name: v1-refactor description: Use when refactoring code for simplicity, removing duplication, or applying KISS/DRY/SOLID/YAGNI. Triggers on "refactor", "clean up code", "apply DRY". allowed-tools: - Bash - Read - Edit - Grep
KISS DRY SOLID YAGNI Refactor
Refactor selected files or the current diff only when behavior can be preserved and verified.
Use v1-simplify for a quick changed-diff cleanup pass. Use v1-deep-review when the right answer may require architecture or module-boundary feedback before editing.
Usage
Typical invocations:
- Claude Code:
/v1-refactor [file_or_pattern] - Codex: invoke
v1-refactorfrom the skills menu or use$v1-refactor [file_or_pattern]
Examples:
/v1-refactor # Refactor current diff
/v1-refactor src/core/*.py # Refactor specific files
In Codex, the slash examples below map directly to $v1-refactor ....
Principles Applied (In Order)
1. KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid)
- Flatten deeply nested control flow with guard clauses
- Remove unnecessary wrapper layers and pass-through indirections
- Replace complex boolean expressions with well-named predicates
- Prefer straightforward data flow over cleverness
- Split functions when one block owns multiple independent decisions, side effects, or output shapes
- Inline trivial abstractions that add indirection without reducing complexity
2. YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It)
- Remove dead/unreachable code, unused params/locals/imports/exports
- Delete speculative abstractions with single use and no near-term reuse
- Collapse configuration surface to what's actually used
- Keep public APIs stable (SKIP if removal risks breakage)
3. DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)
- Detect duplication: copy/paste blocks, repeated queries/hooks/effects
- Extract shared logic into small, well-named helpers
- Consolidate config/literals into constants
- Remove magic numbers/strings
- Keep helpers close to use-sites unless broadly reusable
4. SOLID
- Single Responsibility: One function/class = one reason to change
- Open/Closed: Prefer extension points over editing core logic (when warranted)
- Liskov Substitution: Subtypes uphold base contracts
- Interface Segregation: Break wide interfaces into focused ones
- Dependency Inversion: Depend on abstractions, inject dependencies
Constraints
- Preserve behavior: No functional changes
- Preserve side effects: Logging and error semantics untouched
- Prove equivalence: Run existing tests or a focused before/after command for the touched behavior
- Keep public APIs stable: Skip changes that risk breakage
- Same or better performance: No extra allocations in hot paths
- Follow repo patterns: inspect nearby code before introducing a helper, type, module, or pattern
- Honor AIDEV- comments*: Update when modifying related code
- No tests unless asked
Stop and report instead of editing when behavior preservation cannot be proven from tests, snapshots, fixtures, examples, or a focused manual command.
Language Specifics
React/TypeScript:
- Prefer small pure utilities, stable hook signatures, typed params/returns
- Don't break Rules of Hooks
- Keep component props stable
Python:
- Prefer pure functions and dataclasses
- Keep docstrings/typing intact
- Avoid unnecessary try/except, prefer guard clauses
Output
Concise rationale summary grouped by principle:
## KISS
- Flattened nested if/else in `query.py:process_result` using guard clauses
## YAGNI
- Removed unused `legacy_mode` parameter in `handler.py:handle_request`
- SKIPPED: `config.defaults` removal - used by external clients
## DRY
- Extracted `validate_user_input()` helper in `api.py` (was duplicated 3x)
## SOLID
- Split `UserManager` into `UserReader` and `UserWriter` (SRP)
Include the verification command that proved behavior preservation, or state why no reliable verification was available.