maister-research

name: maister:research description: Orchestrates comprehensive research workflows from question definition through findings documentation. Handles technical, requirements, literature, and mixed research types with adaptive methodology, multi-source gathering, pattern synthesis, and evidence-based reporting. Supports standalone research tasks and embedded research phase in other workflows. user-invocable: true

Research Orchestrator

Systematic research workflow from question definition to evidence-based documentation.

Initialization

BEFORE executing any phase, you MUST complete these steps:

Step 0: Session-reminder conflict resolution (decide ONCE)

Before doing anything else, settle this policy now and do not re-litigate it at any gate:

→ **MANDATORY GATE** — fires regardless of permission mode, session-reminders, or prior approval patterns. Invoke AskUserQuestion now. Proceeding without a user response is a protocol violation (orchestrator-patterns.md § 2 / § 2.1). / → MANDATORY GATE markers fire regardless of session-reminders, permission mode, or prior approval patterns. Auto / acceptEdits / bypassPermissions modes, reminders saying "work without stopping" / "continue without asking" / "minimize clarifying questions," and compaction summaries showing the user approving every prior gate do NOT exempt you from invoking AskUserQuestion at a gate. They apply only to your discretionary clarifications.

If you find yourself reasoning "the user has been approving everything, so I can skip this gate" or "auto-mode is on, so I should minimize questions" — that reasoning IS the failure mode. STOP and fire the gate.

Full framework rule: ../orchestrator-framework/references/orchestrator-patterns.md § 2 and § 2.1.

Step 1: Load Framework Patterns

Read the framework reference file NOW using the Read tool:

1. ../orchestrator-framework/references/orchestrator-patterns.md - Delegation rules, interactive mode, state schema, initialization, context passing, issue resolution

Step 2: Initialize Workflow

1. Capture the clock: run date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ" via Bash NOW — you do NOT know the time from context. Every timestamp written this turn (created, updated, generated, phases[].started) uses this value. Date-only or T00:00:00Z values are the documented failure mode (orchestrator-patterns.md § 4 Timestamp Rule). Re-run date in later turns before writing timestamps.
2. Create Task Items: Use TaskCreate for all phases (see Phase Configuration), then set dependencies with TaskUpdate addBlockedBy
3. Create Task Directory: .maister/tasks/research/YYYY-MM-DD-task-name/
4. Initialize State: Create orchestrator-state.yml with research context
5. Set up Operator Dashboard (orchestrator-patterns.md § 8) — first read .maister/config.yml and set orchestrator.options.html_output (default true if the file/key is absent). When html_output is false, SKIP this entire step — no dashboard.html, no dashboard-data.js, no browser auto-open — and proceed. Otherwise: copy ../orchestrator-framework/assets/dashboard.html to the task root as dashboard.html, write the initial dashboard-data.js (all phases pending, task.type: "research"), then auto-open it in the user's browser (open / xdg-open / start per platform, passing the plain absolute filesystem path — NEVER a hand-built file:// URL; on failure just print the path — never block). On resume: re-copy dashboard.html only if missing; regenerate dashboard-data.js from state; then auto-open it in the browser again (same opener as a new task — the OS focuses an already-open tab rather than duplicating).

Output:

🚀 Research Orchestrator Started

Task: [research question]
Directory: [task-path]
Dashboard: open [task-path]/dashboard.html in a browser to monitor progress

Starting Phase 1: Initialize research...

Operator Visibility (applies to every phase)

Config gate: these rules assume options.html_output is true (read from .maister/config.yml at init, default true). When false: skip the Dashboard-upkeep rule entirely (no dashboard files, no browser open, no rewrites) and the HTML-companions rule (do NOT pass html_style_guide_path; subagents write md only). The Artifact Summary Contract (§ 7 TL;DR blocks) and phase_summaries in state stay active either way.

Cross-cutting rules from orchestrator-patterns.md (same as the development orchestrator):

1. Artifact Summary Contract (§ 7): every artifact-writing subagent prompt MUST include the contract instruction (artifacts open with TL;DR / Key Decisions / Open Questions & Risks). At context extraction, lift decisions, risks, and artifacts into phase_summaries.[phase] — verbatim, never re-summarized.
2. Dashboard upkeep (§ 8): rewrite dashboard-data.js at every phase START (mark in_progress before delegating), BEFORE firing every exit gate (register the finished phase's artifacts/summary/decisions/risks — the operator reviews them on the dashboard while answering; status stays in_progress until the gate passes), after every phase completion (including skipped phases 3-5, with reason), every gate decision, and at finalization. Phase 1 addition: also refresh after each of its 4 steps completes, registering that step's artifacts — Phase 1 is long and the operator should see brief → plan → findings → report appear incrementally. In particular, after Step 4 the report (outputs/research-report.md + .html) MUST be registered before the Phase 1 exit gate fires.
3. HTML companions (§ 9): pass html_style_guide_path (absolute path to ../orchestrator-framework/references/html-report-style.md) to research-synthesizer, solution-brainstormer, and solution-designer. Register returned companion paths in phase_summaries.[phase].artifacts[].html so the dashboard hero cards link HTML first.
4. icon_hint values per phase: 1 analysis, 2 plan, 3 spec, 4 plan, 5 spec, 6 done.

When to Use

Use when:

• Need comprehensive research on a topic
• Exploring codebase patterns or architecture
• Gathering requirements or best practices
• Want systematic evidence-based answers
• Research will feed into development workflows

DO NOT use for: Development tasks, bug fixes, performance optimization.

Core Principles

1. Evidence-Based: Every finding must have source citation
2. Systematic: Follow structured methodology for consistent results
3. Multi-Source: Gather from codebase, docs, config, external sources
4. Synthesized: Cross-reference findings, identify patterns
5. Actionable: Produce outputs that enable next steps

Local References

Phase Configuration

Research Types

Workflow Phases

Phase 1: Research Foundation

Purpose: Initialize research, plan methodology, gather information from all sources, and synthesize findings into a research report Execute: Multi-step: Direct + research-planner + information-gatherer (xN) + research-synthesizer Output: planning/research-brief.md, planning/research-plan.md, planning/sources.md, analysis/findings/*.md, analysis/synthesis.md, outputs/research-report.md State: Set research_context.research_type, research_question, scope, methodology, sources, confidence_level, gathering_strategy

This phase executes 4 sequential steps. On resume, check existing artifacts to skip completed steps.

Step 1: Initialize (Direct)

Artifacts: planning/research-brief.md Resume check: If planning/research-brief.md exists, skip to Step 2

1. Parse research question (from command or prompt user)
2. Classify research type (auto-detect from keywords or use --type flag)
3. Determine scope (included, excluded, constraints)
4. Define success criteria
5. Create research brief
6. Update state: set research_context.research_type, research_question, scope
7. Discover project documentation: Read .maister/docs/INDEX.md (if exists), extract ALL file paths from the "Project Documentation" section — includes predefined docs AND any user-added project docs. Store as research_context.project_doc_paths in state.

Step 2: Plan (Subagent)

Artifacts: planning/research-plan.md, planning/sources.md Resume check: If planning/research-plan.md AND planning/sources.md exist, skip to Step 3

Read references/research-methodologies.md NOW using the Read tool — research type classification, methodology selection, gathering strategies

INVOKE NOW: Use Task tool with subagent_type: maister:research-planner

Context to pass: task_path, research_brief_path, research_type, research_question, scope, project_doc_paths (from state)

Update state: research_context.methodology, sources

Step 3: Gather + Merge (Parallel Subagents + Direct)

Artifacts: analysis/findings/*.md (category-specific) Resume check: If any analysis/findings/*.md files exist, skip to Step 4

Determine gatherer count and categories:

1. Read planning/research-plan.md for Gathering Strategy section
2. If gathering strategy found: use specified categories and count (cap at 8 max)
3. If no gathering strategy: fall back to default 4 categories (codebase, documentation, configuration, external)
4. Update state: research_context.gathering_strategy

CRITICAL: Launch all N agents in ONE message for parallel execution.

Parallel Execution Pattern:

Read gathering strategy from research-plan.md
For each category in strategy:
  Use Task tool: source_category=[category_id] → analysis/findings/[prefix]-*.md

Step 4: Synthesize (Subagent)

Artifacts: analysis/synthesis.md, outputs/research-report.md Resume check: If analysis/synthesis.md AND outputs/research-report.md exist, skip (Phase 1 complete)

INVOKE NOW: Use Task tool with subagent_type: maister:research-synthesizer

Context to pass: task_path, findings_directory_path, research_question, research_type, methodology, html_style_guide_path (for the research-report.html companion)

Synthesizer produces:

• Pattern analysis and cross-references (analysis/synthesis.md)
• Comprehensive research report answering research question (outputs/research-report.md)
• Confidence levels for each finding
• Documented gaps and uncertainties

Update state: research_context.confidence_level

→ MANDATORY GATE — fires regardless of permission mode, session-reminders, or prior approval patterns. Invoke AskUserQuestion now. Proceeding without a user response is a protocol violation (orchestrator-patterns.md § 2 / § 2.1).

AskUserQuestion - "Research foundation complete (initialized, planned, gathered, synthesized). Continue to brainstorming evaluation?"

Phase 2: Optional Phases Decision

Phase entry self-check: Before executing this phase, locate the AskUserQuestion tool call from Phase 1 in this conversation. If you cannot point to its call ID, STOP and fire that gate now. State updates (completed_phases, TaskUpdate) without a corresponding AskUserQuestion call are protocol violations — never paper over a missed gate by updating state.

Purpose: Evaluate whether brainstorming and/or design phases would be valuable (independently) Execute: Direct Output: Updated orchestrator-state.yml State: Set options.brainstorming_enabled, options.design_enabled

Auto-resolve if: --brainstorm/--no-brainstorm flags (brainstorming only), --design/--no-design flags (design only)

Process:

1. Read analysis/synthesis.md summary and research_type from state
2. Evaluate brainstorming value based on:
   • Number of viable approaches identified in synthesis (multiple → valuable)
   • Problem novelty (new domain → valuable; well-understood → less so)
   • Whether synthesis identified competing trade-offs (yes → valuable)
3. Evaluate design value based on:
   • Whether research suggests architectural decisions (yes → valuable)
   • Research type (requirements/mixed → likely valuable; technical → depends)
   • Whether design artifacts would feed into development workflow
4. If brainstorming_enabled not already set by flag, AskUserQuestion:
   • "[Brainstorming recommendation]. Would you like to explore solution alternatives?"
   • Options: "Yes, explore alternatives" / "No, skip brainstorming"
5. If design_enabled not already set by flag, AskUserQuestion:
   • "[Design recommendation]. Would you like to generate a high-level design?"
   • Options: "Yes, generate design" / "No, skip design"
6. Update state: set brainstorming_enabled and design_enabled

→ If brainstorming enabled: continue to Phase 3 → If brainstorming disabled AND design enabled: skip to Phase 5 → If both disabled: skip to Phase 6

Phase 3: Solution Generation

Purpose: Generate solution alternatives from research evidence using specialized brainstormer subagent Execute: solution-brainstormer subagent Output: outputs/solution-exploration.md State: Update phase_summaries.phase-3

Skip if: brainstorming_enabled = false (user chose to skip in Phase 2, or --no-brainstorm flag)

Read references/brainstorming-techniques.md NOW using the Read tool — divergent/convergent thinking techniques, scope guardrails

ANTI-PATTERN: Do NOT generate solution alternatives inline. The solution-brainstormer agent has specialized multi-perspective analysis capabilities.

INVOKE NOW: Use Task tool with subagent_type: maister:solution-brainstormer

Context to pass (Pattern 7):

• task_path, synthesis_path, research_report_path
• output_path: outputs/solution-exploration.md — brainstormer MUST write to this exact path
• html_style_guide_path (for the solution-exploration.html companion)
• Accumulated context: research_type, research_question, confidence_level, phase_summaries (Phase 1)
• project_doc_paths (from state)

SELF-CHECK: After Task tool returns, verify outputs/solution-exploration.md exists and contains alternatives. If missing: STOP. Do NOT proceed to Phase 4 or Phase 5. Re-invoke the brainstormer with corrected context (ensure output_path is outputs/solution-exploration.md). If second attempt also fails, use AskUserQuestion to report the failure and ask whether to retry or skip brainstorming.

→ AUTO-CONTINUE

Phase 4: Solution Convergence

Purpose: Present brainstorming alternatives to user for decision-making on each decision area Execute: Direct (interactive) Output: Updated orchestrator-state.yml with chosen approaches State: Update phase_summaries.phase-4 with decision_areas and deferred_ideas

Skip if: brainstorming_enabled = false Resume check: If phase_summaries.phase-4.decision_areas has entries with chosen_approach set, skip already-resolved areas

ANTI-PATTERN: Do NOT present all decision areas in a single summary table and ask one combined "do you agree?" question. Each area MUST get its own detailed presentation and its own AskUserQuestion call.

ANTI-PATTERN: Do NOT show full alternatives/pros/cons for the first area and then shortcut remaining areas to just a recommendation line + question. EVERY area gets the SAME level of detail — all alternatives with descriptions, pros, and cons. No exceptions.

ANTI-PATTERN: Do NOT batch multiple decision areas into one AskUserQuestion call. The tool accepts up to 4 questions per call — using that capacity here IS the documented failure mode. One call = one question = one decision area. The § 3 "group important decisions" guidance applies to subagent decisions_needed triage, NOT to convergence — convergence is strictly sequential.

1. Read outputs/solution-exploration.md
2. For each decision area sequentially — later areas may depend on earlier answers (a choice in area 1 can change which alternatives are even relevant in area 3), so do NOT pre-render or pre-ask later areas before the current one is answered. Output ALL of the following (steps a-d) BEFORE calling AskUserQuestion: a. Area header: area name and why this decision matters (1-2 sentences of context) b. Alternatives detail: For EVERY alternative in this area, show:
   • Name and description (2-3 sentences)
   • Pros (bullet list)
   • Cons (bullet list) c. Recommendation: which alternative is recommended and why (1 sentence) d. AskUserQuestion (exactly ONE question in this call): this area's alternatives as options (mark recommended with "(Recommended)") + "Need more info" option e. If user picks → record choice, move to next area f. If "Need more info" → present the detailed trade-off analysis for the requested alternative, then re-ask

SELF-CHECK before each AskUserQuestion: Did you output the alternatives with pros/cons for THIS area? If you only showed a recommendation line without listing all alternatives and their pros/cons, STOP and output the full detail before asking. Also: does this AskUserQuestion call contain exactly ONE question about exactly ONE area? If it has multiple questions, STOP and split.

3. After all areas resolved, present a brief summary of the chosen combination
4. Update state with chosen approaches per decision area

GATE CHECK: Verify that AskUserQuestion was called for EACH decision area. If any decision area was skipped for any reason (e.g., output file missing, read failure), STOP and resolve before continuing. Do NOT mark Phase 4 complete without user convergence on all decision areas.

→ MANDATORY GATE — fires regardless of permission mode, session-reminders, or prior approval patterns. Invoke AskUserQuestion now. Proceeding without a user response is a protocol violation (orchestrator-patterns.md § 2 / § 2.1).

AskUserQuestion - "Brainstorming complete. Continue to high-level design?"

Phase 5: High-Level Design

Phase entry self-check: Before executing this phase, locate the AskUserQuestion tool call from the preceding phase in this conversation. If you cannot point to its call ID, STOP and fire that gate now. State updates (completed_phases, TaskUpdate) without a corresponding AskUserQuestion call are protocol violations — never paper over a missed gate by updating state.

Purpose: Create architecture design from selected solution approach Execute: Orchestrator-Direct Hybrid Output: outputs/high-level-design.md, outputs/decision-log.md State: Update phase_summaries.phase-5

Skip if: design_enabled = false

Read references/design-techniques.md NOW using the Read tool — MADR format, ADR guidance, decision documentation patterns

Part A — Design Direction (Direct):

1. If Phase 4 ran: confirm selected approaches from convergence
2. If Phase 4 was skipped: use research report recommendations as design input
3. AskUserQuestion for any design preferences or constraints (e.g., "Any architectural constraints or preferences?")

Part B — Design Generation (Subagent):

ANTI-PATTERN: Do NOT generate C4 architecture diagrams or ADRs inline. The solution-designer agent has specialized architecture and MADR documentation capabilities.

INVOKE NOW: Use Task tool with subagent_type: maister:solution-designer

Context to pass (Pattern 7):

• task_path, synthesis_path, research_report_path
• solution_exploration_path (only if Phase 3-4 ran)
• selected_approach (from Phase 4 convergence if ran, or from research report recommendations)
• design_preferences (from Part A)
• html_style_guide_path (for the high-level-design.html + decision-log.html companions)
• Accumulated context: research_type, research_question, confidence_level, phase_summaries
• project_doc_paths (from state)

SELF-CHECK: After Task tool returns, verify both outputs/high-level-design.md and outputs/decision-log.md exist. If missing: STOP. Do NOT proceed to Part C. Re-invoke the designer with corrected context. If second attempt also fails, use AskUserQuestion to report the failure and ask whether to retry or skip design.

Part C — Summary (Direct): 3. Read outputs/high-level-design.md and outputs/decision-log.md 4. Present executive summary to user:

• Architecture style and key components
• Number of architectural decisions recorded
• Key decision highlights (1 line each)
• Integration points with existing system (if applicable)

→ MANDATORY GATE — fires regardless of permission mode, session-reminders, or prior approval patterns. Invoke AskUserQuestion now. Proceeding without a user response is a protocol violation (orchestrator-patterns.md § 2 / § 2.1).

AskUserQuestion - "Design complete. Continue to output generation?"

Phase 6: Completion

Phase entry self-check: Before executing this phase, locate the AskUserQuestion tool call from the preceding phase in this conversation. If you cannot point to its call ID, STOP and fire that gate now. State updates (completed_phases, TaskUpdate) without a corresponding AskUserQuestion call are protocol violations — never paper over a missed gate by updating state.

Purpose: Summarize research results and suggest next steps Execute: Direct Output: No new files — summarizes existing outputs

Process:

1. Inventory all generated outputs: outputs/research-report.md (always), plus conditional: solution-exploration.md, high-level-design.md, decision-log.md
2. Present executive summary to user:
   • Key findings and confidence level
   • Which optional phases ran (brainstorming, design)
   • Key decision highlights (if brainstorming/design ran)
3. If design artifacts exist, suggest starting development in a fresh session:

   To start development based on this research, clear context first or start a new session, then run:
   /maister:development [task-path]
   

→ End of workflow

Domain Context (State Extensions)

Research-specific fields in orchestrator-state.yml:

research_context:
  research_type: "technical" | "requirements" | "literature" | "mixed"
  research_question: "[user's question]"
  scope:
    included: []
    excluded: []
    constraints: []
  methodology: []
  sources: []
  confidence_level: "high" | "medium" | "low"
  gathering_strategy:
    categories: []       # e.g., ["codebase", "documentation", "external-apis"]
    count: 4             # number of gatherer instances
    source: "planner" | "default"  # where strategy came from
  phase_summaries:
    # Every entry also carries the shared base shape (orchestrator-patterns.md § 4):
    #   decisions: []   risks: []   artifacts: [{path, label, html}]
    phase-1:
      summary: "..."
      steps_completed: []  # track which steps completed for resume
    phase-3:
      summary: "..."
    phase-4:
      summary: "..."
      decision_areas: []        # list of {area, alternatives_count, chosen_approach}
      deferred_ideas: []
    phase-5:
      summary: "..."
      architecture_style: null
      decisions_count: 0

options:
  html_output: true  # Seeded from .maister/config.yml at init (default true). Gates dashboard + HTML companions.
  brainstorming_enabled: null  # null=not yet decided, set by Phase 2 or --brainstorm/--no-brainstorm flag
  design_enabled: null          # independent, set by Phase 2 or --design/--no-design flag

Task Structure

.maister/tasks/research/YYYY-MM-DD-research-name/
├── orchestrator-state.yml
├── dashboard.html                  # Operator dashboard (copied plugin asset — never model-generated)
├── dashboard-data.js               # Dashboard data projection (rewritten after each phase/step/gate)
├── planning/
│   ├── research-brief.md           # Phase 1, Step 1
│   ├── research-plan.md            # Phase 1, Step 2
│   └── sources.md                  # Phase 1, Step 2
├── analysis/
│   ├── findings/
│   │   ├── codebase-*.md           # Phase 1, Step 3
│   │   ├── docs-*.md               # Phase 1, Step 3
│   │   ├── config-*.md             # Phase 1, Step 3
│   │   ├── external-*.md           # Phase 1, Step 3
│   │   └── [custom-category]-*.md  # Phase 1, Step 3 (dynamic categories)
│   └── synthesis.md                # Phase 1, Step 4 (reasoning log)
├── outputs/
│   ├── research-report.md          # Phase 1, Step 4 (main deliverable)
│   ├── research-report.html        # Phase 1, Step 4 (HTML companion)
│   ├── solution-exploration.md     # Phase 3 (conditional)
│   ├── solution-exploration.html   # Phase 3 (HTML companion)
│   ├── high-level-design.md        # Phase 5 (conditional)
│   ├── high-level-design.html      # Phase 5 (HTML companion)
│   ├── decision-log.md             # Phase 5 (conditional)
│   └── decision-log.html           # Phase 5 (HTML companion)

Auto-Recovery

Integration with Other Workflows

As Standalone Research

Command: /maister:research [research-question] Flow: Complete all phases, save outputs in task directory

As Embedded Research Phase

Invoked by: development orchestrator, migration orchestrator

Integration:

1. Parent orchestrator invokes research skill
2. Research executes phases 1-5 (skip Phase 6 completion — parent orchestrator handles next steps)
3. Design outputs fed into parent's specification phase
4. Research report saved in parent task's analysis/research/ directory

Handoff:

research_outputs:
  research_report: "[path to outputs/research-report.md]"
  findings_directory: "[path to analysis/findings/]"
  solution_exploration: "[path to outputs/solution-exploration.md]"
  high_level_design: "[path to outputs/high-level-design.md]"
  decision_log: "[path to outputs/decision-log.md]"

Command Integration

Invoked via:

• /maister:research [question] [--type=TYPE] [--brainstorm] [--no-brainstorm] [--design] [--no-design] (new)
• /maister:research [task-path] [--from=PHASE] (resume)

Brainstorming flags:

• --brainstorm: Force brainstorming phase (auto-resolves Phase 2 brainstorming decision to "enable")
• --no-brainstorm: Skip brainstorming phase
• Neither: Phase 2 presents recommendation and asks user

Design flags:

• --design: Force high-level design phase (auto-resolves Phase 2 design decision to "enable")
• --no-design: Skip high-level design phase
• Neither: Phase 2 presents recommendation and asks user

Task directory: .maister/tasks/research/YYYY-MM-DD-task-name/