By name: study-eval-electronics description: > Evaluate electronics papers for competing claims about circuit architecture, signal integrity, and reliability. Scores across High Frequency, Low Frequency, and DC contexts. allowed-tools: Read, Bash(python3 *) argument-hint: [path-to-pdf]
Electronics Circuit Architecture Study Evaluation
Evaluate electronics research papers against an 18-factor circuit architecture glossary.
Domain: Electronic Circuit Architecture
Evaluates circuit architecture papers by scoring evidence across:
Contexts
- HF (High Frequency): Operation above 1 MHz — RF, switching noise, parasitic effects dominate
- LF (Low Frequency): Operation below 1 MHz — baseband signals, low-frequency noise, thermal effects
- DC (DC Steady State): Static operating point analysis — bias conditions, quiescent current, voltage regulation
Theory Groups
- G1 — Power Architecture (6 factors): Power delivery network design, voltage regulation, energy efficiency
- G2 — Signal Integrity (7 factors): Signal quality, impedance matching, crosstalk, noise performance
- G3 — Reliability (5 factors): Thermal management, aging effects, fault tolerance
Study Types
- Simulation: SPICE, FEM, or other simulation-based studies
- Bench Test: Laboratory measurements on physical hardware
- Field Data: Data collected from deployed systems
- Analytical: Mathematical/theoretical analysis
Output Format
hf_evaluations = {"Impedance Matching": 0.8, ...}
lf_evaluations = {"Impedance Matching": 0.5, ...}
dc_evaluations = {"Voltage Regulation Accuracy": 0.9, ...}
first_author = "Smith"
publication_year = "2024"
study_type = "Simulation"
reasoning_log_text = """..."""
References
- Domain config:
domains/electronics_architecture.json - Framework docs:
.claude/skills/study-eval/SKILL.md