recipe-prepare-implementation

name: recipe-prepare-implementation description: "Verify that an approved work plan is implementable before build execution, resolving readiness gaps through Phase 0 prep tasks when needed."

Required Skills [LOAD BEFORE EXECUTION]

1. [LOAD IF NOT ACTIVE] coding-rules -- coding standards
2. [LOAD IF NOT ACTIVE] testing -- test strategy and quality gates
3. [LOAD IF NOT ACTIVE] ai-development-guide -- AI development patterns
4. [LOAD IF NOT ACTIVE] documentation-criteria -- document templates
5. [LOAD IF NOT ACTIVE] subagents-orchestration-guide -- agent coordination
6. [LOAD IF NOT ACTIVE] llm-friendly-context -- clear prompts, handoffs, and generated artifacts

Spawn rule: every spawn_agent call MUST pass fork_turns="none" or fork_context=false for context isolation.

Purpose

Run this recipe after work-plan approval and before any build or implementation execution. It verifies that the plan can be executed from Phase 1 onward without missing verification references, test prerequisites, UI render surfaces, or local execution instructions.

The recipe is safe to invoke unconditionally. If all readiness criteria pass, it only updates the work plan readiness marker and report.

Work plan: $ARGUMENTS

Readiness Marker Contract

Use the Implementation Readiness Marker Contract defined in subagents-orchestration-guide. If the line is absent, treat the work plan as pending and insert it after Related Issue/PR: when persisting the report.

Readiness Criteria

Each criterion produces pass, fail, or not_applicable, with file:line evidence where possible.

R4 applies only to UI work. R5 applies when the plan uses a local service stack or browser harness.

Execution Flow

Step 1: Load Inputs

Read the work plan passed in $ARGUMENTS; if absent, select the most recent non-template docs/plans/*.md. Extract:

• Verification Strategies
• Quality Assurance Mechanisms
• Design-to-Plan Traceability
• Reference Contract Values
• ADR Bindings
• UI Spec Component -> Task Mapping
• Connection Map
• test skeleton references and E2E absence reasons
• phase structure and task IDs
• referenced Design Docs, ADRs, and UI Specs

If no work plan exists, stop and report the missing prerequisite.

Step 2: Readiness Scan

Evaluate R1-R5 using repository search and the work plan content. Build a ## Implementation Readiness Report regardless of outcome.

For each fail, identify the smallest concrete prep task that closes the gap. Examples:

• Add fixture data for a UI state
• Add an API mock handler for fixture-e2e
• Add a seed script for service-integration-e2e
• Add a Storybook story, dev route, or equivalent render surface
• Document local startup commands and required environment variables
• Add a missing verification helper or script referenced by the plan

Step 3: No-Op Success

When all applicable criteria are pass:

1. Persist ## Implementation Readiness Report in the work plan immediately after the header block.
2. Set Implementation Readiness: ready.
3. Do not create task files.
4. Report outcome: ready.

Step 4: Create Resolution Tasks

When one or more criteria fail:

1. Present the proposed prep tasks to the user and continue only after explicit approval.
   • If the user declines prep execution, persist Implementation Readiness: escalated with the current Readiness Report and stop before creating prep task files.
2. Create task files in docs/plans/tasks/ using the task template:
   • Backend prep: {plan-name}-backend-task-prep-{NN}.md
   • Frontend prep: {plan-name}-frontend-task-prep-{NN}.md
   • Single-layer prep: {plan-name}-task-prep-{NN}.md
3. Insert the tasks into the work plan's existing Phase 0 when one exists. If no Phase 0 exists, create Phase 0: Implementation Readiness Prep before Phase 1. Keep existing Phase 0 task IDs stable; assign prep task IDs after existing Phase 0 tasks or use a clearly labeled P0-PREP-N identifier when the plan's numbering would otherwise require renumbering.
4. Each prep task must include Investigation Targets, concrete implementation steps, and Operation Verification Methods.

Layer selection:

• Use frontend prep when every target is UI, browser harness, component, page, or frontend fixture work.
• Use backend prep when every target is API, server, service, repository, database, seed, or backend fixture work.
• Use single-layer prep for non-layered repositories.
• Escalate if the gap crosses layers and cannot be split into separate prep tasks.

Step 5: Execute Prep Tasks

Run each prep task through the standard 4-step cycle:

1. Spawn the layer-appropriate task executor with the exact prep task path in the prompt: "Execute implementation-readiness prep task. Task file: [exact prep task path]."
2. Check for blocked or escalation_needed.
3. Spawn the layer-appropriate quality fixer with the task file as task_file.
4. Commit only when the quality fixer returns approved.

Append this scope boundary to every subagent prompt:

[SYSTEM CONSTRAINT]
This agent operates within implementation-readiness prep scope. Use the task file as the primary instruction source. Do not implement feature behavior beyond the readiness gap described by the task.

Step 6: Re-Scan and Persist

After prep tasks are complete:

1. Re-run the readiness scan.
2. Persist or replace ## Implementation Readiness Report in the work plan.
3. Set the header to Implementation Readiness: ready when all applicable criteria pass, otherwise Implementation Readiness: escalated.
4. Collapse completed prep tasks out of active plan execution: remove the Phase 0 readiness prep task entries from the work plan and record their committed evidence under Resolution Tasks Executed in the Readiness Report. If Phase 0 becomes empty and was created only by this recipe, remove that Phase 0 section. Preserve any pre-existing Phase 0 content.
5. Delete only these files for the current {plan-name}:
   • docs/plans/tasks/{plan-name}-task-prep-*.md
   • docs/plans/tasks/{plan-name}-backend-task-prep-*.md
   • docs/plans/tasks/{plan-name}-frontend-task-prep-*.md
   • docs/plans/tasks/{plan-name}-phase0-completion.md
6. Report remaining gaps if any.

Readiness Report Format

## Implementation Readiness Report

Work plan: [path]
Outcome: ready | escalated
Gaps resolved: [N]
phase0_created_by_recipe: true | false

### Readiness Criteria

| ID | Result | Evidence |
|----|--------|----------|
| R1 | pass / fail / not_applicable | [file:line or missing reference] |
| R2 | ... | ... |
| R3 | ... | ... |
| R4 | ... | ... |
| R5 | ... | ... |

### Resolution Tasks Executed
- [task file path] - [one-line summary] - committed

### Remaining Gaps
- [criterion ID]: [unresolved reference] - Next action: [recommendation]

Completion Criteria

• Work plan loaded and relevant sections extracted
• Readiness scan completed with evidence per criterion
• No-op success handled when all criteria pass
• Failing criteria converted to approved prep tasks when needed
• Prep tasks executed through executor -> quality-fixer -> commit
• Re-scan completed after prep tasks
• Work plan readiness marker updated to ready or escalated
• Readiness Report persisted in the work plan
• Completed prep task references collapsed into the Readiness Report
• Prep task files created by this recipe removed from docs/plans/tasks/