By name: multi-perspective-panel description: 'Strategy: Multi-stakeholder review panel — diverse expert perspectives evaluate artifact simultaneously, then synthesize through structured deliberation.' type: strategy tactics:
- perspective-rotation
dependencies:
tactics:
- stress-test-perspective-rotation sops:
- confidence-calibration
- debate-architect
- divergence-detection
- perspective-critic
Multi-Perspective Panel Strategy
Diverse expert panel evaluates artifact from multiple stakeholder viewpoints.
Method
- debate-architect selects relevant perspectives based on artifact domain
- Each perspective-critic evaluates from assigned stakeholder viewpoint
- divergence-detection maps agreement/disagreement landscape
- Panel deliberation: agents respond to each other's concerns
- confidence-calibration determines if consensus reached or irreconcilable
Budget Table
| Parameter | S | M | L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debate rounds | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| Participating agents | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Coverage dimensions | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| External evidence searches | 2 | 5 | 10 |
Orchestration
debate-architect → [select panel perspectives]
→ [parallel]: perspective-critic × N (independent evaluation)
→ divergence-detection (map landscape)
→ [deliberation rounds]:
perspective-critic responds to disagreements
→ divergence-detection → confidence-calibration
→ debate-transcript-analysis → verdict-synthesis
Subagents
- debate-architect (panel composition)
- perspective-critic × N (stakeholder evaluation)
- divergence-detection (agreement mapping)
- confidence-calibration (consensus detection)
Available Tactics
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
|---|---|
| stress-test-perspective-rotation | Tactic: Sequential perspective evaluation with divergence aggregation. Each agent evaluates from a distinct viewpoint, then disagreements are surfaced and resolved. |
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| confidence-calibration | Calibrates confidence scores based on debate progression. Determines whether to escalate, continue, or terminate based on cumulative evidence. |
| debate-architect | Designs debate structure based on artifact type — selects attack vectors, assigns perspectives, determines escalation ladder, and configures round parameters. |
| divergence-detection | Identifies agreement and disagreement patterns across multiple perspective evaluations. Maps consensus clusters and persistent divergence points. |
| perspective-critic | Evaluates artifact from a specific assigned perspective. Produces assessment grounded in that viewpoint's values, priorities, and expertise. |