By name: slide-excellence description: Run combined multi-dimensional slide review: visual audit, pedagogy review, and proofreading (and optionally TikZ parity). Use when the user asks for full or comprehensive slide review before a milestone.
Slide Excellence Review
Run a combined review: visual + pedagogy + proofreading (and TikZ/parity if relevant). Produce one synthesized report.
Steps
Identify the file from the user's message (in
Quarto/orSlides/).Run these reviews (you are one agent doing all roles in sequence):
- Visual audit: overflow, fonts, box fatigue, spacing →
quality_reports/[FILE]_visual_audit.md - Pedagogy: 13 patterns, narrative, pacing, notation →
quality_reports/[FILE]_pedagogy_report.md - Proofread: grammar, typos, consistency →
quality_reports/[FILE]_report.md - TikZ (if file has TikZ): labels, geometry, semantics →
quality_reports/[FILE]_tikz_review.md - Content parity (if .qmd with .tex): frame count, content drift →
quality_reports/[FILE]_parity_report.md
- Visual audit: overflow, fonts, box fatigue, spacing →
Synthesize a single summary:
# Slide Excellence: [Filename]
## Overall: EXCELLENT / GOOD / NEEDS WORK / POOR
| Dimension | Critical | Medium | Low |
| Visual | ... | ... | ... |
| Pedagogical | ... | ... | ... |
| Proofreading | ... | ... | ... |
### Critical (fix first)
### Medium (next revision)
### Next steps
- Rubric: Excellent 0–2 critical / 0–5 medium; Good 3–5 / 6–15; Needs Work 6–10 / 16–30; Poor 11+ / 31+.