procurement-docs

star 1.0k

A procurement document set generation pipeline. An agent team collaborates to produce requirements definitions, vendor comparisons, evaluation criteria, contract terms, and acceptance criteria. Use this skill for 'create procurement documents', 'vendor comparison', 'procurement specifications', 'evaluation criteria', 'acceptance criteria', 'procurement documents', 'bid evaluation', 'RFP creation', 'vendor selection', and similar procurement/sourcing document topics. Actual ordering, contract execution, payment processing, and asset registration are out of scope.

revfactory By revfactory schedule Updated 3/22/2026

name: procurement-docs description: "A procurement document set generation pipeline. An agent team collaborates to produce requirements definitions, vendor comparisons, evaluation criteria, contract terms, and acceptance criteria. Use this skill for 'create procurement documents', 'vendor comparison', 'procurement specifications', 'evaluation criteria', 'acceptance criteria', 'procurement documents', 'bid evaluation', 'RFP creation', 'vendor selection', and similar procurement/sourcing document topics. Actual ordering, contract execution, payment processing, and asset registration are out of scope."

Procurement Docs — Procurement Document Set Generation Pipeline

Generates procurement requirements, vendor comparisons, evaluation criteria, contract term reviews, and acceptance criteria through agent team collaboration.

Execution Mode

Agent Team — 5 members communicate directly via SendMessage and cross-validate each other's work.

Agent Roster

Agent File Role Type
requirements-definer .claude/agents/requirements-definer.md Specifications, quantity, delivery, budget general-purpose
vendor-comparator .claude/agents/vendor-comparator.md Candidate research, comparison tables, SWOT general-purpose
evaluation-designer .claude/agents/evaluation-designer.md Scoring, weighting, evaluation process general-purpose
contract-reviewer .claude/agents/contract-reviewer.md Clauses, risks, SLA, negotiation general-purpose
acceptance-builder .claude/agents/acceptance-builder.md Inspection items, testing, pass criteria general-purpose

Workflow

Phase 1: Preparation (performed directly by the orchestrator)

  1. Extract from user input:
    • Procurement target: Goods, software, services, construction, etc.
    • Procurement context: New introduction, replacement, expansion, etc.
    • Budget: Budget range or limit
    • Timeline: Desired delivery date, project schedule
    • Vendor candidates (optional): Vendors already under consideration
    • Existing documents (optional): Existing specifications, contract drafts
  2. Create the _workspace/ directory in the project root
  3. Organize the input and save to _workspace/00_input.md
  4. Determine the execution mode based on the request scope

Phase 2: Team Assembly and Execution

Order Task Owner Dependencies Deliverable
1 Requirements definition definer None _workspace/01_requirements_spec.md
2 Vendor comparison comparator Task 1 _workspace/02_vendor_comparison.md
3a Evaluation criteria evaluator Tasks 1, 2 _workspace/03_evaluation_criteria.md
3b Contract review contract Tasks 1, 2 _workspace/04_contract_review.md
4 Acceptance criteria acceptance Tasks 1, 3b _workspace/05_acceptance_criteria.md

Tasks 3a (evaluation) and 3b (contract) run in parallel.

Inter-team communication flow:

  • definer completes → sends requirements/budget to comparator, priorities/criteria to evaluator, delivery/support terms to contract, must-have requirements/criteria to acceptance
  • comparator completes → sends vendor info/comparison items to evaluator, license/clause highlights to contract
  • contract completes → sends acceptance conditions/warranty to acceptance
  • Orchestrator performs final cross-document consistency validation

Phase 3: Integration and Final Deliverables

  1. Verify all files in _workspace/
  2. Cross-validation:
    • All must-have requirements are reflected in acceptance criteria
    • Evaluation criteria weight totals equal 100%
    • Contract terms align with requirements/acceptance criteria
    • Vendor comparison items map to requirements
  3. Generate procurement summary report at _workspace/06_procurement_summary.md
  4. Report the final summary to the user

Execution Modes by Scope

User Request Pattern Execution Mode Agents Involved
"Create complete procurement documents" Full Pipeline All 5
"Just write the requirements spec" Spec Mode definer solo
"Just compare vendors" Comparison Mode definer + comparator
"Just create evaluation criteria" Evaluation Mode definer + evaluator
"Review this contract" Review Mode contract solo
"Just create acceptance criteria" Acceptance Mode definer + acceptance

Data Transfer Protocol

Strategy Method Usage
File-based _workspace/ directory Primary deliverable storage and sharing
Message-based SendMessage Real-time key information transfer, correction requests
Task-based TaskCreate/TaskUpdate Progress tracking, dependency management

Error Handling

Error Type Strategy
Unclear procurement target definer presents clarifying question list, works from answers
Insufficient vendor info comparator provides RFI template when web search fails, requests user direct input
Budget undetermined Estimate budget range based on market prices, proceed after user confirmation
Legal review needed contract tags with "[Legal review needed]", warns cannot replace legal counsel
Agent failure 1 retry → proceed without that deliverable if still failing, note in report

Test Scenarios

Normal Flow

Prompt: "Create a procurement document set for cloud server hosting services. Budget is $500K/year and I want to compare AWS, Azure, and GCP." Expected Results:

  • Spec: Compute/storage/network requirements, SLA requirements
  • Comparison: 3-provider feature/price/support comparison, TCO analysis, SWOT
  • Evaluation: Technical 40% / Price 30% / Support 20% / Reliability 10% scoring
  • Contract: SLA clauses, data sovereignty, termination terms, negotiation points
  • Acceptance: Infrastructure deployment acceptance, performance testing, SLA compliance verification

Existing File Flow

Prompt: "I already have a spec. Just create vendor comparison and evaluation criteria." + spec file Expected Results:

  • Existing spec copied to _workspace/01_requirements_spec.md
  • Comparison + evaluation mode: comparator + evaluator deployed
  • Vendor comparison and evaluation criteria generated from spec

Error Flow

Prompt: "I need to buy something but don't know what, maybe work laptops?" Expected Results:

  • definer presents clarifying questions (use case, number of users, performance needs, etc.)
  • Requirements derived from user responses
  • Market price range presented if budget is undetermined
  • Report notes "Requirements confirmation needed"

Agent Extension Skills

Extension Skill Path Target Agent Role
vendor-scoring .claude/skills/vendor-scoring/skill.md vendor-comparator, evaluation-designer Vendor evaluation scorecard, pricing formulas, reference checks
contract-checklist .claude/skills/contract-checklist/skill.md contract-reviewer, acceptance-builder Contract 10 key clauses, SLA design, acceptance criteria
Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/revfactory/harness-100 --skill procurement-docs
Repository Details
star Stars 1,011
call_split Forks 366
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator