hypothesis-review-summary

star 4

Summarize the completed reviews for a hypothesis.

panjose By panjose schedule Updated 6/11/2026

name: hypothesis-review-summary description: Summarize the completed reviews for a hypothesis.

hypothesis-review-summary

Goal:

  • Summarize the completed reviews for a hypothesis.

Inputs:

  • hypotheses/<id>/HYPOTHESIS.json
  • completed review artifacts under hypotheses/<id>/REVIEW/

Outputs:

  • hypotheses/<id>/REVIEW/REVIEW_SUMMARY.json

Context Loading:

  • Read hypotheses/<id>/HYPOTHESIS.json.
  • Read all completed review artifacts under hypotheses/<id>/REVIEW/.
  • Focus on synthesizing the strongest strengths, weaknesses, and recommended next actions across those reviews.

Execution Prompt Contract:

  • System Intent:
    • You are synthesizing the completed review stack into a compact downstream summary.
  • Required Reasoning Focus:
    • Deduplicate repeated points across review stages.
    • Preserve the most important strengths, weaknesses, and action items.
    • Prefer high-signal synthesis over exhaustive restatement.
  • Do Not Do:
    • Do not summarize reviews that do not exist.
    • Do not copy every review point verbatim.
    • Do not invent a new evaluation framework at summary time.
  • Review Quality Floor:
    • A status = completed review summary must synthesize concrete findings from completed review stages.
    • Include the strongest actionable strength, weakness, or next-step implication when those appear in prior reviews.
    • Do not use placeholder summary phrases such as Viable evolved hypothesis, Refined from parent, strong candidate, or needs validation as substantive summary content.
  • Output Shape:
    • Produce the exact ReviewSummaryContract from packages/agent_contracts/review.py.
    • Keep the summary as a compact list of downstream-usable points.
    • Each item in summaries must be a plain string, not an object with nested keys such as review_stage, outcome, or summary.

Execution Steps:

  1. Open skills/shared-references/schema-index.md, then read packages/agent_contracts/review.py and confirm the exact ReviewSummaryContract shape before writing REVIEW_SUMMARY.json.
  2. Read the current hypothesis and all completed review artifacts.
  3. Identify repeated themes and high-signal findings.
  4. Synthesize them into a compact summary list.
  5. Write hypotheses/<id>/REVIEW/REVIEW_SUMMARY.json.
  6. Validate before declaring completion.

Artifact Rules:

  • REVIEW_SUMMARY.json is a synthesis artifact, not a copy of all prior review text.
  • The summary must remain self-contained enough for downstream generation or ranking stages to consume quickly.

Completion Rule:

  • This skill is complete only when REVIEW_SUMMARY.json exists and is valid for downstream consumption.
Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/panjose/Co-Scientist --skill hypothesis-review-summary
Repository Details
star Stars 4
call_split Forks 0
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator