decision-maker

star 16

Helps make high-quality decisions using proven frameworks from top experts. Use when: deciding between options, facing difficult choices, setting up decision processes, running pre-mortems, determining when to quit/continue, or needing group input on a decision. Includes: SPADE, Nominal Group, Kill Criteria, Pre-Mortem, Opportunity Cost frameworks. Sources: Gokul Rajaram, Annie Duke, Shreyas Doshi.

qingxuantang By qingxuantang schedule Updated 1/19/2026

name: decision-maker description: | Helps make high-quality decisions using proven frameworks from top experts. Use when: deciding between options, facing difficult choices, setting up decision processes, running pre-mortems, determining when to quit/continue, or needing group input on a decision. Includes: SPADE, Nominal Group, Kill Criteria, Pre-Mortem, Opportunity Cost frameworks. Sources: Gokul Rajaram, Annie Duke, Shreyas Doshi.

Decision-Maker Skill

Help users make better decisions using proven frameworks from Lenny's Podcast experts.

When This Skill Activates

  • "Help me decide..."
  • "Should we do A or B?"
  • "How do we make this decision?"
  • "We need alignment on..."
  • "Should we continue this project?"
  • "When should we quit?"
  • "Run a pre-mortem"
  • "I can't choose between..."
  • "What's the opportunity cost?"

Framework Selection Guide

Situation Use This Framework
Big strategic decision with stakeholders SPADE
Need group input without groupthink Nominal Group
Deciding whether to continue/quit Kill Criteria
Assessing risks before launch Pre-Mortem
Comparing prioritization options Opportunity Cost

Framework 1: SPADE (Big Decisions)

Source: Gokul Rajaram - Lenny's Podcast Key Insight: Most decision delays come from unclear ownership and insufficient exploration of alternatives.

When to Use

  • Major product decisions
  • Strategic choices with significant tradeoffs
  • Cross-functional decisions requiring alignment
  • High-stakes, irreversible decisions
  • When decision ownership is unclear

Procedure

S - Setting (Define the context)

Template: "We need to decide [specific decision] by [date]
because [why it matters now]. Constraints: [list them]."

P - People (Assign roles)

  • Responsible: ONE decision-maker (not a committee)
  • Approvers: Must approve (keep minimal)
  • Consulted: Provide input
  • Informed: Told after decision

A - Alternatives (Generate options)

  • Create at least 3 alternatives (avoids false binary)
  • Always include "do nothing" as an option
  • Each must be viable with clear tradeoffs

D - Decide (Make the call)

  1. Gather input from Consulted parties
  2. Evaluate alternatives against criteria
  3. Decision-maker makes the call
  4. Get approval from Approvers
  5. Document decision and rationale

E - Explain (Communicate)

  • What was decided
  • Why this alternative was chosen
  • What alternatives were considered
  • What happens next

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Vague decision framing
  • Multiple decision-makers (pick ONE)
  • Only two alternatives (generate more)
  • Relitigating after decision is made

Framework 2: Nominal Group Method (Group Decisions)

Source: Annie Duke - Lenny's Podcast Key Insight: The only thing that should happen in a meeting is discussion—discovery and decisions should happen independently.

When to Use

  • Brainstorming sessions
  • Forecasting and estimation
  • Any group decision-making process
  • When you need diverse input without groupthink

Procedure

Step 1: Discover Independently (Before Meeting)

  • Send question to all participants
  • Each person responds privately (no reply-all)
  • Collect: their answer + brief rationale

Step 2: Aggregate and Share

  • Compile all responses anonymously or attributed
  • Highlight the spread of opinions
  • Share before the meeting

Step 3: Discuss in Meeting (Focus on Disagreements)

  • 80% of time on differences, not agreements
  • Facilitator reflects back without opinion
  • No interrupting, no "you're wrong"
  • Ask clarifying questions only

Step 4: Decide Independently (After Meeting)

  • Single decision-maker decides, OR
  • Independent vote (can't see others' votes)
  • Don't force "alignment"—it doesn't exist

Step 5: Use "Nevertheless"

"I've heard everyone's input. Nevertheless, we're going
to do X. Here's why..."

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Discovering opinions in the meeting (anchoring bias)
  • Letting loudest voice dominate
  • Seeking "alignment" (accept disagreement)
  • Senior person speaking first

Framework 3: Kill Criteria (When to Quit)

Source: Annie Duke - Lenny's Podcast Key Insight: Pre-mortems only work if paired with pre-committed actions you'll take when signals appear.

When to Use

  • Starting new projects or initiatives
  • Making investment decisions
  • Pursuing sales deals
  • Launching experiments
  • Any decision where you might need to quit later

Procedure

Step 1: Run Pre-Mortem

"Imagine it's [timeframe] from now and this has failed
completely. What were the early warning signals?"

Step 2: Categorize Signals

Category Response
Red Fatal—kill immediately
Yellow Serious—requires intervention
Orange Concerning—investigate

Step 3: Define Actions for Each Signal For each signal, specify:

  • What action to take (kill, pivot, investigate, escalate)
  • Who owns the action
  • Timeline to act

Step 4: Commit Before Launch

  • Review kill criteria with team
  • Get explicit agreement to act when signals appear
  • Document the commitments

Step 5: Monitor and Execute

  • Check for signals regularly
  • When signal appears: execute pre-committed action
  • No debate—time for debate was when setting criteria

Example Kill Criteria

Signal: Customer only discusses price, won't demo
Category: Red
Action: Kill the deal immediately
Owner: Account Executive
Reasoning: They're using us to beat up a competitor on price

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Setting criteria but not committing to act
  • Renegotiating when signal appears ("but it's different now")
  • Vague signals that can't be observed
  • No action owner assigned

Framework 4: Pre-Mortem Technique (Risk Assessment)

Source: Shreyas Doshi - Lenny's Podcast Key Insight: Imagining failure before it happens surfaces risks that optimism blinds us to.

When to Use

  • Before launching projects
  • Before major initiatives
  • When stakes are high
  • When team seems overconfident

Procedure

Step 1: Set the Scene

"Imagine it's 6 months from now. This project has failed
completely. What went wrong?"

Step 2: Individual Brainstorm (5-10 min)

  • Each person writes 3-5 failure scenarios independently
  • Include specific, concrete reasons
  • Don't share yet

Step 3: Aggregate and Categorize

  • Collect all failure scenarios
  • Group similar ones
  • Identify themes

Step 4: Prioritize Top Risks

  • Vote on most likely/impactful
  • Focus on top 3-5 risks

Step 5: Create Mitigation Plans For each top risk:

  • Prevention: How to reduce likelihood
  • Detection: How to spot it early
  • Response: What to do if it happens

Step 6: Set Kill Criteria (Optional)

  • Convert key risks into kill criteria
  • Pre-commit to actions

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Not making it independent (groupthink)
  • Stopping at identification (need mitigation)
  • Not following up on mitigations
  • Using it to justify not launching (that's not the point)

Framework 5: Opportunity Cost Mindset (Prioritization)

Source: Shreyas Doshi - Lenny's Podcast Key Insight: The true cost of doing something is everything else you can't do—not just the resources spent.

When to Use

  • Prioritization debates
  • Resource allocation decisions
  • "Should we do this?" discussions
  • When ROI analysis feels incomplete

Procedure

Step 1: Identify the Proposal

  • What's being proposed?
  • What resources does it require?
  • What's the expected outcome?

Step 2: List Alternatives (What You're NOT Doing)

  • What else could these resources accomplish?
  • What's the best alternative use?
  • Include "do nothing" and "do less"

Step 3: Compare Against Best Alternative Don't ask: "Is this worth doing?" Ask: "Is this MORE worth doing than the best alternative?"

Step 4: Factor in Hidden Costs

  • Context switching costs
  • Maintenance burden
  • Complexity added
  • Options foreclosed

Step 5: Factor in Hidden Benefits

  • Learning and optionality value
  • Platform/foundation value
  • Strategic positioning

Step 6: Make Explicit Tradeoff

"We're choosing to do X instead of Y because [reason].
We accept that Y won't happen."

The ROI Trap

  • ROI asks: "Does this return more than it costs?"
  • Problem: Everything with positive ROI looks good
  • Opportunity cost asks: "Is this the BEST use of resources?"

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Only looking at ROI (ignores alternatives)
  • Not quantifying what you're giving up
  • Treating decisions as independent (they're not)
  • Ignoring option value

How to Apply This Skill

  1. Listen for the decision type

    • Big strategic → SPADE
    • Group input needed → Nominal Group
    • Continue/quit → Kill Criteria
    • Risk assessment → Pre-Mortem
    • Prioritization → Opportunity Cost
  2. Walk through the selected framework step-by-step with the user

  3. Highlight relevant pitfalls based on their situation

  4. Offer to combine frameworks when appropriate (e.g., Pre-Mortem → Kill Criteria)

Related Skills

  • /strategy-advisor - For strategic direction questions
  • /goal-setter - For goal-setting and prioritization
  • /leadership-coach - For team decision dynamics

Full SOPs (Deep Dives)

Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/qingxuantang/Lennys-to-sop-and-skills --skill decision-maker
Repository Details
star Stars 16
call_split Forks 9
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator
qingxuantang
qingxuantang Explore all skills →