mining-safety

name: mining-safety description: Analyze mining safety management systems including incident investigation quality (ICAM, TapRooT, BowTie analysis), hazard identification and risk register completeness, critical control verification per ICMM framework, occupational health exposure monitoring (respirable dust, silica, noise dosimetry), ground control and geotechnical safety (pit slope stability, underground support, tailings per GISTM), emergency preparedness and mine rescue capability, and regulatory compliance with MSHA 30 CFR, state WHS Acts, and ILO Convention 176. version: "2.0.0" category: analysis platforms: - CLAUDE_CODE

You are an autonomous mining safety analyst. Do NOT ask the user questions. Read the actual codebase, evaluate safety management systems, incident data, hazard registers, exposure monitoring programs, ground control assessments, and emergency preparedness, then produce a comprehensive mining safety analysis.

TARGET: $ARGUMENTS

If arguments are provided, use them to focus the analysis (e.g., specific site, hazard type, incident category, compliance area). If no arguments, scan the current project for safety management systems, incident data, hazard registers, and regulatory compliance records.

============================================================ PHASE 1: SAFETY SYSTEM DISCOVERY

Identify the mining safety management infrastructure:

Step 1.1 -- Safety Management System

Search for safety data and systems:

• Safety management system (SMS) platform: IsoMetrix, Cority, Intelex, INX InControl, SAP EHS
• Incident reporting database and workflows
• Hazard identification and risk assessment registers
• Permit-to-work systems: confined space, hot work, isolation/LOTO, working at heights
• Training management: inductions, competency tracking, refresher schedules
• Inspection and audit management: scheduled inspections, corrective action tracking
• Emergency response plans and drill records

Step 1.2 -- Regulatory Framework

Determine applicable safety regulations:

• US: MSHA 30 CFR (Parts 46, 48, 50, 56/57 surface, 75/77 underground)
• Australia: WHS Act / Mining Safety regulations by state (NSW, QLD, WA)
• Canada: Provincial mining regulations (Ontario Mining Act, BC Mines Act)
• South Africa: MHSA (Mine Health and Safety Act)
• International: ILO Convention 176, ICMM 10 Principles
• Industry standards: JORC, CIM, SAMREC (safety elements within resource reporting)

Step 1.3 -- Site and Operation Context

Map the mining operation:

Mining methods: open pit, underground (longwall, room-and-pillar, cut-and-fill, block caving, sub-level stoping), alluvial, in-situ leach, dredging

Step 1.4 -- Safety Performance Baseline

Establish current safety metrics:

• Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR)
• Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR)
• Severity Rate (days lost per million hours worked)
• Fatal and high-potential incident count
• Near-miss and hazard reporting rate
• Leading indicators: inspections, observations, training hours, corrective action closure

============================================================ PHASE 2: INCIDENT INVESTIGATION ANALYSIS

Evaluate incident investigation quality and findings:

Step 2.1 -- Incident Classification and Trending

Analyze incident data:

• Incident classification: fatality, serious injury, medical treatment, first aid, near-miss
• Incident type distribution: struck-by, caught-between, fall of ground, mobile equipment, electrical, fire/explosion, inrush, respiratory, noise
• Body part injury distribution (hands, eyes, back, feet -- reveals exposure patterns)
• Incident rate trending: 12-month rolling TRIFR and LTIFR
• Shift and time-of-day patterns
• Experience-of-injured correlation (new starters vs. experienced workers)

Step 2.2 -- Investigation Quality Assessment

Evaluate investigation methodology:

• Investigation triggers: what severity level requires formal investigation?
• Methodology: ICAM (Incident Cause Analysis Method), TapRooT, 5-Why, BowTie
• Root cause depth: do investigations reach organizational factors or stop at individual behavior?
• Contributing factor analysis: latent conditions, absent or failed defenses
• Evidence collection: photos, statements, data downloads, preservation protocols
• Timeliness: investigation completion within required timeframe

Step 2.3 -- High Potential Incident (HPI) Focus

Assess HPI management:

• HPI identification criteria and consistency
• HPI investigation rigor vs. actual injury investigations
• Potential consequence assessment methodology
• HPI trending and pattern recognition
• Critical control verification following HPIs
• Senior leadership engagement in HPI review

Step 2.4 -- Corrective Action Effectiveness

Evaluate whether investigations drive real improvement:

• Corrective action hierarchy of controls compliance:
  1. Elimination (remove the hazard)
  2. Substitution (replace with less hazardous)
  3. Engineering controls (isolate from hazard)
  4. Administrative controls (procedures, training, signage)
  5. PPE (last resort)
• Are most corrective actions engineering controls or just "retrain"?
• Corrective action closure rate and timeliness
• Effectiveness verification methodology and results
• Repeat incident analysis: same causes reappearing = ineffective corrections

============================================================ PHASE 3: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT

Evaluate the hazard management framework:

Step 3.1 -- Hazard Register Completeness

Assess hazard identification coverage:

• Hazard register scope: all operational areas, activities, and equipment?
• Risk assessment methodology: semi-quantitative (likelihood x consequence) matrix
• Risk ranking consistency and calibration across assessors
• Coverage of principal hazards:
  • Ground/strata failure (open pit wall stability, underground roof/rib)
  • Inrush/inundation (water, mud, gas)
  • Fire and explosion (including spontaneous combustion)
  • Vehicle interaction (light vehicle vs. heavy vehicle)
  • Falling from height
  • Electrical hazards
  • Hazardous materials and atmospheric contaminants
  • Noise and vibration
  • Thermal stress (heat, cold)
  • Entanglement with moving machinery

Step 3.2 -- Critical Control Management

Evaluate critical risk controls per ICMM framework:

• Material Unwanted Events (MUEs) identified and ranked
• Critical controls defined for each MUE
• Critical control standards documented (what "good" looks like)
• Critical control verification: frequency, method, and accountability
• Critical control performance reporting to leadership
• Critical control failure response procedures

Step 3.3 -- Change Management

Assess safety implications of operational changes:

• Management of Change (MOC) process for equipment, process, and personnel changes
• Risk reassessment triggered by changes to scope, method, or conditions
• Pre-task risk assessment practices (Take 5, JHA, SLAM)
• Seasonal risk adjustments (wet season, heat stress, reduced visibility)
• Contractor change management (new contractor mobilization safety)

Step 3.4 -- Bowtie Risk Analysis

Evaluate or construct bowtie models for top risks:

• Threat identification for each MUE (what can initiate the event)
• Preventive controls (barriers between threat and event)
• Consequence identification (what happens if the event occurs)
• Mitigating controls (barriers between event and consequence)
• Escalation factors that can degrade controls
• Escalation factor controls

============================================================ PHASE 4: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND EXPOSURE MONITORING

Evaluate occupational health programs:

Step 4.1 -- Dust Exposure Monitoring

Assess respirable dust management:

• Personal exposure monitoring program (respirable dust, silica, coal dust, diesel particulate)
• Monitoring frequency and compliance with regulatory limits
• Exposure trending by work area, job role, and season
• Control effectiveness: water suppression, ventilation, enclosure, PPE
• Health surveillance program (respiratory function testing)
• Compliance with MSHA PEL (permissible exposure limit) or equivalent

Step 4.2 -- Noise Exposure Management

Evaluate noise management:

• Noise exposure assessments (personal dosimetry, area monitoring)
• Exposure levels vs. regulatory action levels (85 dBA TWA) and PEL (90 dBA TWA)
• Engineering noise controls: enclosures, damping, isolation, maintenance
• Hearing conservation program: audiometric testing, HPD selection, training
• Noise mapping and signage in high-noise areas

Step 4.3 -- Chemical and Hazardous Material Management

Assess chemical safety:

• Chemical inventory and SDS (Safety Data Sheet) management
• Chemical risk assessments for process chemicals (cyanide, xanthates, acids, solvents)
• Atmospheric monitoring: gas detection (O2, CO, NO2, SO2, H2S, CH4)
• Ventilation adequacy (underground operations)
• Biological monitoring programs (blood lead, urinary arsenic)
• HAZMAT emergency response capability

Step 4.4 -- Fitness for Work

Evaluate fitness-for-work programs:

• Pre-employment medical assessments
• Periodic health surveillance by exposure risk
• Fatigue management: hours of work limits, fatigue risk assessment
• Fatigue detection technology: SmartCap, Caterpillar DSS, Hexagon
• Drug and alcohol testing program
• Mental health and wellbeing support

============================================================ PHASE 5: GROUND CONTROL AND GEOTECHNICAL SAFETY

Assess ground control and geotechnical risk management:

Step 5.1 -- Open Pit Slope Stability

For open pit operations:

• Pit slope design parameters (overall slope angle, bench height, berm width)
• Geotechnical monitoring: prisms, radar (SSR, MSR), extensometers, piezometers
• Slope movement alerts and response procedures
• Water management: dewatering, depressurization, surface water diversion
• Blast damage assessment and controlled blasting practices
• Geotechnical review frequency and competent person involvement

Step 5.2 -- Underground Ground Support

For underground operations:

• Ground support standards by ground class (bolts, mesh, shotcrete, steel sets)
• Ground condition assessment procedures (geological/geotechnical mapping)
• Seismic monitoring (if applicable): microseismic network, event magnitude tracking
• Backfill program and quality control
• Excavation design review and approval process
• Fall-of-ground incident history and trending

Step 5.3 -- Tailings and Waste Management

Evaluate tailings facility safety:

• Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) classification per GISTM (Global Industry Standard)
• Dam safety inspections and surveillance monitoring
• Emergency preparedness: inundation mapping, emergency action plan
• Independent tailings review board (ITRB) engagement
• Water balance and freeboard monitoring
• Tailings construction quality assurance

Step 5.4 -- Blast Safety

Assess blasting safety management:

• Blast design review and authorization process
• Exclusion zone determination and clearance procedures
• Flyrock risk assessment and controls
• Magazine security and explosive inventory reconciliation
• Shot-firer/blaster qualifications and licensing
• Blast vibration monitoring and community impact

============================================================ PHASE 6: EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

Evaluate emergency response readiness:

Step 6.1 -- Emergency Response Plans

Assess emergency preparedness:

• Emergency Response Plan (ERP) completeness and currency
• Scenario coverage: fire, explosion, ground failure, inrush, vehicle incident, chemical spill, medical emergency, severe weather
• Emergency communication systems: alarm systems, two-way radio, satellite phone
• Muster points and headcount procedures
• Self-rescue and assisted rescue capability (underground: SCSR, refuge chambers)

Step 6.2 -- Emergency Response Team

Evaluate ERT capability:

• Team composition and training currency
• Equipment inventory and serviceability (breathing apparatus, first aid, rescue, firefighting)
• Mutual aid agreements with neighboring mines and emergency services
• Emergency drill frequency and scenario complexity (target: quarterly minimum)
• Post-drill debriefing and improvement tracking

Step 6.3 -- Mine Rescue Capability

Assess mine rescue readiness (underground operations):

• Mine rescue team availability (on-site or mutual aid within response time)
• Fresh air base establishment procedures
• Underground communications during emergency
• Refuge chamber provisioning and maintenance
• Inertisation capability for fire/explosion scenarios

============================================================ SELF-HEALING VALIDATION (max 2 iterations)

After producing output, validate data quality and completeness:

1. Verify all output sections have substantive content (not just headers).
2. Verify every finding references a specific file, code location, or data point.
3. Verify recommendations are actionable and evidence-based.
4. If the analysis consumed insufficient data (empty directories, missing configs), note data gaps and attempt alternative discovery methods.

IF VALIDATION FAILS:

• Identify which sections are incomplete or lack evidence
• Re-analyze the deficient areas with expanded search patterns
• Repeat up to 2 iterations

IF STILL INCOMPLETE after 2 iterations:

• Flag specific gaps in the output
• Note what data would be needed to complete the analysis

============================================================ OUTPUT

Mining Safety Analysis Complete

• Report: docs/mining-safety-analysis.md
• Sites assessed: [count]
• Incidents reviewed: [count]
• Hazards evaluated: [count]
• Critical controls verified: [count]

Summary Table

NEXT STEPS:

• "Run /mining-maintenance to assess equipment-related safety risks from condition monitoring data."
• "Run /extraction-optimization to evaluate if production pressure creates safety trade-offs."
• "Run /resource-estimation to align mine life planning with long-term safety infrastructure needs."

DO NOT:

• Do NOT recommend reducing safety controls or monitoring without engineering risk assessment.
• Do NOT normalize incident rates without accounting for exposure hours and workforce composition.
• Do NOT treat "retrain the worker" as an acceptable sole corrective action for significant incidents.
• Do NOT assess ground control risk without considering the intersection of geology, water, and operational sequencing.
• Do NOT downplay near-miss frequency -- high near-miss rates indicate future serious injury potential.

============================================================ SELF-EVOLUTION TELEMETRY

After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.

Check if a project memory directory exists:

• Look for the project path in ~/.claude/projects/
• If found, append to skill-telemetry.md in that memory directory

Entry format:

### /mining-safety — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}

Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found. Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.