accessibility-audit

star 289

WCAG 2.1 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.

me2resh By me2resh schedule Updated 5/24/2026

name: accessibility-audit description: WCAG 2.1 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility. disable-model-invocation: false argument-hint: "[project-path]" effort: high

/accessibility-audit — WCAG 2.1 AA Compliance

Deep-dive accessibility analysis against the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 Level AA. Produces a prioritized findings list with fix instructions. Invoke when /launch-check's accessibility row shows WARN or FAIL, or proactively for any user-facing app.

WCAG Principles (POUR)

Principle What it means Key checks
Perceivable Content must be presentable in ways users can perceive Alt text, captions, color contrast, text resizing
Operable Interface must be navigable and usable Keyboard access, focus management, skip links, timing
Understandable Content and UI must be understandable Language declaration, consistent navigation, error identification
Robust Content must work across assistive technologies Valid HTML, ARIA usage, semantic elements

Process

Step 1: Scan for structural issues

Grep the codebase for common accessibility failures:

  • <img without alt attribute
  • <input without associated <label> or aria-label
  • onClick without onKeyDown / onKeyPress (keyboard inaccessible)
  • <div> or <span> used as buttons without role="button" and tabIndex
  • Missing <html lang="..."> attribute
  • Heading hierarchy gaps (h1 → h3 with no h2)
  • Missing <main>, <nav>, <header>, <footer> landmarks
  • Color values with insufficient contrast ratios (check theme files / CSS variables)
  • Missing skip-to-content link
  • Auto-playing media without controls
  • Forms without error identification (aria-invalid, aria-describedby)

Step 2: Check ARIA usage

  • aria-label on interactive elements without visible text
  • aria-hidden="true" not applied to decorative elements
  • role attributes used correctly (not role="button" on a <div> that should be a <button>)
  • Live regions (aria-live) for dynamic content updates
  • aria-expanded / aria-controls on expandable sections

Step 3: Output findings

ACCESSIBILITY AUDIT — <project> @ <sha>

| # | WCAG | Criterion | Severity | Finding | Fix |
|----|------|-----------|----------|---------|-----|
| A1 | 1.1.1 | Non-text content | HIGH | 12 images missing alt text | Add descriptive alt attributes |
| A2 | 2.1.1 | Keyboard | HIGH | 3 onClick handlers without keyboard equivalent | Add onKeyDown with Enter/Space handling |
| A3 | 1.4.3 | Contrast | MEDIUM | Button text #999 on #fff = 2.8:1 (needs 4.5:1) | Darken to #767676 or darker |
| A4 | 2.4.1 | Skip nav | LOW | No skip-to-content link | Add <a href="#main" class="skip-link"> |

Summary: <N> findings (<N> high, <N> medium, <N> low)
WCAG 2.1 AA estimate: <PASS / PARTIAL / FAIL>

Persist the run + render trend

After printing the findings table, persist via the shared audit-history lib so the accessibility trend across runs becomes legible. See docs/agdr/AgDR-0019-audit-artefact-persistence.md.

Resolve project name + score + verdict

<project-name> from apexyard.projects.yaml (or basename + /handover reminder if unregistered).

Score: score = max(0, 100 - 25*critical - 10*high - 3*medium - 1*low). Verdict by worst-severity: critical/high → fail, medium → conditional, low/none → pass. Legacy "WCAG 2.1 AA estimate" three-state: FAIL → fail, PARTIAL → conditional, PASS → pass.

Persist + render

source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-audit-history.sh"

# Lowercase severity in the payload — the lib expects critical/high/medium/low/info.
payload=$(mktemp); cat > "$payload" <<'EOF'
{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "findings": [
    {"id": "A1", "severity": "high",   "status": "open", "summary": "Images missing alt text (WCAG 1.1.1)"},
    {"id": "A2", "severity": "high",   "status": "open", "summary": "onClick handlers without keyboard equivalent (WCAG 2.1.1)"},
    {"id": "A3", "severity": "medium", "status": "open", "summary": "Button text contrast 2.8:1, needs 4.5:1 (WCAG 1.4.3)"}
  ]
}
EOF

# Body: per templates/audits/accessibility-audit.md (POUR-grouped table)
body=$(mktemp); cat > "$body" <<'EOF'
... (filled-in body — POUR groupings + Recommended priority) ...
EOF

ts=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
audit_run_persist "<project-name>" "accessibility-audit" "$ts" "fail" 60 "$body" < "$payload"
rm -f "$payload" "$body"

audit_render_trend "<project-name>" "accessibility-audit" 5

Opt-in commit

touch projects/<name>/audits/accessibility-audit/.audit-history-tracked

Rules

  1. Cite WCAG criteria numbers (e.g. 1.1.1, 2.1.1) so findings are traceable to the spec.
  2. Prioritize by user impact, not by WCAG level. A missing alt on a hero image is worse than a missing skip link.
  3. Auto-PASS for non-UI projects. CLIs, APIs, and libraries don't need this audit.
  4. Give copy-pasteable fixes where possible (the exact HTML/JSX to add, not just "fix the contrast").
  5. Always persist via the lib. The persist step runs regardless of opt-in commit state.
  6. Severity vocabulary in the JSON is lowercase. The lib expects critical/high/medium/low/info. The visible findings table can keep its conventional capitalisation.

Part of ApexYard — multi-project SDLC framework for Claude Code · MIT.

Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/me2resh/apexyard --skill accessibility-audit
Repository Details
star Stars 289
call_split Forks 174
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator