name: mk:agent-detector description: Detects task agent, complexity tier, and model automatically at Phase 0 orient. Invoked first in every workflow. NOT for runtime agent routing inside a single skill (see orchestration-rules.md). model: haiku triggers: - every message - always first allowed-tools: - Read source: aura-frog keywords: - agent-routing - model-tier - phase-0-orient - auto-detect - complexity-classification when_to_use: Auto-invoked at Phase 0 by orchestrator to assign agent + model tier. Not user-callable directly. user-invocable: false owner: lifecycle criticality: medium status: active runtime: claude-code requires_external_service: ["jira"] default_enabled: true
Agent Detector
Priority: HIGHEST - Runs FIRST for every message. Automatically detects the correct agent, task complexity level, and model tier for each user message using a multi-layer scoring system. No manual agent selection needed -- the detector analyzes task content, explicit technology mentions, user intent, project context, and file patterns to route to the right agent with the right model.
When to Use
ALWAYS - Every user message, no exceptions. This skill fires before any other skill or agent action. It determines who handles the task, at what complexity level, and with which model.
Workflow
Safety baseline precheck (HARD GATE). Before any other step, scan the context window for the cached-sentinel marker emitted by
safety-sentinel-inject.cjs:## Safety baseline: verified (cached, session <id>)If the marker IS present (turns 2..N of the same session): emit
Safety baseline: verified (cached)and SKIP the 5-file Read loop below. The 5 rules remain in context from the inner harness's CLAUDE.md auto-load; the sentinel only suppresses redundant re-reads.If the marker is ABSENT (turn 1 of a new session, OR
MEOWKIT_SKIP_SAFETY_SENTINEL=off):Readeach of the 5 always-on safety/baseline rules:.claude/rules/security-rules.md.claude/rules/injection-rules.md.claude/rules/gate-rules.md.claude/rules/core-behaviors.md.claude/rules/development-rules.md
If any
Readreturns "file does not exist" or equivalent, ABORT IMMEDIATELY with the exact message:SAFETY BASELINE INCOMPLETE: rule <name> not found at .claude/rules/<name>.md Refusing to route any task. Restore the rule (git checkout / the installer) before retrying.Do NOT proceed to detection. Do NOT route to any agent. The 5 rules are the deterministic baseline; their absence indicates either repo corruption or a partial install. Replaces the unverified directory-auto-load assumption with a positive existence check.
0b. Phase-zero rule load. After the safety baseline is confirmed, scan context for the cached-sentinel marker:
## Phase-zero rules: verified (cached, session <id>)
If the marker IS present: emit Phase-zero rules: verified (cached) and SKIP the 6-file Read loop. If ABSENT (turn 1 or env-var override), Read each phase-zero file. These govern Phase 0 routing and are read once per agent-detector invocation:
.claude/rules/phase-contracts.md— what each phase expects/produces.claude/rules/agent-routing.md— agent → role → phase table.claude/rules/model-selection-rules.md— task-type → model-tier mapping.claude/rules/scale-adaptive-rules.md— domain CSV → complexity routing.claude/rules/risk-checklist.md— 9 horizontal-risk flags.claude/skills/agent-detector/references/skill-domain-routing.md— intent → skill dispatch table (used at hand-off, Step 5)
If any of the 5 rule Reads fails: ABORT with PHASE-ZERO RULE MISSING: <name> — same fail-fast semantics as Step 0. These rules drive the routing logic in steps 2–4; without them, detection silently degrades to keyword-only. The skill-domain-routing reference is advisory dispatch guidance (not a routing rule): if it is absent, log skill-domain-routing reference absent; skill dispatch falls back to inline judgment and continue — do NOT abort.
Agile context detection (additive — Agile-only load). After the 5 phase-zero Reads succeed:
- PRE-FLIGHT. Check that
.claude/rules-conditional/directory exists. If absent → logagile rules: rules-conditional/ not deployed; skipping loadand skip steps 2–4. (Defensive: filesystem may lag pruning-plan status doc.) - Detect Agile context — OR-logic, any one match triggers load:
- Glob
tasks/contracts/sprint-state-*-sprint-*.mdreturns ≥1 result - Active plan frontmatter has non-empty
jira_tickets: MEOW_JIRA_BASE_URLenv var is set- Last user message matches
[A-Z]{2,10}-\d+(Jira-key pattern)
- Glob
- If Agile context detected,
Readthe 3 conditional rules:.claude/rules-conditional/agile-story-gates.md.claude/rules-conditional/agile-sprint-commitment.md.claude/rules-conditional/agile-feedback-cycle.mdPer-file Read failure (file absent inside the directory): log and skip THAT rule; do NOT abort Step 0b. The phase-zero baseline is already loaded.
- Sprint-goal banner. If a sprint-state contract exists, parse
sprint_goal:from the newest active sprint-state file (status: active) and surface in the orient banner.
Non-Agile sessions skip steps 1–4 silently — zero context cost.
- Check cache -- reuse cached result if same workflow and phase > 1. See
references/detection-process.md - Score agents -- analyze task content, extract keywords, check project context across all layers (0-4). See
references/multi-layer-detection.md,references/scoring-and-thresholds.md - Select model + mode -- map complexity to model tier, check team mode eligibility. See
references/model-selection.md,references/complexity-detection.md,references/team-mode.md - Evaluate risk flags -- read
.claude/rules/risk-checklist.md(loaded in Step 0b). For each of the 9 flags (AUTH, AUTHZ, DATA_MODEL, AUDIT_SEC, EXT_SYSTEM, PUBLIC_CONTRACT, CROSS_PLATFORM, EXISTING_BEHAVIOR, WEAK_PROOF), evaluate whether the task description matches its trigger criteria. Emitmatched_flags: [<ID>, ...](default[]). If any flag in{AUTH, AUTHZ, DATA_MODEL, AUDIT_SEC, EXT_SYSTEM}matches, escalate the tier to COMPLEX perrules/model-selection-rules.mdRule 2 — regardless ofmk:scale-routingoutcome. - Output + hand off -- show detection banner (including
matched_flagsline if non-empty), load agent instructions, invoke skill. Seereferences/detection-process.md,references/after-detection.md
References
references/lifecycle-routing.md-- Task signal → phase → skill mapping (advisory, does not change scoring)references/complexity-detection.md-- Complexity levels, auto-detection criteria, detection logicreferences/model-selection.md-- Model mapping tables (complexity, task type, agent defaults)references/multi-layer-detection.md-- Layers 0-4: task content, tech, intent, project context, file patternsreferences/scoring-and-thresholds.md-- Scoring weights, agent thresholds, QA activation rulesreferences/detection-process.md-- Step-by-step process (cache, Steps 0-5, banner format)references/examples.md-- Seven worked examples covering common detection scenariosreferences/team-mode.md-- Team mode gate, composition rules, output format, handoffreferences/after-detection.md-- Post-detection actions, available agents, manual override
Token Budget
After complexity detection, check user depth signals per references/token-budget-levels.md to set response verbosity. Silent by default — do not surface to users.
Gotchas
- Misrouting trivial tasks to heavyweight agents: Short messages that contain domain keywords (e.g., "fix the auth token") score high for complex agents even when the actual work is a one-line change. The detector favors keyword matches over scope signals. → If the banner shows an unexpected agent/model tier, override via
--quickor use the explicit/mk:fix --quickshorthand to force the right complexity level. - Cache stale after context switch: The detection cache reuses the result from the previous workflow phase, but when a conversation pivots mid-session (e.g., "actually, let's do X instead"), the cached detection is wrong for the new task. The detector doesn't invalidate on pivot signals. → Confirm the banner after any explicit task change; if the agent/model is wrong, start a new message explicitly describing the new task so Layer 0 re-detects from scratch.
- Multi-domain tasks picking the wrong primary agent: Tasks spanning two domains (e.g., "add a security check to the payment UI") split scores across agents and the highest scorer wins, which may be wrong for the dominant concern. The tiebreaker is the first keyword match, not importance. → For cross-domain tasks, state the primary concern explicitly at the start of the message (e.g., "Security task: ...") so Layer 0 domain detection anchors to the right agent before keyword scoring runs.