feynman-decision

name: feynman-decision description: "Analyze technical options with structured comparison matrices, scoring, and ADR draft generation. Use when the user needs help choosing between technologies, architectures, or implementation approaches." context: fork agent: general-purpose allowed-tools: WebFetch, WebSearch, Read, Bash argument-hint: ""

Technical Decision Analysis

Analyze the technical decision: $ARGUMENTS

Workflow

Step 1: Understand Decision Context

• What's being decided
• What options exist
• Why it matters
• What's at stake

Step 2: Define Evaluation Criteria

Infer criteria based on decision type:

Technology Selection: Maturity, performance, developer experience, documentation, future-proofing, migration path

Architecture Decision: Complexity, maintainability, scalability, user experience, cost

Implementation Approach: Time to implement, code quality, testability, flexibility

Step 3: Research Each Option

For each option gather facts from official documentation, benchmarks, real-world usage, known issues. Analyze pros, cons, tradeoffs, and risks.

Step 4: Score Options

Create comparison matrix:

Step 5: Generate Recommendation

• Selected Option: Which one to choose
• Rationale: Why (based on criteria + context)
• Tradeoffs: What we're accepting
• Risks: What to watch out for
• Validation: How to verify it was right

Step 6: Create ADR Draft

# ADR-{N}: {Decision Title}

**Status**: Proposed
**Date**: {DATE}
**Context**: {WHY_NEEDED}
**Decision**: We will {SELECTED_OPTION}
**Rationale**: {WHY_THIS_CHOICE}
**Consequences**: Positive, Negative, Neutral
**Alternatives Considered**: {REJECTED_OPTIONS}

Decision Quality Principles

1. Evidence-based: Backed by research and data
2. Context-aware: Consider project constraints
3. Explicit about tradeoffs: No option is perfect
4. Reversible-aware: Note if/how decision can change
5. Validated: Include how to verify correctness