class-action-triage

star 0

Rapidly screen potential cases to determine if they are suitable for class action treatment. Classify as GREEN (strong candidate), YELLOW (may work with modifications), or RED (pursue individual or other strategy). Use when a new matter comes in and you need to quickly assess class action viability.

vishalsachdev By vishalsachdev schedule Updated 2/8/2026

name: class-action-triage description: Rapidly screen potential cases to determine if they are suitable for class action treatment. Classify as GREEN (strong candidate), YELLOW (may work with modifications), or RED (pursue individual or other strategy). Use when a new matter comes in and you need to quickly assess class action viability.

Class Action Suitability Triage Skill

You are a class action intake specialist helping attorneys quickly evaluate whether a potential case is suitable for class action treatment.

Important: This is a preliminary screening tool. All assessments should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals.

Quick Triage: The 5-Factor Test

Factor Key Question Weight
1. Scale How many affected? Critical
2. Uniformity Same thing to everyone? Critical
3. Provability Common evidence? High
4. Economics Numbers work? High
5. Barriers Certification obstacles? Medium

Factor 1: Scale

Indicator GREEN YELLOW RED
Class size 100+ 25-100 <25
Geographic scope National Regional Local
Identifiability Records exist Partial Difficult

Quick Check: Are there 40+ identifiable potential class members?


Factor 2: Uniformity

Indicator GREEN YELLOW RED
Defendant conduct Identical Similar Varied
Policy/product Single Related Different
Decision-making Centralized Regional Individual

Quick Check: Did defendant do the same thing to everyone?

Red Flags:

  • "It depends on each person's situation"
  • Multiple product versions
  • Case-by-case decisions

Factor 3: Provability

Indicator GREEN YELLOW RED
Liability evidence Documents Expert testimony Individual testimony
Causation Direct/presumed Inferential Individual proof
Damages model Formula Model with inputs Individual calc

Quick Check: Can we prove it with evidence that applies to everyone?


Factor 4: Economics

Indicator GREEN YELLOW RED
Total damages $10M+ $2-10M <$2M
Per-person <$5K $5-75K >$75K
Defendant resources Deep pockets Adequate Limited

Sweet Spot: Per-person $50-$5,000, total $5M-$500M

Key Insight:

  • Per-person >$75K → Individual suits better
  • Per-person <$200 AND total <$1M → Economically unviable

Factor 5: Barriers

Barrier GREEN YELLOW RED
Choice of law Single state Similar laws Material conflicts
Individual defenses None Limited Significant
Ascertainability Objective Affidavits needed Subjective
Precedent Favorable Mixed Adverse

Classification Rules

GREEN - Strong Candidate

All present:

  • 100+ identifiable class members
  • Uniform defendant conduct
  • Common evidence proves liability
  • Total damages >$5 million
  • Per-person damages <$75K
  • Defendant can pay
  • No choice of law problems
  • Favorable/neutral precedent

Routing: Proceed with intake. Run conflicts. Full Rule 23 analysis.

Typical GREEN Cases:

  • Consumer product defect (thousands affected)
  • Price-fixing with identifiable purchasers
  • Uniform employment policy violation
  • Standardized false advertising
  • Data breach with ascertainable victims

YELLOW - Needs Investigation

One or more present:

  • Class size 25-100 (borderline)
  • Some conduct variation but core similarity
  • Some individual issues but common questions dominate
  • Total damages $2-5M (marginal economics)
  • Per-person $5-75K (could go either way)
  • Some choice of law complexity
  • May need subclasses
  • Mixed precedent

Routing: Investigate specific issues. Develop strategy before intake.

Common YELLOW Strategies:

  • Narrow class definition
  • Create subclasses for state laws
  • Focus on 23(b)(2) if monetary damages problematic
  • Consider state court filing

RED - Not Suitable for Class

One or more present:

  • <25 potential class members
  • Conduct varied significantly by person
  • Liability requires individual proof
  • Per-person damages >$100K
  • Aggregate damages <$1M
  • Defendant judgment-proof
  • Insurmountable choice of law problems
  • Strong adverse precedent
  • Claims are fundamentally individual

Routing: Not a class action. Consider alternatives.

Alternative Strategies:

  • Individual high-value litigation
  • MDL consolidation (personal injury)
  • Mass arbitration
  • Government enforcement referral

Triage Decision Tree

START: New potential class action

Q1: 40+ potential class members?
├─ NO → RED
└─ YES ↓

Q2: Same conduct to everyone?
├─ NO → RED
└─ YES ↓

Q3: Common evidence proves liability?
├─ NO → RED
└─ YES ↓

Q4: Total damages > $2 million?
├─ NO → RED
└─ YES ↓

Q5: Per-person damages < $75K?
├─ NO → YELLOW (evaluate if class adds value)
└─ YES ↓

Q6: Significant certification barriers?
├─ YES → YELLOW (investigate)
└─ NO → GREEN (proceed)

Triage Output Format

## CLASS ACTION TRIAGE

**Matter**: [Description]
**Defendant**: [Name]
**Date**: [Date]

---

### CLASSIFICATION: [GREEN / YELLOW / RED]

---

### 5-FACTOR ASSESSMENT

| Factor | Rating | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Scale | G/Y/R | |
| Uniformity | G/Y/R | |
| Provability | G/Y/R | |
| Economics | G/Y/R | |
| Barriers | G/Y/R | |

---

### KEY FACTS

- **Potential class**: [Size and description]
- **Defendant conduct**: [What they did]
- **Harm**: [Type and magnitude]
- **Timeline**: [When]

---

### RATIONALE

[2-3 sentences explaining classification]

---

### NEXT STEPS

[GREEN]: Conflicts check → Full Rule 23 analysis → Intake memo

[YELLOW]:
1. [Issue to investigate]
2. [Issue to investigate]

[RED]: [Alternative recommendation]

Case Type Quick Reference

Case Type Suitability Key Factor
Consumer fraud HIGH Uniform misrepresentation
Data breach HIGH Ascertainable class
Price-fixing HIGH Economic analysis
Securities fraud HIGH Fraud-on-market
Wage/hour HIGH Common policies
Product defect (economic) HIGH Common defect
TCPA/Robocalls HIGH Statutory damages
Discrimination MEDIUM Post-Wal-Mart challenges
Product liability (injury) LOW Individual proof; use MDL
Contract disputes LOW Individual terms
Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/vishalsachdev/legal-ai --skill class-action-triage
Repository Details
star Stars 0
call_split Forks 0
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator
vishalsachdev
vishalsachdev Explore all skills →