octo-commit

name: octo-commit description: "Structured workflow for committing finished work across OctoMesh repositories: scans repos for changes, resolves or creates the Azure DevOps work item, builds the AB# commit message, verifies the build/tests, and optionally opens a PR. Enforces the review checkpoint — never pushes or opens a PR without explicit user approval in the current session. Trigger on: commit, push, PR, pull request, merge, finish work, done, ship it, wrap up, AB#, work item, ready to commit, close task, create branch, feature branch, dev/, Azure DevOps." allowed-tools: - "Bash(git status:)" - "Bash(git diff:)" - "Bash(git log:)" - "Bash(git add:)" - "Bash(git commit:)" - "Bash(git checkout:)" - "Bash(git push:)" - "Bash(git pull:)" - "Bash(git config:)" - "Bash(git remote:)" - "Bash(gh pr create:)" - "Bash(az boards:)" - "Bash(az repos pr create:)" - "Bash(az devops:)" - "Bash(dotnet build:)" - "Bash(dotnet test:)" - "Bash(npm run lint:)" - "Bash(npm test:)" - "Bash(for:*)" - "Read" - "Grep" - "Glob" - "AskUserQuestion"

octo-commit

Structured workflow for committing finished work across OctoMesh repositories with Azure DevOps work item linking, verification, and optional PR creation.

CRITICAL: Review Checkpoint Before Pushing

Never push or create a PR without explicit user approval given in the CURRENT session. This is a firm convention from the repo owner.

• Implementation latitude (permission to write code) does NOT imply push authority.
• Statements like "I'll look at it later", "Ich schau's mir später an", "let me review first" mean STOP — do not push, do not open a PR. The user is taking a review checkpoint before the push.
• Committing locally may be fine when asked; pushing and PR creation always require a fresh, explicit go-ahead ("push it", "create the PR", "ship it").
• When in doubt, ask via AskUserQuestion before any git push / gh pr create / az repos pr create.

Commit Message Format

AB#<WorkItemId> <New|Fix>: <Description>

New and Fix cover the overwhelming majority of OctoMesh commits. Task has no distinct prefix convention in the git history — default to New and confirm the prefix with the user if the change is clearly a correction (then Fix).

Description: imperative mood, concise (e.g., "Add validation" not "Added validation").

Branch Naming

Derive <username> from git config user.name (first name, lowercase). Derive <feature-name> from the work item title or change context (kebab-case).

Workflow

digraph commit_flow {
    rankdir=TB;
    node [shape=box];

    scan [label="1. Scan repos for changes"];
    context [label="2. Understand change context"];
    claudemd [label="3. Read CLAUDE.md per repo"];
    workitem [label="4. Find or create work item"];
    strategy [label="5. Choose commit strategy"];
    verify [label="6. Verify completion"];
    approve [label="7. REVIEW CHECKPOINT: get explicit approval"];
    execute [label="8. Commit and push"];
    pr [label="9. Create PR"];

    scan -> context -> claudemd -> workitem -> strategy -> verify -> approve -> execute;
    execute -> pr [label="if feature branch"];
}

Step 1: Scan All Repos for Pending Changes

Find the monorepo root (directory containing octo-tools/) by walking up from the current working directory. Then scan every git repo for uncommitted changes:

# From the monorepo root
for dir in */; do
  if [ -d "$dir/.git" ]; then
    changes=$(git -C "$dir" status --porcelain 2>/dev/null)
    if [ -n "$changes" ]; then
      echo "=== $dir ==="
      echo "$changes"
    fi
  fi
done

Report ALL repos with changes. Do not skip any. Also check for unpushed commits:

git -C "$dir" log --oneline @{upstream}..HEAD 2>/dev/null

Step 2: Understand Change Context

Gather context from (priority order):

1. User's prompt -- explicit description of the work
2. Conversation history -- what was discussed/implemented this session
3. Git diffs -- git diff and git diff --staged in each changed repo

If context is unclear, use AskUserQuestion:

"I found changes in [repos]. Can you briefly describe what you worked on?"

Step 3: Read CLAUDE.md for Each Changed Repo

For every repo with pending changes:

1. Read <repo>/CLAUDE.md if it exists
2. Note build commands, test commands, and conventions
3. Note the required build configuration (typically DebugL for OctoMesh .NET repos)

IMPORTANT: Follow repo-specific conventions from CLAUDE.md. They override defaults.

Step 4: Find or Create Azure DevOps Work Item

Azure DevOps context: Organization meshmakers, Project OctoMesh.

Resolution order:

1. Check if user mentioned a work item ID (AB#1234, "work item 1234")
2. Check current branch name for clues (dev/reimar/AB1234-feature)
3. If unknown, analyze the changes and search Azure DevOps with a WIQL query:

az boards query \
  --wiql "SELECT [System.Id], [System.Title], [System.WorkItemType], [System.State] \
          FROM WorkItems \
          WHERE [System.TeamProject] = 'OctoMesh' \
          AND [System.Title] CONTAINS '<keyword>' \
          AND [System.State] <> 'Closed' \
          ORDER BY [System.ChangedDate] DESC" \
  --org https://dev.azure.com/meshmakers

CRITICAL: The WIQL command is az boards query — there is no az boards work-item query subcommand (az boards work-item only has create/delete/show/update).

Work item types: Bug, Issue (features), Epic, Task.

Present matching work items to the user with AskUserQuestion if multiple matches found.

If no matching work item exists, ask user whether to create one. If yes, gather the following via AskUserQuestion:

1. Type: Bug, Issue, Epic, or Task
2. Team: one of the real OctoMesh teams (see below)
3. Area: suggest based on which repos have changes
4. Iteration: list available iterations for the chosen team

OctoMesh Azure DevOps teams (use the exact names): Solutions Team (plural), Product Team, CustomerProjects Team, Sales Team, BizOps Team, Energy Solution Team.

# List available iterations for a team
az boards iteration team list \
  --team "Solutions Team" \
  --org https://dev.azure.com/meshmakers \
  --project OctoMesh

# List available areas for a team
az boards area team list \
  --team "Solutions Team" \
  --org https://dev.azure.com/meshmakers \
  --project OctoMesh

Create the work item (Mutating — confirm with user first):

az boards work-item create \
  --type "<Type>" \
  --title "<Title>" \
  --area "<AreaPath>" \
  --iteration "<IterationPath>" \
  --org https://dev.azure.com/meshmakers \
  --project OctoMesh

Step 5: Choose Commit Strategy

Use AskUserQuestion if not already clear from context: Direct to main (small, low-risk) or Feature branch + PR (standard).

For a feature branch, create it using the Branch Naming convention above:

git -C <repo> checkout -b dev/<username>/<feature-name>

Step 6: Verify Completion

Before committing, verify the work is ready. For each changed repo, check based on its CLAUDE.md:

For .NET repos:

dotnet build <solution>.sln --configuration DebugL
dotnet test <solution>.sln --configuration DebugL

For Angular/frontend repos:

npm run lint
npm test -- --watch=false

If build or tests fail, use AskUserQuestion:

"Build/tests failed in [repo]: [error summary]. Fix first, or proceed anyway?"

For significant changes, ask about documentation:

"Does this change need documentation updates?"

Step 7: Review Checkpoint — Get Explicit Approval

Before any git push / gh pr create / az repos pr create, you must have explicit approval in the current session. Show the user what will happen via AskUserQuestion:

Ready to commit and push:

• Repo: [repo-name]
• Message: AB#1234 New: Add pipeline validation
• Files: [file list or summary]
• Branch: main / dev/reimar/feature-name
• Will push + open PR: yes/no

If the user defers ("I'll look at it later"), STOP — you may commit locally only if explicitly asked, but do not push or open a PR.

Step 8: Commit and Push

Build the commit message using the format AB#<id> <New|Fix>: <Description>.

Co-Authored-By convention: OctoMesh repos use a model-specific trailer of the form Co-Authored-By: Claude <model name> <noreply@anthropic.com> — not a bare Claude. Use the running model's name, e.g. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>.

For each repo with changes:

# Stage changes (prefer specific files over -A when possible)
git -C <repo> add <specific-files>

# Commit with heredoc for proper formatting
git -C <repo> commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
AB#<id> <New|Fix>: <Description>

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
EOF
)"

# First push of a new branch MUST set upstream with -u
git -C <repo> push -u origin <branch>

# Subsequent pushes (upstream already set)
git -C <repo> push

CRITICAL: The initial push of a freshly created feature branch requires -u (git push -u origin <branch>) to set the upstream tracking ref; later pushes can use a bare git push.

NEVER force-push to main. Always confirm before pushing (see Review Checkpoint).

Step 9: Create PR (if feature branch)

For GitHub repos (majority of OctoMesh repos):

gh pr create \
  --repo meshmakers/<repo-name> \
  --title "AB#<id> <New|Fix>: <Description>" \
  --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
- <bullet points of changes>

## Azure DevOps Work Item
AB#<id>

## Test Plan
- [ ] Build passes (DebugL)
- [ ] Unit + integration tests pass
- [ ] Manual verification done

Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
EOF
)"

For Azure DevOps repos (e.g., meshmakers_staging). Use --work-items to link the PR directly to the ADO work item (space-separated IDs):

az repos pr create \
  --repository <repo-name> \
  --source-branch <branch> \
  --target-branch main \
  --title "AB#<id> <New|Fix>: <Description>" \
  --work-items <id> \
  --org https://dev.azure.com/meshmakers \
  --project OctoMesh

Report the PR URL(s) to the user when done.

Multi-Repo Commits

When changes span multiple repos:

1. Use the same work item ID and same commit message prefix across all repos
2. Commit repos in dependency order (consult CLAUDE.md for build order)
3. Push all repos before creating PRs
4. Cross-reference PRs in their descriptions when related

Repo Remotes Quick Reference

Most octo-* repos live at meshmakers/<repo> on GitHub (gh pr create). meshmakers_staging is the sole Azure DevOps-hosted repo (az repos pr create). pipeline-editor, docs, zenon-dynprop-api, and aspire-management-prototype are under reikla/ on GitHub.

CRITICAL: The local directory docs maps to the GitHub repo reikla/ai-docs (NOT reikla/docs). If unsure of a repo's remote, verify before pushing: git -C <repo> remote get-url origin.

See ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/octo-commit/references/repo-remotes.md for the full directory-to-remote table.

Common Mistakes

Red Flags -- STOP and Verify

• About to push or open a PR without explicit approval in the current session — STOP. "I'll look at it later" means do not push.
• About to commit without an AB# work item link
• Pushing directly to main on a non-trivial change
• Tests not run or failing
• Changes in repos you haven't read CLAUDE.md for
• Sensitive files in the staging area (.env, appsettings with secrets)
• Pushing a new branch without -u (upstream not set)