myco-live-smoke-testing

star 438

Activate this skill when running, interpreting, extending, or debugging the live hardware smoke test harness in `scripts/live_smoke.py`. Covers all aspects of manifest-driven live testing against real UniFi hardware: .env credential setup, tool classification tiers, --phase flag selection to bound blast radius, the human-in-the-loop confirmation gate for mutations, artifact interpretation in live-smoke-results/, adding new tools to the harness, and recognizing known API contract failure patterns that mock-based CI cannot catch. Apply this skill even if the user doesn't explicitly ask about the harness — activate whenever a PR requires live smoke evidence, a new tool category needs coverage, or an API contract mismatch is suspected. CRITICAL: Treat live smoke as a PRE-MERGE BLOCKING GATE when code changes API response parsing (new fields, filtering logic, payload normalization).

sirkirby By sirkirby schedule Updated 6/14/2026

name: myco:live-smoke-testing description: | Activate this skill when running, interpreting, extending, or debugging the live hardware smoke test harness in scripts/live_smoke.py. Covers all aspects of manifest-driven live testing against real UniFi hardware: .env credential setup, tool classification tiers, --phase flag selection to bound blast radius, the human-in-the-loop confirmation gate for mutations, artifact interpretation in live-smoke-results/, adding new tools to the harness, and recognizing known API contract failure patterns that mock-based CI cannot catch. Apply this skill even if the user doesn't explicitly ask about the harness — activate whenever a PR requires live smoke evidence, a new tool category needs coverage, or an API contract mismatch is suspected. CRITICAL: Treat live smoke as a PRE-MERGE BLOCKING GATE when code changes API response parsing (new fields, filtering logic, payload normalization). managed_by: myco user-invocable: true allowed-tools: Read, Edit, Write, Bash, Grep, Glob

Live Smoke Testing Against Real UniFi Hardware

scripts/live_smoke.py is the manifest-driven live hardware test harness. It validates API contracts that mock-based CI (unit tests, golden fixtures) structurally cannot catch — auth token expiry, payload normalization, API version mismatches, and hardware-specific field assumptions. Phase 2 live smoke runs caught 3 critical bugs before merge. Run live smoke before every major merge that touches API-facing code.

Prerequisites

Before any live run, ensure:

  1. .env file at project root (gitignored) with real credentials:

    UNIFI_HOST=<controller-hostname-or-ip>
    UNIFI_USERNAME=<admin-username>
    UNIFI_PASSWORD=<admin-password>
    UNIFI_SITE=<site-id>           # usually "default"
    # For Access domain:
    UNIFI_ACCESS_API_KEY=<access-api-key>
    
  2. Per-server tools_manifest.json is up-to-date — the harness auto-discovers tools from each server's manifest. During development, verify your local module's manifest is current:

    # Check where each server's manifest is located
    find . -name "tools_manifest.json" -type f
    

    New tools registered in the manifest are automatically included in smoke runs; no manual harness edits are needed just to add read-only or preview coverage for a newly registered tool. If adding a new tool, verify the manifest entry exists and safety_tier() classification is correct (see Procedure A).

  3. Target hardware is reachable — verify connectivity before running:

    curl -k https://$UNIFI_HOST
    
  4. Branch context — the harness lives in scripts/live_smoke.py on the main branch. When branching or bisecting, confirm you have the current harness code before running.

  5. Git worktree .env placementscripts/live_smoke.py derives its repo root from its own file location (Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]) and loads .env from that root. In a git worktree the root resolves to the worktree directory, NOT the main checkout. Copy or symlink your credentials file from the main checkout into the worktree root before running:

    ln -s /path/to/main-checkout/.env /path/to/worktree/.env
    

    Omitting this causes silent credential-not-found failures with no warning.

Procedure 0: PRE-MERGE BLOCKING GATE — API Response Parsing Changes

Trigger Criteria — Live Smoke is Mandatory Before Merge:

Code changes in any of these categories require a pre-merge live smoke run that must PASS before the PR can be merged:

  • Manager response normalization logic — changes to how API response payloads are converted to domain models (e.g., field mapping, null handling, type coercion in manager classes)
  • New API response fields — adding handling for fields that are new to the UniFi API or new to a particular controller firmware version
  • Filtering or field selection logic — changes to which fields are extracted from responses, or conditional inclusion/exclusion of fields based on hardware or firmware state
  • Payload shape transformation — restructuring nested payloads, flattening, or re-nesting fields for compatibility with domain models
  • Version-dependent API contracts — changes that assume an API endpoint behaves differently across firmware versions

Why this is a blocking gate: Mock-based CI uses golden fixtures (static JSON files) that cannot evolve with real hardware firmware updates. Changes to response parsing are invisible to unit tests — they pass against the fixed fixture forever, but fail against real hardware running a different API version. The 2026-05-17 Access proxy incident (#283) exemplifies this: unit tests passed; live hardware returned auth-wrapped-in-200 errors invisible to mocks.

Ship doctrine — verify the changed code path, not an adjacent green path: Smoke evidence only counts if it exercises the specific code modified by the PR. If your PR touches the alarm manager, a passing run that exercises only the client manager is not evidence. Identify the tools that invoke the changed code and name them explicitly in the PR smoke evidence block.

Execution:

# For the affected domain(s) (e.g., network, protect, access):
python scripts/live_smoke.py --server <domain> --phase readonly
python scripts/live_smoke.py --server <domain> --phase safe
# Both must exit status 0 with no failed/exception records in artifacts

Sign-off: Include in the PR description:

**Live Smoke Evidence:**
- ✓ network readonly: 45 tools, 0 failures
- ✓ network safe: 12 lifecycle ops, 0 failures
- Artifacts: [link to live-smoke-results/{server}-{timestamp}.json]

The PR reviewer must confirm both phases passed and inspect the artifact for correct payloads before approving merge. This is equivalent to a code review checkpoint — it verifies API contract assumptions against reality before the code lands on main.

Procedure A: Understand Tool Classification Tiers

The harness classifies tools dynamically from manifest annotations and the RISKY_OPERATION_NAMES set (line ~90 in scripts/live_smoke.py). safety_tier() on LiveSmokeRunner drives phase inclusion.

Tier (safety_tier value) How it's determined Run gate
read_only readOnlyHint: true annotation in manifest Included in readonly and safe phases
preview_or_safe_lifecycle Has confirm param; not in RISKY_OPERATION_NAMES Preview (confirm=False) in preview/safe; lifecycle pairs in lifecycle/safe
requires_approval In RISKY_OPERATION_NAMES set OR destructiveHint: true Excluded from automated runs; listed in pending_approval; manual only
defer_heavy_read In STREAM_OR_HEAVY_READS set (streaming/export tools) Skipped unless --include-heavy-reads passed
mutating_requires_review Has writes but no confirm param and not explicitly risky Flagged for manual review

Classification is driven by manifest annotations — not static tier lists. When in doubt, set destructiveHint: true on the tool's ToolAnnotations. A tool missing readOnlyHint that does only reads is silently treated as mutating; fix the annotation.

Procedure B: Run the Harness with --phase Control

The --phase flag bounds blast radius. The --server flag is required for all MCP-direct phases. Always start at the safest phase and advance only after the prior phase passes cleanly.

# Safest run — readonly + preview + safe lifecycles (default phase is "safe")
python scripts/live_smoke.py --server network --phase safe

# Read-only tools only (narrowest scope)
python scripts/live_smoke.py --server network --phase readonly

# Preview phase — all mutating tools called with confirm=False
python scripts/live_smoke.py --server protect --phase preview

# Approved operations — runs all safe lifecycles plus explicitly approved mutations
python scripts/live_smoke.py --server network --phase approved

# Run all servers at once (requires full .env with Access and Protect creds)
python scripts/live_smoke.py --server all --phase safe

# Inventory — prints safety_tier classification for every tool; no live calls
python scripts/live_smoke.py --server network --phase inventory

Phase progression guidance:

  • Start every new tool or hardware target with --phase readonly.
  • Advance to --phase safe only after readonly passes cleanly.
  • Advance to --phase approved only after safe passes cleanly.
  • Never skip directly to approved on a first run against a new tool or new hardware.
  • Use --phase inventory to audit tier assignments without making any live calls.
  • Phase scope has expanded over the project lifecycle: Phase 1 was intentionally narrow (deployment/auth only, no controller-touching); Phase 2 added full Protect physical actions and Access lock/unlock patterns. Expect further expansion for each new REST endpoint domain.

Expected output: The harness streams per-tool status to stdout. A passing run exits with a summary count. Any failed or exception status line requires investigation before merge.

Procedure C: Human-in-the-Loop Mutation Gate

Mutation tools require a two-stage human gate. The preview phase (included in safe) handles Stage 1 automatically; Stage 2 requires human review before running --phase approved.

Stage 1 — Preview phase (harness does this automatically during safe/preview):

The harness calls all preview_or_safe_lifecycle tools with confirm=False. This returns a preview payload without executing any write. Review the output in the terminal and in the per-server artifact file in live-smoke-results/.

Stage 2 — Human approval, then approved phase:

# After reviewing Stage 1 preview output, if all looks correct:
python scripts/live_smoke.py --server network --phase approved

The approved phase runs explicitly coded lifecycle methods (e.g., lifecycle_network_dns(), lifecycle_network_oon_policy()) that execute idempotent create+delete pairs with confirm=True.

Rules:

  • Never skip Stage 1 — even for tools you've run before, always review the preview against current hardware state. A lifecycle run against stale assumptions can leave orphaned resources on the controller.
  • If the preview shows unexpected scope, wrong site, or wrong resource count, stop. Investigate the tool's argument construction before proceeding to approved.
  • Safe-lifecycle runs should leave zero net hardware changes. After an approved run, verify the controller UI shows no orphaned test resources.

Disposable resource rule for destructive operations: When a lifecycle method exercises destructive operations (archive, bulk-delete, format), always target a disposable resource created specifically for that run (e.g., a DNS record named smoke-test-<timestamp>). Never run destructive smoke against a production resource. If a dedicated test resource cannot be guaranteed (e.g., hardware-bound resources like camera channels), add the tool to RISKY_OPERATION_NAMES to exclude it from automated phases and require explicit human approval.

Procedure D: Interpret Artifacts in live-smoke-results/

Each run writes one JSON file per server, stamped with a timestamp:

live-smoke-results/{server}-{timestamp}.json

The file contains a SmokeReport serialized as JSON:

{
  "server": "network",
  "started_at": "2026-05-01T12:00:00+00:00",
  "finished_at": "2026-05-01T12:03:45+00:00",
  "connected": true,
  "records": [
    {
      "tool": "unifi_list_clients",
      "phase": "readonly",
      "status": "ok",
      "args": {},
      "duration_ms": 342,
      "success": true,
      "error": null,
      "summary": { ... }
    }
  ],
  "created_resources": [],
  "cleaned_resources": [],
  "pending_approval": []
}

Status values per record:

  • "ok" — tool completed; success is true; inspect summary for shape correctness.
  • "failed" — tool returned success: false; check error field.
  • "skipped" — tool excluded from current phase or args unavailable; not a failure.
  • "exception" — Python exception raised during invocation; check error for traceback.

API contract mismatches show up in summary content, not always as "failed". For example, an Access proxy returning HTTP 200 with an auth-failure body: status is "ok" but success is false or summary contains no usable data. Always inspect summary content and pending_approval, not just the overall status counts.

Confirmed API contract failure patterns (discovered through live testing; mocks did not catch any of these):

Pattern Symptom in artifact Root cause
Access proxy auth masking status: ok, empty/error summary Token expiry → proxy returns 404 wrapped in 200
OON payload normalization Create succeeds, object malformed Manager-side shape translation required; API expects different field structure
Alarm archive preview semantics Preview count ≠ actual archived count Mismatch between filter used in preview vs. execution
hardware_platform field assumption Field missing or wrong type on some models Not all hardware versions expose this field
Network alerts/IPS API version incompatibility 404 or schema error on known endpoint Endpoint path changed between controller firmware versions
Access CODE_UNAUTHORIZED ambiguity Same error code for expired token vs. wrong credentials Cannot distinguish root cause without inspecting response body detail

When you see a live smoke failure with no corresponding unit test failure, assume API contract mismatch first. Inspect the full summary body before looking at tool logic.

Procedure E: Extend the Harness for New Tools

When a new tool is scaffolded and registered in the server's tools_manifest.json, extend the harness as follows:

  1. Run inventory to see current classification:

    python scripts/live_smoke.py --server network --phase inventory | grep unifi_new_thing
    

    Confirm safety_tier matches your intent. Classification is driven automatically by manifest annotations — check the tool's ToolAnnotations in the tool module.

  2. If the tool should be read_only: Ensure readOnlyHint=True is set on ToolAnnotations in the tool function. The harness will auto-include it in readonly phase. No harness edits needed.

  3. If the tool has a confirm param (preview/lifecycle): The harness auto-includes it in preview phase with confirm=False. For safe lifecycle testing (create+delete pair), add a new lifecycle method to the LiveSmokeRunner class in scripts/live_smoke.py and call it from run_lifecycles() or run_approved():

    async def lifecycle_network_new_thing(self) -> None:
        # 1. Create the resource
        create_rec = await self.call("unifi_create_new_thing", {...}, "lifecycle")
        if not create_rec.success:
            return
        resource_id = ...  # extract from create_rec.summary
        # 2. Delete it (idempotent cleanup)
        await self.call("unifi_delete_new_thing", {"id": resource_id, "confirm": True}, "lifecycle")
    
  4. If the tool is risky/destructive: Add it to RISKY_OPERATION_NAMES (the set at line ~90 in scripts/live_smoke.py) or set destructiveHint=True on ToolAnnotations. This moves it to pending_approval and excludes it from automated phases.

  5. Run read-only phase first, inspect the artifact:

    python scripts/live_smoke.py --server network --phase readonly
    cat live-smoke-results/network-*.json | python -m json.tool | grep -A5 unifi_new_thing
    

    Confirm status: "ok" and success: true and that summary has the expected shape.

  6. Advance to safe/approved phase after readonly passes cleanly.

  7. Document the tier classification in the PR description — reviewers need to know the blast-radius classification to sign off on the smoke evidence.

Procedure F: Probe Script Workflow and Image-Level Docker Smoke

Live hardware smoke catches API contract mismatches but requires real hardware access. Two additional regression layers run without hardware and catch regressions in the CI pipeline.

Probe-script layer (scripts/probe_*.py utilities):

Smaller-scope smoke scripts run against development builds without requiring full live hardware setup. These probe scripts verify:

  • Tool registration (manifest entries are syntactically valid)
  • Schema validation (schemas load and validators register)
  • Manager instantiation (DI/bootstrap sequence succeeds)
  • Tool function signatures (decorators and parameters match manifest)

Run probe scripts in any PR that touches tool registration or schema changes:

python scripts/probe_tools.py --server network
python scripts/probe_schemas.py

Probe failures are non-fatal for local development but become CI gates to catch early regressions before a full hardware run.

Image-level Docker smoke (Phase 3+ requirement):

The release build pipeline runs image-level smoke tests on generated Docker images before they're pushed to GHCR. This tests:

  • All three app servers start cleanly inside their respective images
  • All tools are discoverable in each image's tools_manifest.json
  • Basic connectivity to a mock controller (localhost loopback) succeeds

Image-level smoke does not execute tool logic (no live hardware), but it catches import errors, missing dependencies, manifest corruption, and startup failures that only appear in the final release image.

This layer lives in CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions), not in developer workflows. Local equivalents can be tested with:

docker build -t unifi-network:dev -f Dockerfile.network . && \
  docker run --rm unifi-network:dev python -c "from unifi_network_mcp import *; print('OK')"

Four-layer regression model:

  1. Unit/fixture layer — mock data, schema validation, bootstrap (fast, pre-commit)
  2. Probe-script layer — tool registration, manifest, schema instantiation (minutes, pre-push)
  3. Live smoke layer — API contract verification on real hardware (manual gate, code review)
  4. Image-level layer — Docker build, startup, manifest integrity (release gate, CI pipeline)

Each layer adds cost but catches distinct classes of regressions. The first three run in developer workflows; the fourth is automated in the release pipeline.

Cross-Cutting Gotchas

  • Mock + golden fixtures are insufficient by design. Live smoke is the only mechanism that catches auth token expiry, real payload shapes, hardware-specific fields, and API version skew. Treat live smoke as a required quality gate, not optional extra validation.

  • .env is gitignored — never commit credentials. If you see UNIFI_HOST or UNIFI_PASSWORD in a diff, abort the commit immediately and rotate the credentials.

  • --server is required for all MCP-direct phases. Omitting it causes a parse error. api-actions, api-resources, and api-streams phases use a different runner and do not require --server.

  • api-actions and api-resources use curated subsets, not auto-discovery. API_ACTIONS_SAMPLE in scripts/live_smoke.py is a hardcoded list of 6 tools (network clients/devices, protect cameras/lights, access doors/users). New tools are NOT automatically included in --phase api-actions coverage. To add a new tool to the api-actions phase, explicitly append it to API_ACTIONS_SAMPLE. Do not assume successful MCP-direct smoke implies api-actions coverage.

  • --phase safe exercises default args only — it is a regression detector, not full coverage. The harness calls every tool with its default argument values. New optional parameters added to existing tools are not exercised by the safe phase. After a PR that adds optional parameters, run a targeted second pass: write a short script under scripts/ that calls the tool with each new non-default value and asserts on the response shape. Delete after verification.

  • HA/shadow mode transient failures are environment issues, not code bugs. If live smoke fails with "resource temporarily unavailable," "sync in progress," or similar, verify the HA cluster has stabilized before investigating the tool. Retry after 30–60 seconds. Do not block merge on HA transient failures — note them in the PR with a re-run confirmation.

  • Phase 2 baseline is 56 passing approved-ops. This count was established during Phase 2 development. A PR that drops the count or introduces new failures requires a documented explanation and fix before merge.

  • Credential rotation invalidates prior artifacts. If credentials changed between runs, artifacts from prior runs cannot be used as PR evidence. Re-run from scratch.

  • Phase scope expands with each new domain. Phase 1 deliberately excluded controller-touching endpoints; Phase 2 added them. Phase 3 will require harness expansion for new REST endpoints. Every new tool category must be classified and added — do not assume prior phases cover new domains.

  • tools_manifest.json is the source of truth for auto-discovery. Manifest annotation correctness (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint) and harness registration (for lifecycle methods) are both required. Wrong annotations silently misclassify tools.

  • AlarmRulesFacade fallback silently masks SuperAdmin credential failures. If the account lacks SuperAdmin on the Protect console, AlarmManagerPermissionError is caught by AlarmRulesFacade and it silently falls back to the legacy automations API. The smoke record shows status: ok — but the v2 code path was never exercised. The complete flag in the MCP _meta block distinguishes v2 success (complete: true) from legacy fallback (complete: false). When smoke-testing alarm rules, inspect the summary._meta block and confirm complete: true; a passing run with complete: false means v2 was never reached.

  • HTTP 404 from Access API-key endpoints confirms auth is working. When using API-key-authenticated Access endpoints, a 404 on a valid-format resource path means the key was accepted but the resource doesn't exist — this is a green credential signal. A 401/403 means the key was rejected. Use this to validate Access API key configuration: deliberately query a known-missing resource ID and expect 404, not 401.

  • HTTP 401 on the uiprotect bootstrap/WebSocket path during Protect smoke is expected and benign. The uiprotect library opens a WebSocket channel for real-time events using a cookie-based auth path that the MCP API key does not cover. A 401 on that WebSocket/bootstrap path does not indicate a problem with the REST API key — the REST path used by all MCP tool calls is healthy. When you see a 401 in Protect smoke output, check whether it's on the WebSocket bootstrap path before treating it as a real auth failure.

  • access_get_activity_summary CODE_SYSTEM_ERROR -3 on the Access activities histogram endpoint is a pre-existing controller issue, not a code bug. This error reproduces consistently across branches and controller firmware versions on affected controllers. It is a known upstream Access controller issue unrelated to MCP code changes. When this error appears in smoke results, treat it as an environment/controller issue: note it in the PR, re-run on a different controller if available, and do not block merge solely on this error.

Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/sirkirby/unifi-mcp --skill myco-live-smoke-testing
Repository Details
star Stars 438
call_split Forks 65
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator