manuscript-writing

star 30

Use this skill for "write a paper", "draft manuscript", "write introduction", "write methods section", "write results", "write discussion", "write abstract", "structure a paper", "academic writing", "write for journal", or when the user wants to draft or revise sections of an academic manuscript.

neuromechanist By neuromechanist schedule Updated 5/11/2026

name: manuscript-writing description: "Use this skill for "write a paper", "draft manuscript", "write introduction", "write methods section", "write results", "write discussion", "write abstract", "structure a paper", "academic writing", "write for journal", or when the user wants to draft or revise sections of an academic manuscript." version: 0.2.1

Academic Manuscript Writing

Guide the drafting and revision of academic manuscripts following journal conventions and scientific writing best practices.

When to Use

  • Drafting a new manuscript from scratch
  • Writing or revising specific sections (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion)
  • Structuring a paper from experimental results
  • Converting a conference paper to a journal submission
  • Responding to reviewer comments with revised text

Manuscript Structure

Standard IMRAD Format

Section Purpose Tense Length Guide
Title Convey main finding N/A 10-15 words
Abstract Self-contained summary Past (methods/results), Present (conclusions) 150-300 words
Introduction Context, gap, hypothesis Present (known facts), Past (prior work) 3-5 paragraphs
Methods Reproducibility Past As needed
Results Report findings Past Parallel to Methods
Discussion Interpret findings Present (interpretation), Past (what was found) 4-6 paragraphs
Conclusion Key takeaways Present 1-2 paragraphs

Section-by-Section Guidance

Introduction

Structure as a funnel:

  1. Broad context - Establish the field and importance (1-2 paragraphs)
  2. Narrow focus - What is known about the specific topic (1-2 paragraphs)
  3. Gap statement - What remains unknown or problematic
  4. Objective/hypothesis - What this paper addresses and how

Methods

  • Enough detail for replication
  • Subsections mirror Results sections
  • Include: participants/subjects, materials, procedures, analysis
  • Statistical methods: specify tests, software, significance thresholds
  • Ethics: IRB/IACUC approval statement

Results

  • Present findings without interpretation
  • Start each subsection with the analysis performed, then the outcome
  • Report effect sizes, confidence intervals (not just p-values)
  • Reference figures and tables in order
  • Use "significant" only for statistical significance

Discussion

Structure:

  1. Summary of key findings (1 paragraph)
  2. Interpretation in context of prior literature (2-3 paragraphs)
  3. Limitations (1 paragraph, honest but not self-defeating)
  4. Future directions (1 paragraph)
  5. Conclusion (1 paragraph)

Writing Principles

Clarity

  • One idea per sentence
  • Active voice preferred ("We measured..." not "Measurements were taken...")
  • Define abbreviations on first use
  • Avoid jargon unless writing for a specialist audience

Precision

  • Quantify claims ("increased by 23%" not "significantly increased")
  • Cite sources for factual claims
  • Distinguish correlation from causation
  • Use hedging appropriately ("suggests" vs "proves")

Flow

  • Each paragraph: topic sentence, evidence, interpretation
  • Transitions between paragraphs connect ideas
  • Logical progression within and across sections
  • Consistent terminology (don't alternate between synonyms for key concepts)

Citations

  • Cite primary sources, not reviews (when possible)
  • Recent citations show awareness of current literature
  • Cite competing or contradictory findings
  • Self-citation should be relevant, not gratuitous

Revision Checklist

After drafting, check:

  • Abstract accurately reflects the paper content
  • Introduction gap statement matches the study objective
  • Methods are sufficient for replication
  • Results match Methods (parallel structure)
  • Discussion addresses all major findings
  • Figures are referenced in text in order
  • All abbreviations defined on first use
  • References complete and consistently formatted
  • Word/page count within journal limits
  • Run manuscript:humanizer as a final natural-writing pass (strips AI tells like significance inflation, em-dashes, "evolving landscape" filler, rule-of-three padding) before review

Additional Resources

  • Reference: references/section-templates.md - Templates for each manuscript section
  • Reference: references/revision-response.md - How to write point-by-point responses to reviewers
  • Sister skill: manuscript:humanizer - Removes 29 categories of AI-writing tells while respecting academic conventions (e.g., passive voice in Methods, hedging in Discussion). Run after drafting and before peer review.
Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/neuromechanist/research-skills --skill manuscript-writing
Repository Details
star Stars 30
call_split Forks 7
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator
neuromechanist
neuromechanist Explore all skills →