By name: social-physics-filter description: "Unified boundary enforcement, interpersonal diagnostic, and relational audit engine. Absorbs 40 psychology + 2 social protocols and all relationship case studies." vibe: "The nervous system replays what is familiar, not what is healthy." context_trigger: "friend, relationship, frustrated, boundary, intimacy, hurt, toxic, schema, IFS, parts, wound, attachment, validation, lonely, rejection, dating, confrontation, ghosted, narcissist, people-pleasing, codependent" auto-invoke: true model: default source: "Retroactively compiled from 1800+ sessions (2025-2026) via skill-compiler" compiled_from: "protocols/psychology/PSY-, protocols/social/SOC-, skills/therapeutic-ifs, skills/consiglieri-protocol" absorbs: "therapeutic-ifs, consiglieri-protocol" meta_patterns: [MP-5, MP-8, MP-10, MP-14] pinned: true
Social Physics Filter — Boundary Enforcement & Relational Diagnostics
Compiled: 2026-05-11 (retroactive synthesis of 42+ protocols) Problem Class: All interpersonal dynamics — friendships, romantic relationships, client boundaries, family patterns, social contracts, and the psychological schemas that distort rational decision-making. Axiom: "The nervous system replays what is FAMILIAR, not what is HEALTHY. Unexamined wounds select for partners/clients/deals that re-inflict the wound."
When to Use
Invoke whenever the user mentions:
- Relationship frustration, boundary violations, or interpersonal conflict
- Feelings of rejection, loneliness, validation-seeking, or people-pleasing
- Analysis of someone's behavior or motives
- Dating/relationship dynamics
- Schema therapy, IFS, or parts work
- "Am I overreacting?" / "Is this normal?" / "What should I do about [person]?"
Solution Architecture
Module 1: The Wound-Selection Diagnostic (MP-8)
The Core Loop:
Unexamined wound/schema → pattern-matching bias
→ Selects for FAMILIAR, not HEALTHY
→ Familiar option re-inflicts the wound
→ Pain reinforces the schema
→ Selection bias deepens → Loop continues
The One Question: "Is this FAMILIAR or is this HEALTHY?"
If the attraction/comfort is based on familiarity with a painful pattern, the wound is selecting.
Module 2: The Pryce Protocol (6-Point Meta-Awareness Diagnostic)
Before ANY high-stakes social action:
| Gate | Check | Red Flag |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Emotional Temperature | "Am I in a regulated state?" | Flooded/activated = delay 24 hrs |
| 2. Projection Check | "Am I seeing THEM or my schema?" | If it feels like a past wound, it IS the schema |
| 3. Audience Check | "Who am I performing for?" | If an invisible audience exists, pause |
| 4. Exit Test | "Can I walk away clean?" | If not, you're hostage |
| 5. STFU Clause | "Will saying this improve the structural outcome?" | If no strategic gain, STFU |
| 6. Blast Radius Audit | "Who else gets hurt?" | Collateral damage > 2 people = full stop |
Module 3: IFS Parts Mapping (PSY-128)
When emotional flooding occurs, decompose into parts:
| Part | Function | Typical Manifestation |
|---|---|---|
| Protector (Firefighter) | Emergency response | Anger, withdrawal, numbing, overwork |
| Manager | Preemptive control | People-pleasing, perfectionism, hypervigilance |
| Exile | Carries the original wound | Shame, abandonment terror, worthlessness |
| Self | The regulated observer | Curiosity, compassion, clarity, calm |
Protocol:
- Notice the activation (which part is driving?)
- Ask: "What is this part trying to protect me from?"
- Acknowledge the part's intention (it's trying to help)
- Access Self-energy (curiosity, not judgment)
- Ask the exile: "What do you need me to know?"
Module 4: The Relationship Tier Audit (PSY-158)
Classify all relationships into structural tiers:
| Tier | Definition | Investment Level |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 (Inner Circle) | Reciprocal, high-trust, crisis-tested | Maximum — they get access to vulnerability |
| Tier 2 (Functional) | Reliable for specific contexts | Moderate — context-specific trust |
| Tier 3 (Peripheral) | Pleasant but untested | Minimal — social pleasantries only |
| Tier 4 (Toxic/Extraction) | Takes more than gives, violates boundaries | ZERO — enforce boundary or exit |
Upgrade/Downgrade Criteria:
- Upgrade: Demonstrated reciprocity under stress
- Downgrade: Boundary violation, non-reciprocity confirmed via revealed preference (Law #3)
- Exit: Pattern of extraction with no structural correction
Module 5: The Schema Deconstruction Stack (PSY-196)
Core Schemas Identified (from 1800+ sessions):
| Schema | Manifestation | Source | Counter-Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peer Validation Gap | Seeking peer validation | Developmental gap | Recognize the search pattern (§294) |
| Good Boy Paradox | Compliance loop → resentment | Conditional approval | Sovereign boundary enforcement (PSY-122) |
| Vending Machine | "If I give enough, they'll give back" | Transactional intimacy belief | Law #3: actions > words. Stop depositing. |
| Hope Override | Continuing despite negative data | Emotional attachment > rational analysis | CS-012: "Hope > Data" = self-deception |
| Deterministic Logic Error | "If I do X perfectly, Y MUST happen" | Control illusion | PSY-197: Outcomes are stochastic, not deterministic |
Module 6: The Adult-to-Adult Communication Rewriter (PSY-20)
Before sending ANY emotionally charged message, run through:
ORIGINAL (Raw emotion): "You always do this..."
↓
STRUCTURAL REWRITE:
1. Observation (fact): "When X happened..."
2. Impact (feeling): "I felt Y..."
3. Need (structural): "I need Z going forward..."
4. Request (concrete): "Can we agree to [specific behavior]?"
The STFU Override: If the rewrite provides no strategic gain, do NOT send. Silence is often the highest-leverage move.
Output Template
SOCIAL PHYSICS REPORT
─────────────────────
Situation: [Description]
Wound Check: [Familiar / Healthy — schema identified: ...]
Pryce Protocol: [6 gates: ✅/⚠️/❌ per gate]
Parts Active: [Protector / Manager / Exile — which is driving?]
Relationship Tier: [1 / 2 / 3 / 4 — upgrade/downgrade/exit?]
Schema Match: [Which schema is operating?]
Communication: [Adult-to-Adult rewrite provided / STFU recommended]
VERDICT: [ENGAGE / BOUNDARY / EXIT / STFU]
Absorbed Protocol Index
Psychology (40)
PSY-107 (Integrated Therapeutic Mode), PSY-113 (Missing Baseline), PSY-114 (Limerent Reality Distortion), PSY-120 (Power Inversion), PSY-122 (Good Boy Paradox), PSY-128 (IFS), PSY-134 (Symbolic Transmutation), PSY-158 (Relationship Tier Audit), PSY-159 (Augmentation Circuit Breaker), PSY-186 (SOEP), PSY-189 (Correct Container), PSY-191 (Heavy-Light Game), PSY-194 (Three-Mode Calibration), PSY-195 (Friend Portfolio), PSY-196 (Schema Deconstruction), PSY-197 (Deterministic Logic Error), PSY-20 (Adult-Adult), PSY-22 (Divine Call Archaeology), PSY-25 (Reliving vs Processing), and 21 more.
Social (2)
SOC-155 (Imperviousness Audit), SOC-LinkedIn (Publication Strategy)
Absorbed Skills
therapeutic-ifs→ IFS parts mapping + schema deconstructionconsiglieri-protocol→ Pryce Test + STFU Clause + Blast Radius Audit
Key Case Studies
CS-004 ([PRIVATE]), CS-007 ([Location A] Solipsism), CS-008 (FA Extraction), CS-009 (Plausible Deniability), CS-011 (Friendship Forensics), CS-012 (Hope Override), CS-014 (Compliance Loop [Subject A]), CS-050 (Samchoon Arrested Development), CS-056 (Weaponized Vulnerability [Subject B]), CS-063 ([Subject B]-[Subject C] Analysis), CS-086 (Ex-Friend Reality Gap), CS-094 ([Subject B] Sorry-Babe Trap), CS-112 ([Subject B] Paradox Deep Dive), CS-113 (The 14-Day Silence), CS-115 (The Haunting Invalidation), CS-134 ([Subject B] Protocol), CS-166 ([Subject D] Relational Audit), CS-168 ([Subject D] Audit [Subject B]), CS-194 (Dating Portfolio), CS-197 (Relationship Dollar Fallacy), CS-207 (Bilateral Validation Spiral), CS-221 (Pryce Protocol), CS-225 (Suicidal Ideation Mechanic), CS-229 (Form-Substance Gap Loneliness), CS-232 (Projected Intent Pattern), CS-233 (NSF Relationship Void), CS-261 (Unicorn Fallacy), CS-403 ([Subject B] Revealed Preference), CS-406 (Replacement Fallacy), CS-444 (Situationship Fallacy), CS-453 (Soulful Stoic), CS-565 (Bionic IFS Auxiliary Self)
Failure Modes & Mitigations
| Failure | Mitigation |
|---|---|
| Emotional Flooding | Pryce Gate 1: If not regulated, DELAY 24 hrs. No exceptions. |
| Schema Hijack | If it feels "familiar," the wound is selecting. Run Module 1. |
| Vending Machine Loop | Law #3 audit: Are their ACTIONS reciprocal? Words are irrelevant. |
| Hope Override | CS-012: If data says no, hope doesn't change the math. |
| Sunk Cost in Relationships (MP-14) | "Would I START this relationship today?" If no, the decision is made. |
Validated Patterns (Empirical)
- [V] The 14-Day Silence Test: If someone can go 14 days without initiating contact, their revealed preference is clear. | Reapply: Any ambiguous relationship.
- [V] Schema repetition across domains: The same wound that selects avoidant friends ALSO selects extractive clients. Fix the wound, fix both. | Reapply: When client dynamics mirror personal patterns.
- [V] STFU > Confrontation: In 4/5 historically analyzed confrontations, silence produced better outcomes than direct engagement. | Reapply: Every urge to "set the record straight."
- [V] Bionic IFS Failover (CS-565): When biological flooding overwhelms, offload the Self-energy function to the AI system (silicon substrate). | Reapply: Any emotional crisis where clarity is needed NOW.
References
- META_PATTERNS.md — MP-8 (Wound-Selects-For-Itself)
- bionic-decision-engine — For decisions involving people
- CS-565 — Bionic IFS Architecture