qa-quarto

star 1.3k

Adversarial Quarto-vs-Beamer parity QA. A critic agent compares the Quarto HTML render to the Beamer PDF benchmark for content/visual parity; a fixer agent applies fixes; loops until APPROVED (max 5 rounds). Use when user says "qa the quarto", "check parity", "does the html match the pdf?", "quarto matches beamer?", or after a translate-to-quarto run. Requires both the `.qmd` rendered and a `.pdf` benchmark.

pedrohcgs By pedrohcgs schedule Updated 6/9/2026

name: qa-quarto description: Adversarial Quarto-vs-Beamer parity QA. A critic agent compares the Quarto HTML render to the Beamer PDF benchmark for content/visual parity; a fixer agent applies fixes; loops until APPROVED (max 5 rounds). Use when user says "qa the quarto", "check parity", "does the html match the pdf?", "quarto matches beamer?", or after a translate-to-quarto run. Requires both the .qmd rendered and a .pdf benchmark. argument-hint: "[LectureN]" allowed-tools: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Write", "Edit", "Bash", "Task"] context: fork

Adversarial Quarto vs Beamer QA Workflow

Compare Quarto HTML slides against their Beamer PDF benchmark using an iterative critic/fixer loop.

Philosophy: The Beamer PDF is the gold standard. The Quarto translation must be at least as good in every dimension.


Workflow

Phase 0: Pre-flight → Phase 1: Critic audit → Phase 2: Fixer → Phase 3: Re-audit → Loop until APPROVED (max 5 rounds)

Hard Gates (Non-Negotiable)

Gate Condition
Overflow NO content cut off
Plot Quality Interactive charts >= static plots
Content Parity No missing slides/equations/text
Visual Regression Quarto >= Beamer in all dimensions
Slide Centering Content centered, no jumping
Notation Fidelity All math verbatim from Beamer

Phase 0: Pre-flight

  1. Locate Beamer (.tex/.pdf) and Quarto (.qmd/.html) files
  2. Check freshness (re-render if QMD newer than HTML)
  3. Verify TikZ SVGs if applicable

Phase 1: Initial Audit

Launch the quarto-critic agent to compare Beamer vs Quarto comprehensively. Report saved to quality_reports/[Lecture]_qa_critic_round1.md.

Phase 2: Fix Cycle

If not APPROVED, launch quarto-fixer agent to apply fixes (Critical → Major → Minor), re-render, and verify.

Phase 3: Re-Audit

Re-launch critic to verify fixes. Loop back to Phase 2 if needed.

Iteration Limits — loop-until-dry

This is the loop-until-dry primitive from orchestrator-protocol.md: the critic returns FINDINGs (the hard-gate table is the CRITICAL roll-up, per orchestration-schemas.md); the loop converges when a round adds 0 new CRITICAL/MAJOR findings (deduped on location+finding), not at a fixed round count.

  • Fallback cap: 5 rounds bounds a non-converging loop, then escalate to the user with remaining issues.
  • Two-strikes: the same gate failing in rounds N and N+2 is flagged for the user, not patched again (summary-parity.md).
  • APPROVED iff every hard gate passes (zero CRITICAL).

Final Report

Save to quality_reports/[Lecture]_qa_final.md with hard gate status, iteration summary, and remaining issues.

Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill qa-quarto
Repository Details
star Stars 1,263
call_split Forks 2,569
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator