name: prospect-researcher description: > This skill should be used when the user asks to "research this company", "look into this person", "find the best angle for reaching out to", "who should I contact at [company]", "what does [company] care about", or when preparing outreach to a specific target. Also triggered by "help me prepare for an interview with [company]" or "I want to apply to [company]". Combines lead-generation intelligence with LinkedIn-specific approach planning. consumer: cc_foreground, cc_background_task phase: 8 skill_type: uplift
Prospect Researcher
Purpose
Research a target company or person deeply enough to craft outreach that demonstrates genuine understanding — not generic "I saw your profile and thought we'd be a great fit." Produce actionable intelligence: what they care about, what problems they face, what angle gives the user the best chance of a meaningful response.
Relationship to Other Skills
This skill does the RESEARCH. Other skills use its output:
linkedin-dm-outreach— Uses findings to write personalized messageslead-generation— May trigger this for deep enrichment on hot leadslinkedin-post-writer— May inform commentary posts about the target's spaceosint— Can be invoked for deeper investigation on high-value targets
Research Process
Phase 1: Target Identification
Clarify who and what to research:
target:
type: <company | person | both>
company_name: <if known>
person_name: <if known>
person_role: <if known or "find the right person">
goal: <job_search | client_outreach | networking | partnership | interview_prep>
user_offering: |
<what the user brings to the table — skills, experience, services>
If the user says "find the right person at [company]," determine the right contact based on the user's goal:
- Job search → hiring manager for the relevant team, not HR
- Client outreach → decision-maker for the budget area
- Partnership → someone with strategic authority
- Interview prep → the interviewer(s) if known, otherwise the team lead
Phase 2: Company Intelligence
Gather structured information about the target company:
Public sources (search in this order):
- Company website — about page, careers, blog, press releases
site:linkedin.com/company/[name]— company page, employee count, posts- Recent news — funding, launches, acquisitions, leadership changes
- Job postings — what roles are they hiring for? (reveals priorities)
- Tech stack —
site:stackshare.com,site:builtwith.com, job posting requirements - Competitors — who they compete with, how they differentiate
- Industry reports or analyst coverage if available
Synthesize into:
company_intel:
summary: <what the company does, in plain language>
size: <employee count range>
stage: <startup | growth | enterprise>
recent_news:
- <significant recent events>
current_priorities: |
<what they appear to be focused on, based on hiring/news/content>
tech_stack:
- <confirmed technologies>
challenges: |
<inferred pain points based on hiring patterns, industry context>
culture_signals: |
<what their content and careers page reveal about values/culture>
Phase 3: Person Intelligence
If researching a specific person:
Public sources:
"[name]" "[company]" site:linkedin.com— profile summary, experience- Their LinkedIn posts and articles — what they write about, what they care about
- Conference talks, podcasts, interviews —
"[name]" (talk OR podcast OR interview) - Published articles or blog posts
- GitHub or technical contributions if relevant
Synthesize into:
person_intel:
name: <full name>
role: <current title>
tenure: <how long at current company>
background: |
<career trajectory — where they came from, pattern of roles>
interests: |
<what they post/talk about, what they care about professionally>
communication_style: |
<how they write — formal/casual, technical/business, verbose/concise>
connection_points:
- <shared interests, experiences, connections with the user>
recent_activity: |
<their most recent posts or public activity>
Phase 4: Angle Analysis
The most valuable output. Based on company intel, person intel, and the user's goal, identify the best approach:
approach_analysis:
primary_angle: |
<the single strongest reason this person should respond to the user>
supporting_angles:
- <backup angle if primary doesn't resonate>
- <additional angle>
connection_points:
- <specific shared elements — technologies, industries, challenges>
timing_factors: |
<why reaching out NOW is relevant — recent news, hiring, etc.>
what_to_avoid: |
<approaches that would likely backfire with this person>
recommended_channel: <linkedin_dm | email | mutual_introduction | event>
recommended_message_type: <connection_request | inmail | first_message>
confidence: <high | medium | low>
confidence_reasoning: |
<why we're confident or not in this approach>
Phase 5: Report
Combine all findings into a structured report. If Genesis is running this proactively (background task), stage the report for user review.
Compliance
- Use only publicly available information
- Do not scrape LinkedIn profiles (use search engine results)
- Do not bypass login walls or use API access without authorization
- Do not store personal data beyond what's needed for the outreach
- Flag if research reveals the person appears to be unreachable or not interested in being contacted (no public activity, minimal profile)
Output Format
# Prospect Research: [Target Name/Company]
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Goal:** [user's stated goal]
**Confidence:** [high | medium | low]
## Company Overview
[company_intel summary]
## Contact: [Person Name]
[person_intel summary]
## Recommended Approach
**Primary angle:** [primary_angle]
**Channel:** [recommended_channel]
**Timing:** [timing_factors]
## What to Avoid
[what_to_avoid]
## Raw Intelligence
[Full yaml blocks for reference]
## Suggested Next Steps
- [Concrete action items — e.g., "Draft connection request using X angle"]
- [Follow-up research if needed]
References
references/research-sources.md— Detailed source hierarchy and search patterns../linkedin-dm-outreach/SKILL.md— Uses findings for message drafting../lead-generation/SKILL.md— Broader prospecting pipeline../osint/SKILL.md— Deep investigation capability