curate-next

name: curate-next description: Use when asked to curate the next N disease curation issues already assigned to the current GitHub user. Filters open issues to those where the user is the sole assignee and no PR exists yet, picks the first N, then dispatches /curate in parallel for each. Accepts a positional integer N between 1 and 8.

curate-next

Curate the next N disease curation issues that are assigned solely to the current GitHub user and not yet covered by a PR. Dispatches /curate in parallel — one agent per disease.

When to use

• "Curate my next 3 diseases"
• "/curate-next 5"
• "Take the next available curation assignments off my plate"

Skip when:

• The user names a specific disease — invoke /curate <name> directly instead.
• The user has no open curation assignments — invoke /claim-disease N first to file issues.
• The user wants to claim and curate in one step — that's a /claim-disease then /curate-next chain, not this skill alone.

Inputs

• Required positional argument N: number of diseases to curate in parallel. Must be a positive integer between 1 and 8 inclusive.
• Invoked as /curate-next 3. If N is missing, non-integer, <= 0, or > 8, stop and ask the user to clarify rather than guess. The cap exists because each /curate flow is long-running and parallel sub-agents past 8 saturate the orchestrator's context.

Workflow

1. Validate N. Parse the positional argument. Reject if missing, non-integer, <= 0, or > 8 — ask the user rather than silently capping. Never default to a value the user did not provide.

2. Resolve the current GitHub user: USER=$(gh api user -q .login). Use that login as the assignee filter and never hardcode a username.

3. Fetch open curation issues assigned to the user.

   gh issue list \
     --assignee @me \
     --state open \
     --label curation \
     --json number,title,assignees,body,createdAt \
     --limit 100
   

   The --label curation filter is what restricts to "new disease curation requests" — issues filed by /claim-disease carry the curation,enhancement labels and the title pattern Curate <label> (<MONDO_ID>). If a contributor opens curation issues with a different label, document it in this skill rather than relaxing the filter.

4. Filter to sole-assignee issues. Drop any issue whose assignees array has more than one entry. The user explicitly wants solo work — an issue assigned to both alice and bob is a team task, even if the current user is alice. Do this filter in jq, not by hand:

   jq '[.[] | select((.assignees | length) == 1)]'
   

5. Filter out issues with an existing PR. For each remaining issue number ISSUE_NUM, check the authoritative GitHub linkage on the issue itself:

   # Authoritative: PRs GitHub has linked via closes/fixes/resolves keywords
   # (this is the same data the issue's "Development" sidebar shows)
   gh issue view "${ISSUE_NUM}" --json closedByPullRequestsReferences \
     -q '.closedByPullRequestsReferences | length'
   

   Skip the issue if the count is non-zero. A merged PR usually means the issue should already be closed, but stale links happen — be conservative.

   Do NOT use gh pr list --search "closes #${ISSUE_NUM}" as a forward check. GitHub's free-text search matches the literal string #${ISSUE_NUM} anywhere in PR body or commits, including unrelated occurrences like ORPHA:${ISSUE_NUM}. This produced a false positive in production on issue #2704 (Orphanet ID ORPHA:2704 in PR #1992's body matched #2704). closedByPullRequestsReferences is structured GitHub linkage and avoids the trap.

   If closedByPullRequestsReferences is rejected as an unknown field by the local gh version, upgrade gh rather than falling back to the lossy text search.

6. Sort and pick. Sort the survivors by number ascending (oldest issue first — that's the conventional FIFO for a curation queue) and take the first N. If fewer than N survive, do not pad — report the shortfall in the final report.

7. Extract the disease label and MONDO ID from each title. Issue titles follow Curate <label> (<MONDO_ID>). Parse with a regex; if a title does not match (e.g. an old hand-filed issue), skip it and note it in the final report rather than passing a garbled label to /curate.

8. Run duplicate preflight for each picked issue. Before dispatch, verify the disease is still absent from the latest upstream KB and is not already covered by another PR or issue:

   git fetch origin main
   git grep -n -i -e "<MONDO_ID>" -e "<label>" origin/main -- kb/disorders || true
   gh pr list --repo monarch-initiative/dismech --state all \
     --search "\"<MONDO_ID>\" OR \"<label>\"" \
     --json number,title,state,url,headRefName --limit 100
   gh issue list --repo monarch-initiative/dismech --state all \
     --search "\"<MONDO_ID>\" OR \"<label>\"" \
     --json number,title,state,url,labels --limit 100
   

   The current issue itself is expected in the issue search results. Skip the candidate if the KB, another PR, or another issue already covers the same disorder, and report the skip.

9. Dispatch /curate in parallel. In a single message, launch N Agent tool calls — one per disease — using subagent_type: general-purpose so each agent has full tool access (Tools: *). claude works too on harnesses that register it as a catch-all type, but general-purpose is the canonical name across harnesses; prefer it for portability. Each agent's prompt MUST:

   • State the disease label and MONDO ID verbatim.

   • State that the duplicate preflight against latest KB, all PRs, and all issues has already been performed, and tell the agent to repeat it before writing files if its worktree is created later from stale refs.

   • Quote any deep-research provider hints from the issue body (e.g. "using falcon", "using deep-research"). Default to falcon when none are mentioned.

   • Reference the GitHub issue number so the agent links the resulting PR back to it.

   • Instruct the agent to consult the initiate-new-disorder-creation skill for the full curation workflow (this is what /curate does — sub-agents cannot invoke slash commands directly, so this skill must be named in the prompt).

   • For CURATE_ROOT_WITH_SUBTYPES issues, note that subtypes should be modelled with has_subtypes.

   • MUST tell the agent to create a git worktree of its own and cd into it, then root every Read/Edit/Write/Bash file operation in the worktree's path — never in the parent checkout's path. Never give the agent the parent checkout's absolute path as its working directory. In a real production incident, two of three agents took an absolute parent path from the prompt (/Users/.../dismech-1) and wrote kb/disorders/<disease>.yaml plus dozens of references_cache/*.md files into the parent checkout instead of their own worktree — branches were left empty and recovery required surgery. The agent prompt should include something like:

     Create your own git worktree (use the `superpowers:using-git-worktrees` skill) on a fresh branch off `origin/main`, then `cd` into that worktree. After `cd`, run `pwd` and confirm the printed path is the worktree's path and is NOT the parent checkout's path BEFORE any file write. For Read/Edit/Write tool calls (which require absolute paths), use absolute paths rooted in the worktree — never an absolute path that contains the parent checkout's location. For Bash calls, prefer relative paths after `cd`-ing into the worktree. Commit and push from inside the worktree.
     

   Dispatching all N in one message is the whole point — sequential dispatch defeats the skill. See superpowers:dispatching-parallel-agents if you need a refresher on parallel sub-agent semantics. Run the agents in the background (run_in_background: true) so the orchestrator regains control immediately and can report; you will be notified as each finishes.

   After every agent finishes (or stalls), verify each branch has at least one commit: git log origin/main..<branch> --oneline. If empty, the agent's work is likely uncommitted in its worktree's working tree — or worse, leaked into the parent checkout. Check git status in the parent before dispatching another batch.

10. Report. After all agents finish, list:

• Issues processed (number + label + agent result summary)
• Issues skipped and why (duplicate KB/PR/issue / already has PR / co-assigned / unparseable title)
• The shortfall, if you delivered fewer than N curations

Quick reference

Common mistakes

• Treating co-assigned issues as solo work. gh issue list --assignee @me returns issues where the user is an assignee, not the only assignee. The jq length-1 filter in step 4 is mandatory.
• Skipping the PR-existence check. If a contributor opened a PR three days ago and is still under review, re-running /curate will overwrite their work and waste the reviewer's time. Always check closedByPullRequestsReferences on the issue before dispatching.
• Skipping the duplicate preflight. The current issue may have been filed before another agent opened a PR or before a newer disorder entry reached origin/main. Re-check latest KB, all PRs, and all issues immediately before dispatch.
• Using gh pr list --search "closes #N" as a PR-link check. GitHub's free-text search matches the literal #N anywhere — including ORPHA:N, MONDO:0000N, line numbers in code blocks, etc. This caused a real false positive on issue #2704 (matched on ORPHA:2704). The structured closedByPullRequestsReferences field on the issue is the authoritative signal.
• Running /curate sequentially. Sequential dispatch defeats the skill. All N Agent calls go in one message.
• Silently picking fewer than N. If only 2 issues survive when the user asked for 5, say so explicitly in the report. Do not pad the count with co-assigned or PR-linked issues just to hit N.
• Hardcoding the GitHub username. Always resolve via gh api user -q .login so the skill works for any contributor.
• Defaulting N when the user didn't supply it. This skill requires an explicit N — unlike /claim-disease, there is no sensible default for "how many of your in-flight assignments to attack at once." Ask.
• Looking up MONDO IDs from dashboard/priority.json. That is /claim-disease's job. This skill is strictly issue-driven — every disease curated comes from an existing GitHub issue title.
• Trying to call /curate from inside a sub-agent. Slash commands are not available in sub-agent context. Inline the /curate instructions (consult initiate-new-disorder-creation, use falcon by default) into the agent prompt.
• Giving the agent the parent checkout's absolute path as its working directory. If the dispatch prompt says Working directory: /Users/.../dismech-1, the agent will happily use that path in its Write tool calls and your new disorder YAML lands in the parent checkout instead of the agent's worktree. The branch will be empty (no commits) and the work is hard to attribute when multiple agents leak in parallel. Always instruct the agent to create its own worktree, cd into it, and root every file operation in the worktree's path (absolute for Read/Edit/Write, relative is fine for Bash post-cd).
• Skipping the post-dispatch branch-commit audit. Even with a worktree instruction, an agent that stalls mid-write leaves uncommitted work in its worktree. If you don't check git log origin/main..<branch> for each agent before deleting/pruning, you can lose draft YAMLs and fetched reference caches.

Relationship to other skills

• /claim-disease N — files new curation issues for the top-N priority uncurated diseases. Use first if you have no open assignments.
• /curate <name> — curates a single disease end-to-end. This skill dispatches it in parallel.
• /curate-next N — this skill. Reads your assigned-but-unstarted curation issues and runs the /curate workflow on the first N.

A typical batch session is /claim-disease 5 (file 5 issues) → /curate-next 5 (curate them in parallel).