creative-process

name: creative-process description: >- Creative process for visual artists: working in series, developing a concept from seed to finished work, overcoming creative blocks, sketchbook practice, sustaining a practice over time, moving between projects, knowing when a piece is done, cultivating sources of inspiration. Triggers: creative block, creative process, working in series, inspiration, sketchbook, concept development, artistic practice, how to start, stuck, artist practice.

A creative practice is a set of habits and conditions that make work possible — not a state of inspiration you're waiting for. This covers how to develop ideas, sustain momentum, work through blocks, and build a body of work rather than isolated pieces.

Working in series

Making a series — a group of related works that investigate the same subject, question, or formal problem — is one of the most useful structures for artistic development.

Why series work:

Each piece informs the next; your thinking deepens as you go
A body of related work is more powerful in exhibition than isolated pieces
You don't start from scratch each time — you have a direction
It gives you a framework for saying no to tangents

Starting a series

A series begins with a question or a limitation, not an answer.

Good series starters:

"What happens if I apply my visual language to [specific subject]?"
"I want to explore [cultural concept] across multiple images"
"What does [animal/place/theme] look like through my particular lens?"
"I'm going to make 10 pieces that all share [formal constraint]"

The limitation is productive. "Paint anything you want" is harder than "make 6 pieces about water."

When a series is done

A series is done when:

You've answered the question you were asking, or discovered you were asking the wrong question
You've made the most interesting piece you can within this set of constraints
You're repeating yourself rather than developing

It's not done just because you hit a number you set at the beginning. Be willing to extend or close early.

Concept development: seed to finished work

Stage 1 — The seed

An idea that interests you enough to start. It doesn't need to be fully formed. Write it down. Sketch it. Describe it in a sentence. Most ideas that never get made die here because nothing was recorded.

Keep a place for seeds — a notebook, a phone note, a folder of reference images. Don't filter too hard at this stage. Collect.

Stage 2 — Research and gathering

Before you make anything, spend time with the subject. For work rooted in Indigenous tradition: read, look at primary sources, talk to community members, look at historical and contemporary work in the same territory.

Gather:

Reference images (for visual research, not copying)
Notes on what you're finding interesting
Sketches — loose, exploratory, non-precious

Stage 3 — First attempts

Make something. It will probably be wrong. That's the point — first attempts are diagnostic. They show you what you don't yet know about the subject and what the problems are.

Make more than one. Make variations. Don't commit to the first iteration.

Stage 4 — Development

The middle of a piece or series is where most people lose the thread. A few techniques:

Step away and return — distance collapses what you can no longer see because you've been looking too long
Change the constraint — try the same subject at a different scale, with a different palette, with less or more complexity
Show someone — not for approval, but for the experience of explaining what you're trying to do; you'll often figure out what's not working in the act of describing it

Stage 5 — Knowing when it's done

A piece is done when further changes would be changes to the piece, not improvements to it. This is different from "I could add more."

Signs a piece is done:

Every element is there for a reason
Removing anything would lose something important
You've solved the problem you set out to solve
You've been going back and forth and it keeps landing in the same place

Signs it isn't done:

You're avoiding looking at it
Something is nagging you but you can't name it yet
You added something to fix an earlier mistake rather than removing the mistake

Overcoming creative blocks

A block is usually one of a few things in disguise:

Fear of the first mark — the blank canvas problem. Fix: make a bad first mark on purpose. Scribble, sketch wrong, do something you know you'll paint over. The block is about the perfection of the unused surface; destroy it deliberately.

Unclear direction — you don't know what you're trying to make. Fix: don't start a finished piece; start a research sketch or a technical study. Make something where success isn't the point.

Exhaustion or depletion — you've been putting out without taking in. Fix: consume. Look at other work, go somewhere, photograph something, read. Input before output.

Pressure — real or imagined deadline, the feeling that what you make will be judged. Fix: make something private. Make something in a medium that isn't your "real" medium. Make something you'll throw away.

The transition problem — you just finished something big and don't know what comes next. This is normal. Give yourself a fallow period. Make small things. Don't force the next big project before you know what it is.

Sketchbook practice

A sketchbook is a place for thinking without judgment. It works best when it's genuinely private — not for showing, not for social media.

What to put in it:

Visual ideas before you know if they're good
Studies from reference (learning to see something)
Problems you're trying to solve (how does this compositional idea work at different scales?)
Notes connected to visual ideas
Failed attempts worth remembering

What not to worry about:

Whether the drawings are good
Whether anyone sees it
Whether it represents you well

The function of a sketchbook is to externalize your thinking so you can look at it. It's a tool, not a portfolio.

Sustaining practice over time

Making work regularly — not just when inspired — is a skill that requires structure.

What helps:

Protected time — a block in the week that belongs to the work. Not "when I have time." Time has to be made.
A consistent workspace — even a corner of a room that's designated. Walking in triggers the mode.
Small commitments — "I'll spend 30 minutes" is easier to keep than "I'll work until it's done." 30 minutes of work most days beats one marathon session per month.
Lower the bar for a session — "Today I'll look at reference and sketch" is a session. It doesn't always have to be productive output.

What doesn't help:

Waiting to feel inspired before starting
Setting goals that require a perfect day to meet
Comparing your output rate to other artists without knowing their circumstances

Cultivating sources

Your work draws from what you take in. Narrow sources produce narrow work.

Sources worth cultivating:

The traditions and communities your work comes from — primary engagement, not just secondhand
Work from artists outside your medium and genre
Natural history, science, and ecology (especially for work involving animals and landscape)
Music — particularly traditions that share concerns with your visual work
Literature and oral tradition
Your own photographs, field notes, observations

The goal is depth in a few things rather than a shallow pass over everything. A body of work rooted in genuine research and engagement reads differently than one assembled from surface references.

Curating a reference library

A reference library is only useful if it's actionable. The goal is not a large archive — it's a small, prioritized set of images you're actually going to use.

Score on transformation potential, not surface resemblance

The key question when evaluating a reference image is not "does this already look like my work?" It's "what could I make from this through my own lens?"

An image that seems distant from your usual subject matter may carry everything you need: a silhouette, a gesture, a quality of light, a compositional tension. An image that superficially resembles your work may give you nothing new. Evaluate what you would bring to it, not what's already there.

A working rubric (0–5)

5 — Must make this piece. Strong transformation potential, clear connection to active series or themes, compelling visual problem.
4 — Strong reference. Worth keeping and returning to. Feeds a real direction even if the timing isn't now.
3 — Worth exploring. Something interesting here but the angle isn't fully clear yet.
2 — Weak hook. Possible but low energy. Keep only if your library is small.
1 — Probably not. Hard to see a path. Let it go.
0 — Skip entirely.

When in doubt, weight toward transformation potential. A 5 is not a perfect image — it's an image that creates productive tension with your visual language.

Organize by score, not subject

Subject-based folders ("wildlife," "portraits," "landscapes") make filing easy but finding hard. When you sit down to work, you don't want to know where you put something — you want to know what your best material is.

Score-based folders (top tier, strong, exploratory) keep your best references at the top. You open the folder and immediately see what's worth working from.

Build a priority pipeline

Within your top-tier references, mark a small number as active:

Paint now — the 3–5 images you intend to work from in the current period
Paint next — the next group after that
Everything else is held — good enough to keep, not yet scheduled

This keeps the library from becoming a graveyard of intentions. If something sits in "paint next" through two or three review cycles without moving up, it may not be as strong as you thought.

Two-pass evaluation

For a large collection, a two-pass approach is efficient:

Quick pass — sort by obvious criteria. Anything clearly irrelevant goes immediately. Don't spend time justifying cuts.
View pass — look carefully at anything ambiguous. Filenames and thumbnails mislead. An image you'd dismiss at a glance may open up when you sit with it.

Review periodically

Your series and priorities change. An image that scored a 3 when your focus was elsewhere may become a 5 when you start a new body of work. A small annual or semi-annual review — re-scoring and re-prioritizing — keeps the library current rather than frozen at the moment you assembled it.

Artist statement writing: artist-statement-writing
Blues songwriting process: blues-songwriting
Brainstorm and ideation tools: brainstorming-ideation
Tom's visual language and series: tom-myer-art-language

creative-process