.md |
Verification policy configuration |
verification-checklist.md |
Pre-flight checklist |
Rules
Load on demand with Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/rules/<file>"):
| File | Content |
|---|---|
scoring-rubric.md |
Composite scoring, grades, verdicts |
evidence-collection.md |
Evidence gathering and test patterns |
Verification Gate (Cross-Cutting)
Load Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/shared/rules/verification-gate.md") — the minimum 5-step gate that applies to ALL completion claims across all skills. This is non-negotiable: NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE.
Anti-Sycophancy Protocol
Load Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/shared/rules/anti-sycophancy.md") — all verification agents report findings directly without performative agreement. "Should be fine" is not evidence. "Tests pass (exit 0, 47/47)" is.
Agent Status Protocol
All verification agents MUST report using the standardized protocol: Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents/shared/status-protocol.md"). Never report DONE if concerns exist. Never silently produce work you're unsure about.
Agent Coordination
SendMessage (Cross-Agent Findings)
When a security agent finds a critical issue, share it with other verification agents:
SendMessage(to="test-generator", message="Security: SQL injection in user_service.py:88 — add parameterized query test")
SendMessage(to="code-quality-reviewer", message="Security finding at user_service.py:88 — flag in review")
Skill Chain
After verification, chain to commit if all gates pass:
TaskCreate(subject="Commit verified changes", activeForm="Committing")
TaskUpdate(taskId=commit_id, addBlockedBy=[verify_task_id])
# Then: /ork:commit
Session recovery (CC 2.1.108+): After idle periods or interruptions, use
/recapto restore conversational context alongside checkpoint-resume state. Enabled by default since CC 2.1.110 (even with telemetry disabled).
Related Skills
ork:implement- Full implementation with verificationork:review-pr- PR-specific verificationtesting-unit/testing-integration/testing-e2e- Test execution patternsork:quality-gates- Quality gate patternsbrowser-tools- Browser automation for visual capture
Version: 4.3.0 (June 2026) — Added progressive output for incremental agent scores