llm-wiki-audit-feedback-loop

name: llm-wiki-audit-feedback-loop description: >- Durable feedback loop for correcting llm-wiki pages without losing the correction to chat history. Use when (1) a human notices a wiki page is wrong, outdated, or contradicts a source, (2) processing the audit/ inbox of a domain wiki, (3) reviewing what feedback has been resolved vs deferred, (4) needing to leave a comment on a specific text range that survives line- number drift. Implements the anchored-text audit file pattern from lewislulu/llm-wiki-skill, adapted for workspace-hub's domain-wiki layout under /mnt/local-analysis/llm-wiki/wikis//. Extends the 5-op model (compile/ingest/query/lint) from research/llm-wiki with the missing audit op. Never silently delete feedback — rejected audits stay archived with rejection rationale. metadata: category: research related_skills: - research/llm-wiki - research/llm-wiki-page-shape-contract - research/llm-wiki-cadence-governance related_issues: - vamseeachanta/workspace-hub#2374 - vamseeachanta/workspace-hub#2392 references: - references/audit-file-format.md

llm-wiki audit / feedback loop

The wiki is AI-written; it is wrong sometimes. Sources are human-written; they contradict each other. Inline chat corrections evaporate when context compresses. The audit/ inbox is the durable correction surface — one file per comment, anchored to a text range, processed under one of four resolution states, and never silently deleted.

Pattern provenance: lewislulu/llm-wiki-skill audit-shared. Anchor algorithm choice (before/text/after window) is robust against line-number drift, which is what makes the file format usable across multiple editing surfaces (CLI, Obsidian plugin, web viewer if/when we build one).

When this skill applies

Directory layout

/mnt/local-analysis/llm-wiki/wikis/<domain>/
├── audit/                    ← open feedback inbox (one file per comment)
│   ├── 20260520-143022-mooring-mbl-calc-error.md
│   └── 20260520-151105-orcaflex-version-drift.md
├── audit/resolved/           ← processed feedback — NEVER deleted
│   ├── 20260519-091233-yaw-moment-citation-fixed.md
│   └── 20260519-093045-acoustic-impedance-rejected.md
└── log/
    └── 20260520.md           ← per-day operation log; every audit resolution logs here

audit/ lives inside the wiki domain so multiple domain wikis maintain independent inboxes. Cross-domain audits (rare) live under whichever domain's page the comment anchors to.

Audit file format (see references/audit-file-format.md for full spec)

---
id: 20260520-143022-mooring-mbl-calc-error
target: wikis/engineering/standards/dnv-os-e301.md
anchor_before: |
  ## Safety factor application
  
  The minimum breaking load (MBL) is reduced by the
anchor_text: |
  safety factor 1.67 for ULS conditions per
anchor_after: |
  table 4-2, row 3, before being compared against
  the calculated tension envelope.
severity: high                     # low | medium | high
action: revise                     # revise | remove | clarify | annotate-contradiction
filed_by: vamsee
filed_at: 2026-05-20T14:30:22-05:00
state: open                        # open | resolved
---

# Feedback

The DNV-OS-E301 2023 revision actually specifies 1.5 for ULS in
table 4-2 row 3, not 1.67. The 1.67 value is from the 2018 revision
(table 4-1, row 2) and should not apply to current calcs.

# Recommended action

Update the page to cite the 2023 revision's table 4-2 row 3
(safety factor = 1.5) and add an `## Edition history` section noting
the 2018 → 2023 change. The mooring_design.py citation registry
already points at the 2023 edition; the wiki is the only place still
referencing 1.67.

Frontmatter contract:

The four resolution states

Every audit lands in exactly one state. Never delete.

accept — apply the correction

1. Locate the exact range in the target file. Use the anchor_before / anchor_text / anchor_after window; line numbers may have drifted since the audit was filed.
2. Apply the correction. Bump the target page's updated: frontmatter date. Run cascade-update scan per llm-wiki-page-shape-contract Rule 5 — the fix may ripple to other pages.
3. Append a # Resolution section to the audit file:

   # Resolution
   
   2026-05-20 · accepted.
   Fixed safety factor from 1.67 to 1.5 per DNV-OS-E301 (2023) table 4-2
   row 3. Added Edition history section noting 2018 → 2023 change.
   Cascade-updated: wikis/engineering/concepts/mooring-safety-factors.md
   (referenced the old value).
   

4. Move file from audit/ to audit/resolved/. Filename unchanged.
5. Log in log/YYYYMMDD.md:

   ## [HH:MM] audit | resolved 20260520-143022-mooring-mbl-calc-error — accepted; fixed DNV-OS-E301 safety factor
   

partial — apply some, not all

Same as accept, but the resolution section explains what was applied and what was deferred. If the deferred portion needs follow-up, file a new audit referencing this one's id. Log line includes — partial.

reject — feedback declined

1. Do not modify the target file.
2. Append a # Resolution section with the rejection rationale:

   # Resolution
   
   2026-05-20 · rejected.
   The 1.67 value is correct for the legacy 2018 edition still cited by
   the upstream client's project basis-of-design (mkt-a project 2024-03).
   The wiki page documents the value as legacy and the citation explicitly
   notes the edition. Not a bug.
   

3. Move file from audit/ to audit/resolved/. Filename unchanged.
4. Log:

   ## [HH:MM] audit | resolved <id> — rejected; <one-line rationale>
   

Never delete rejected audits. Rejection history is valuable — it prevents the same feedback being re-filed by a different reviewer next month, and it documents the wiki's position on a contested point.

defer — needs more research

1. Do not modify the target file.
2. Add the open question to wikis/<domain>/CLAUDE.md under an "Open research questions" section (create if missing).
3. Append a # Resolution section noting the defer:

   # Resolution
   
   2026-05-20 · deferred.
   The 2023 revision text is paywalled; we cannot independently verify
   table 4-2 without the source document. Added to engineering wiki's
   open-questions list. Will re-process once we have the 2023 edition
   in `knowledge/wikis/engineering/wiki/standards/sources/`.
   

4. Leave the audit in audit/ (NOT audit/resolved/). Deferred audits remain open until upgraded to accept / partial / reject.
5. Log:

   ## [HH:MM] audit | deferred <id> — <reason>
   

Anchor-window resolution algorithm

When applying an audit's correction, the target file's line numbers may have drifted since the audit was filed. The before/text/after window makes the audit robust:

1. Search the target file for anchor_text (literal string match).
2. If exactly one match: verify the preceding ~3 lines match anchor_before and the following ~3 lines match anchor_after. If both match, apply.
3. If zero matches: the text was deleted or rewritten since the audit was filed. Re-read the audit body and either (a) find the equivalent new range, then apply, or (b) defer with reason "anchor text gone — need to re-locate intent".
4. If multiple matches: use anchor_before and anchor_after to disambiguate. If still ambiguous: defer with reason "ambiguous anchor".

This algorithm matches lewislulu's audit-shared/src/anchor.ts semantics. A future Python port should live at scripts/knowledge/audit_anchor.py when we have multiple audits to process programmatically.

Processing cadence

Anti-patterns

• Silently deleting audits — even rejected ones. Rejection history matters.
• Fixing the page without filing an audit when feedback came from a non-author. The audit records who flagged it and what was said — critical for traceability.
• Using audits for typo fixes — single-character fixes are noise; just edit in place and log normally. Audits are for substantive corrections.
• Filing an audit without an anchor window — the audit is unprocessable; the anchor IS the surface area for resolution.
• Resolving an audit by editing it instead of moving to resolved/ — leaves the inbox cluttered and breaks audit_review.py queries (when we build one).
• Cross-domain audits without explicit target paths — every audit is anchored to exactly one wiki page. If feedback spans multiple, file one audit per affected page and cross-reference via related: [<other-audit-id>] frontmatter.

Hand-off back to research/llm-wiki

# Open audits for a domain wiki
ls /mnt/local-analysis/llm-wiki/wikis/<domain>/audit/*.md 2>/dev/null

# After applying a fix:
git add wikis/<domain>/<target-page>.md \
        wikis/<domain>/audit/resolved/<audit-id>.md \
        wikis/<domain>/log/YYYYMMDD.md
git rm wikis/<domain>/audit/<audit-id>.md
git commit -m "wiki(<domain>): resolve audit <id> — <action>; <one-line>" \
  -- wikis/<domain>/<target-page>.md \
     wikis/<domain>/audit/resolved/<audit-id>.md \
     wikis/<domain>/log/YYYYMMDD.md

Pathspec form git commit -m "..." -- <files> per feedback_multi_agent_commit_serialization.

What this skill is NOT

• Not for in-chat one-off corrections that don't need to survive context loss
• Not for typo fixes — just edit in place
• Not a CLI tool — this is the file-format contract; a Python audit_review.py script can be built later when audit volume justifies it
• Not for non-wiki repos — audits target wiki pages specifically

Related must-fire rules

• feedback_attestation_enables_contradiction_detection — audit-driven contradictions are a defect class, not noise
• feedback_silent_verdict_flip_defect_class — standards-page audits should check section + edition, not just code_id
• feedback_n_night_blocker_promote_to_replan — if the same defect class keeps re-filing across audits, the underlying wiki structure may need a redesign, not another fix
• feedback_never_offer_to_self_label_plan_approved — high-severity audits proposing major restructure should route through a planned issue, not direct-apply
• feedback_subagent_write_phantom — if a subagent processes audits, main session verifies the audit/ → audit/resolved/ move actually happened on disk