boris

star 1

Master orchestrator for Boris methodology - the verification-first workflow from Claude Code's creator. Use when: (1) Starting any development session, (2) User asks about verification or workflow best practices, (3) User wants to apply Boris methodology to a project, (4) User mentions "boris", "verify my work", "check my code", "methodology", or "workflow", (5) User needs guidance on Claude Code best practices.

Organized-AI By Organized-AI schedule Updated 1/30/2026

name: boris description: | Master orchestrator for Boris methodology - the verification-first workflow from Claude Code's creator. Use when: (1) Starting any development session, (2) User asks about verification or workflow best practices, (3) User wants to apply Boris methodology to a project, (4) User mentions "boris", "verify my work", "check my code", "methodology", or "workflow", (5) User needs guidance on Claude Code best practices. metadata: version: 1.0.0 author: Boris (Claude Code Creator) source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-UXpneKw6M integrates_with: - verify (command) - commit (command) - review (command) - status (command) - verify-architecture (agent) - verify-build (agent) - long-runner (skill) - phased-build (skill) - phase-0-bootstrap (skill) triggers:

  • "boris"
  • "verify my work"
  • "check my code"
  • "verification workflow"
  • "methodology"
  • "best practices"
  • "how should I work"
  • "start session"
  • "end session"
  • "before commit"
  • "before PR"

Boris Agent Skill

Master orchestrator implementing Boris methodology - the verification-first development workflow designed by Claude Code's creator.


⚡ Core Philosophy

"Always give Claude a way to verify its work."

This single principle drives everything. Every task, every feature, every commit should have a clear verification approach.


🎯 When to Activate

This skill activates when:

Trigger Response
Session start Run /status, orient to project state
Before coding Enter plan mode, define verification approach
During development One feature at a time, verify continuously
Before commit Run /verify, then /commit
Before PR Run /review, check architecture
When stuck Consult CLAUDE.md, check for anti-patterns
Error encountered Add to CLAUDE.md "DO NOT" section

🔧 Components I Orchestrate

Slash Commands (Daily Workflow)

Command Purpose When to Use
/status Project health check Session start
/verify Run all verification checks Before any commit
/commit Smart commit with verification After completing work
/review Self-review before PR Before creating PR

Verification Agents

Agent Purpose When to Invoke
verify-architecture Check file locations, naming, imports, circular deps After refactoring, before PR
verify-build Clean install + build + artifacts Before releases, after dep updates

Related Skills

Skill Purpose When to Use
long-runner Multi-session project orchestration Complex 50+ feature projects
phased-build Execute PHASE-X-PROMPT.md files Structured implementation plans
phase-0-bootstrap TypeScript/Node.js project setup Starting new projects

📋 Protocol 1: Session Start

When starting any development session:

SESSION START CHECKLIST
═══════════════════════════════════════════

1. ORIENTATION
   ├── pwd                     # Confirm directory
   ├── /status                 # Project health
   └── git log --oneline -5    # Recent history

2. CONTEXT GATHERING
   ├── Read CLAUDE.md          # Project rules
   ├── Check TODOs             # Pending work
   └── Review blockers         # From last session

3. PLAN THE WORK
   ├── Identify task           # What to work on
   ├── Enter plan mode         # ALWAYS plan first
   └── Define verification     # How to verify success

═══════════════════════════════════════════

Action: Run /status and review output before any coding.


📋 Protocol 2: Feature Development

For any feature or change:

FEATURE WORKFLOW
═══════════════════════════════════════════

1. PLAN (Always First!)
   └── "I will implement X by doing Y, and verify by Z"

2. IMPLEMENT
   ├── One feature at a time
   ├── No half-finished code
   └── No debug statements

3. VERIFY
   ├── Run tests
   ├── Run linter
   ├── Check types
   └── Manual verification if needed

4. COMMIT
   └── /commit (includes verification)

═══════════════════════════════════════════

Critical Rules:

  • NEVER skip plan mode for anything non-trivial
  • NEVER commit without verification passing
  • NEVER leave debug code (console.log, print statements)

📋 Protocol 3: Before Commit

Before any commit:

PRE-COMMIT CHECKLIST
═══════════════════════════════════════════

□ Code compiles/builds
□ All tests pass
□ Linter passes
□ No console.log/debug statements
□ No commented-out code
□ No TODO without issue link
□ No hardcoded secrets
□ Changes match intent

═══════════════════════════════════════════

Action: Run /verify first. If all pass, run /commit.


📋 Protocol 4: Before PR

Before creating a pull request:

PRE-PR CHECKLIST
═══════════════════════════════════════════

1. SELF-REVIEW
   └── Run /review

2. ARCHITECTURE CHECK
   └── Invoke verify-architecture agent

3. BUILD VALIDATION (if significant changes)
   └── Invoke verify-build agent

4. DOCUMENTATION
   ├── README updated if needed
   ├── CLAUDE.md updated if learned new anti-patterns
   └── Code comments where logic isn't obvious

═══════════════════════════════════════════

Action: Run /review, address any issues, then create PR.


📋 Protocol 5: Error Handling

When Claude makes a mistake:

ERROR RESPONSE PROTOCOL
═══════════════════════════════════════════

1. IDENTIFY
   └── What went wrong? What was the pattern?

2. DOCUMENT
   └── Add to CLAUDE.md "DO NOT" section:
       "- Never [do the thing that caused the error]"

3. COMMIT
   └── git commit -m "docs: Add anti-pattern to CLAUDE.md"

4. LEARN
   └── Team reviews and learns from the error

═══════════════════════════════════════════

Example additions to DO NOT:

## DO NOT
- Never use `any` type in TypeScript (causes runtime errors)
- Never import from `src/` in test files (module resolution)
- Never skip null checks on API responses (crashes)

📋 Protocol 6: Session End

Before ending any session:

SESSION END CHECKLIST
═══════════════════════════════════════════

1. CODE STATE
   ├── All tests passing?
   ├── No uncommitted changes?
   └── Code is merge-ready?

2. DOCUMENTATION
   ├── Progress logged? (if long-runner project)
   ├── Blockers documented?
   └── Next steps clear?

3. COMMIT
   └── Final /commit if needed

═══════════════════════════════════════════

🔒 Permission System

Team Settings (.claude/settings.json)

These are shared via git:

{
  "permissions": {
    "allow": ["Bash(git status:*)", "Bash(npm test:*)"],
    "ask": ["Bash(git commit:*)", "Bash(rm:*)"],
    "deny": ["Bash(git push --force:*)", "Bash(sudo:*)"]
  }
}

Local Overrides (.claude/settings.local.json)

Personal preferences, NOT committed:

{
  "permissions": {
    "allow": ["Bash(git commit:*)"]
  }
}

Rule: NEVER use --dangerously-skip-permissions. Configure proper permissions instead.


📊 Verification Methods by Domain

Domain Verification Method
Code Logic Unit tests, integration tests
Types TypeScript compiler (tsc --noEmit)
Style Linter (ESLint, Prettier)
UI/Frontend Screenshots, browser extension, E2E tests
API curl/httpie, Postman, integration tests
Build Clean install + build + smoke test
Architecture verify-architecture agent
Dependencies npm audit, npm outdated

🎯 Model Selection Strategy

Model Use For Why
Opus 4.5 + Thinking Complex features, architecture Fewer corrections needed
Sonnet Routine tasks, simple fixes Fast enough, good enough
Haiku Quick lookups, simple questions Minimal cost

"Overall time spent is lower with Opus because fewer corrections needed" - Boris


🔄 Integration with Other Skills

With long-runner

For complex multi-session projects:

1. Initialize with long-runner
2. Use Boris protocols for each session
3. Feature work follows Boris workflow
4. Session handoffs use long-runner templates

With phased-build

For structured implementation:

1. Each phase uses Boris verification
2. /verify before phase completion
3. /commit after each phase
4. Architecture check between phases

With phase-0-bootstrap

For new projects:

1. Bootstrap with phase-0
2. Immediately set up Boris infrastructure:
   - CLAUDE.md with proper sections
   - .claude/settings.json with permissions
   - Verification commands available

📝 CLAUDE.md Template

Keep under 2.5k tokens:

# [Project Name]

## Tech Stack
- Runtime: [Node.js 20, Python 3.11, etc.]
- Framework: [Express, React, FastAPI, etc.]
- Database: [PostgreSQL, MongoDB, etc.]
- Key Dependencies: [list major packages]

## Project Structure
[Brief 5-10 line folder map]

## Code Conventions
- [Naming convention]
- [Import order]
- [Error handling pattern]

## DO NOT
- [Anti-pattern 1 from past error]
- [Anti-pattern 2 from past error]
- [Anti-pattern 3 from past error]

## Verification Requirements
Before completing ANY task:
1. Describe verification approach
2. Run `npm test` (all must pass)
3. Run `npm run lint` (no errors)
4. For UI: take screenshot

⚡ Quick Reference

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    BORIS QUICK REFERENCE                     │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  SESSION START:  /status → Read CLAUDE.md → Plan           │
│                                                             │
│  FEATURE WORK:   Plan → Implement → /verify → /commit      │
│                                                             │
│  BEFORE PR:      /review → verify-architecture → Create PR │
│                                                             │
│  ON ERROR:       Document in CLAUDE.md "DO NOT" → Commit   │
│                                                             │
│  SESSION END:    Check state → Document → /commit          │
│                                                             │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  CORE RULE:  "Always give Claude a way to verify its work" │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

🎓 Learning More

  • Full Demo: DOCUMENTATION/BORIS-METHODOLOGY-DEMO.md
  • Cheat Sheet: DOCUMENTATION/BORIS-CHEAT-SHEET.md
  • Implementation Plan: PLANNING/boris-methodology-upgrade/
  • Original Source: Boris Interview

Remember: The methodology is "surprisingly vanilla" - the power comes from consistency and verification, not complexity.

Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/Organized-AI/clawdbotready --skill boris
Repository Details
star Stars 1
call_split Forks 0
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator
Organized-AI
Organized-AI Explore all skills →