root-cause-investigator

star 393

Systematic root cause analysis for errors, bugs, and unexpected behaviors using 5-Why methodology. Use when user reports errors, build failures, test failures, performance issues, integration problems, or any "it's not working" scenarios.

umputun By umputun schedule Updated 2/17/2026

name: root-cause-investigator description: Systematic root cause analysis for errors, bugs, and unexpected behaviors using 5-Why methodology. Use when user reports errors, build failures, test failures, performance issues, integration problems, or any "it's not working" scenarios.

Root Cause Investigator

Apply systematic 5-Why methodology to identify fundamental root causes of issues rather than treating symptoms. Guide thorough investigation through structured evidence gathering and analysis.

Activation Triggers

  • errors, bugs, or unexpected behavior
  • build failures or test failures
  • performance issues or degradation
  • integration problems
  • any "it's not working" scenarios

The 5-Why Methodology

Systematically ask "why" five times to drill down to root cause:

  1. Why #1: identify immediate cause (symptoms)
  2. Why #2: uncover process/workflow issues
  3. Why #3: find system-level problems
  4. Why #4: discover design/architecture issues
  5. Why #5: reveal fundamental root cause

Investigation Workflow

1. Gather Initial Context

Collect information about the issue:

## Issue Summary
[brief description of reported problem]

## Initial Symptoms
- what user is experiencing
- error messages or logs
- observable behavior

## Context Gathering
- environment details
- recent changes
- related components
- steps to reproduce

2. Apply 5-Why Analysis

Structure the investigation with progressive depth:

## 5-Why Analysis

### Why #1: [surface cause]
Evidence: [logs, errors, behavior]
Impact: [what this affects]

### Why #2: [deeper cause]
Evidence: [code, configuration]
Impact: [cascading effects]

### Why #3: [system cause]
Evidence: [architecture, dependencies]
Impact: [broader implications]

### Why #4: [process/design cause]
Evidence: [patterns, decisions]
Impact: [long-term effects]

### Why #5: [root cause]
Evidence: [fundamental issue]
Impact: [core problem]

3. Identify Root Cause

Document the fundamental issue requiring attention:

## Root Cause Identified
[the fundamental issue that needs addressing]

## Recommended Investigation Areas
- specific files to examine
- components to test
- systems to verify

Investigation Principles

  1. Avoid solution bias - focus on understanding before fixing
  2. Gather evidence - don't assume, verify with data
  3. Consider multiple causes - issues often have multiple contributing factors
  4. Document findings - clear documentation prevents repeat issues
  5. Think systemically - consider broader implications
  6. Question assumptions - challenge "it should work" thinking
  7. Use version control - check when issue was introduced

Using Reference Materials

Load reference files as needed during investigation:

  • references/patterns.md - common root cause patterns by category (configuration, race conditions, resource exhaustion, integration failures, build/deployment issues)
  • references/techniques.md - investigation techniques with command examples (error analysis, code investigation, dependency analysis, environment investigation)

Best Practices

  • resist proposing solutions until root cause is identified
  • be thorough and methodical
  • document evidence at each level of analysis
  • verify assumptions with concrete data
  • consider the issue from multiple perspectives (technical, environmental, architectural, external dependencies, process)

The goal is to find the fundamental cause, not just fix symptoms.

Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/umputun/cc-thingz --skill root-cause-investigator
Repository Details
star Stars 393
call_split Forks 36
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator