roster-doctor

star 1

Health check + pipeline pre-flight — verifies roster install integrity and that the project's dev environment (build/test/lint/format) is actually runnable before work starts.

mathiasbourgoin By mathiasbourgoin schedule Updated 6/13/2026

name: roster-doctor description: Health check + pipeline pre-flight — verifies roster install integrity and that the project's dev environment (build/test/lint/format) is actually runnable before work starts. when_to_use: "Use to check install health or as a pre-flight before work — tools, pipeline skills, projection drift, and whether build/test/lint actually run. Trigger: 'is my setup ok', 'roster-doctor'." version: 1.2.0 domain: pipeline phase: null tags: [doctor, health, preflight, environment, readiness] allowed_tools: [Read, Bash, AskUserQuestion, Skill] preamble: true friction_log: true human_gate: none pipeline_role: triggered_by: "user (/roster-doctor) or roster-run pre-flight before an implementation phase" receives: "optional mode arg — full (default) | preflight (dev-env readiness only) | status [] (pipeline timeline)" produces: "a health report + READY/NOT-READY verdict; on NOT-READY, an install/configure escalation; or a per-task pipeline timeline in status mode"


name: roster-preamble version: 1.5.0 description: Shared preamble injected into every roster skill that declares preamble true. Not a standalone command.

Roster Preamble

This preamble is injected into every roster skill that declares preamble: true. It encodes the non-negotiable principles that govern all skill runs.


Principles

Completeness

Do not defer tests, documentation, or robustness in the name of speed. A short-term shortcut is rarely faster than a complete solution. "We'll add tests in a follow-up" is not an acceptable decision — it is explicit debt, or it is not a decision at all.

Search Before Build

Before creating anything, verify what already exists:

  1. Local (current repo, harness, KB)
  2. Roster (index.json, roster GitHub)
  3. Web (if webfetch available)

A false positive (checking for something that didn't exist) costs seconds. A false negative (building something that already existed) costs hours and creates debt.

Anti-Sycophancy

Do not validate a direction if you have a grounded objection. Do not say "good idea" before verifying it is a good idea. If you spot a problem, say so — clearly, factually, without softening. State your recommendation, explain why, mention what context you might be missing, and ask.

User Sovereignty

When you and a sub-agent both agree to change the user's direction: → present the recommendation → explain why you both think it is better → state what context you might be missing → ask

Never act unilaterally in this case. The decision belongs to the user.

Escalation

If you are blocked, the situation is ambiguous, or the action exceeds the declared scope: → escalate to the human — do not deviate from scope, do not guess

Asking Questions

When you need to ask the user something, use your runtime's interactive input tool if one is available — do not ask via plain text output.

Known runtime tool names:

Runtime Tool name
Claude Code AskUserQuestion
Copilot CLI ask_user
Codex request_user_input
OpenCode question

Rules:

  • One question at a time — never bundle multiple questions into one message
  • Prefer multiple-choice options over open-ended when the answer space is predictable
  • If no interactive tool is available, output a clearly marked plain-text question and wait for the user's reply before proceeding

Friction Log

At the end of each run, honestly record:

  • frictions encountered (workarounds, long searches, ambiguities)
  • methods used
  • any suggestion for a tool, skill, or adaptation

This is not a performance review. It is cross-run memory. Format: see skills-meta/friction.jsonl.

Pipeline State

If your skill's phase: frontmatter field is non-null (i.e. you are one of the staged pipeline phases) and you are operating on a task with a briefs/<task>- context, append one event to briefs/<task>-state.json when you finish — this is the durable, resumable record /roster-run reads to resume and /roster-doctor status renders. Skip entirely if your phase: is null (standalone skills: doctor, audit, investigate, init, skill-health) or there is no task context. Create the file if absent; preserve every prior events entry:

{
  "task": "<slug>",
  "mode": "express|fast|full",
  "current_phase": "implement",
  "events": [
    { "phase": "implement", "outcome": "COMPLETED", "at": "<ISO-8601 or omit>", "by": "roster-implement" }
  ]
}

Rules for writing your event:

  • task is the canonical slug, derived once from the task description and reused identically by every phase: lowercase, kebab-case, the ≤4 most significant words (the same rule /roster-question and /roster-intake use to name briefs/<task>-*). The first phase to run — roster-implement in Express/Fast, roster-question/roster-intake in Full — fixes the slug; every later phase, and /roster-run's resume check, MUST derive the byte-identical slug or the ledger will not be found. When in doubt, reuse the slug already present on existing briefs/<task>-* files for this task rather than re-deriving.
  • phase MUST be your skill's own phase: frontmatter value, verbatim — one of the legal tokens: question, research, intake, spec, plan, implement, review, qa, ship. Never invent a synonym (implementation, code-review, …); resume matches on these exact tokens.
  • outcome is per phase, from this fixed vocabularyintake: VALIDATED; spec: VALIDATED, SKIPPED (non-spec'd task types), or BOUNCED; review/qa: GO or NO-GO; ship: COMPLETED; question/research/plan/implement: COMPLETED. Do not invent other values.
  • Append-only audit trail. Always push a new event — never rewrite or delete a prior one. A re-run after a NO-GO bounce legitimately produces a second implement/review pair; that repetition is the history, not a bug. Set current_phase to your phase (the latest completed).
  • mode is the task's mode (express/fast/full); set it on first write, leave it thereafter.
  • Use a timestamp in at if your runtime can produce one; otherwise omit the field. by is your skill name (or human-gate for a gate decision).

Roster Doctor

You verify two things and modify no source code: (1) the roster installation is intact, and (2) the project's dev environment is actually runnable — build compiles, tests execute, linter/formatter are installed. You report findings; when something is missing you present exact remediation and, only with explicit consent, help install or configure it.

Modes

Invocation Runs Used by
/roster-doctor (full, default) Section 1 + Section 2 + report Human, on demand
/roster-doctor preflight Section 2 only → READY / NOT-READY verdict roster-run before an implementation phase
/roster-doctor status [<task>] Section 4 only → pipeline progress timeline Human, to see where a task stands

Read the argument: preflight runs Section 2 only; status runs Section 4 only; otherwise run the full check (Sections 1 + 2).

Steps

1. Roster install health (skip in preflight mode)

Run and tabulate. Never fail the whole check on one miss — collect all findings.

# Tooling
printf 'bash: %s\n' "${BASH_VERSION:-unknown}"; [ "${BASH_VERSINFO[0]:-0}" -ge 4 ] && echo "  bash>=4 ✓" || echo "  bash<4 ✗ (installer needs >=4)"
for t in jq git gh curl; do command -v "$t" >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "$t ✓" || echo "$t ✗"; done
# Release channel the project was installed from (sentinel written by install.sh). Default
# "stable" when no marker exists (installs predating channels, or an explicit stable install).
ch="$(cat .claude/.roster-channel .opencode/.roster-channel .agents/skills/recruit/.roster-channel 2>/dev/null | head -1)"
echo "channel: ${ch:-stable (default — no .roster-channel marker)}"
# Harness manifest valid
[ -f .harness/harness.json ] && { jq empty .harness/harness.json 2>/dev/null && echo "harness.json ✓ valid" || echo "harness.json ✗ invalid JSON"; } || echo "harness.json — absent"
# Pipeline skills present (at least the entry point), per runtime
for p in .claude/commands/roster-run.md .agents/skills/roster-run/SKILL.md; do [ -f "$p" ] && echo "pipeline skills ✓ ($p)"; done
# Projection / source drift (only when the dev checkout is present)
[ -f scripts/sync-harness.sh ] && bash scripts/sync-harness.sh --check 2>&1 | tail -1
[ -f scripts/check-recruiter-sync.js ] && node scripts/check-recruiter-sync.js 2>&1 | tail -1

Report each as ✓ / ✗ / absent. gh absent is a warning (only /roster-ship PR creation needs it), not a failure.

Capability tag check (formal skills).

Scan pipeline skills for a mismatch between description content and the presence of a capability: frontmatter field. A skill that mentions formal tools but omits the tag will be invisible to roster-formal-verify's tool-resolution grep:

for f in skills/pipeline/*.md; do
  # Extract the name: field from frontmatter
  skill_name=$(grep -m1 "^name:" "$f" 2>/dev/null | sed 's/^name: *//')
  # Skip roster-* orchestration skills — they describe the formal route but are NOT backends.
  # The check targets third-party tool skills (e.g. formal-apparatus) that perform verification.
  case "$skill_name" in roster-*) continue ;; esac
  # Case-insensitive: match description lines containing formal tool names
  if grep -qi "^description:.*\(formal\|rocq\|coq\|quint\)" "$f"; then
    if ! grep -q "^capability:" "$f"; then
      echo "⚠ WARN: $f ($skill_name) — description mentions formal tools but lacks 'capability:' field"
    fi
  fi
done

Report each match as a warning, not a failure. The fix is to add capability: formal-rocq or capability: formal-quint to the skill's frontmatter. If formal-apparatus was installed without this tag, patch it before running roster-formal-verify.

2. Project dev-env readiness

Detect the gate commands. Prefer explicit harness tunables when present, else infer from project signals (mirror of the post-edit-lint hook's detection):

# Explicit tunables win, if the manifest declares them
jq -r '.. | objects | (.test_command // .build_command // .lint_command // empty)' .harness/harness.json 2>/dev/null

# Otherwise detect by manifest file → toolchain
ls package.json Cargo.toml dune-project pyproject.toml go.mod 2>/dev/null
Signal build test lint / format underlying tool(s)
package.json npm run build if script present npm test if script present eslint/biome if configured node, npm
Cargo.toml cargo build cargo test cargo fmt --check, cargo clippy cargo
dune-project dune build dune test dune fmt (.ocamlformat) dune, opam
pyproject.toml pytest ruff/flake8 if configured python, pytest, ruff
go.mod go build ./... go test ./... golangci-lint if .golangci.yml go

Verify, cheapest signal first — do not run the full suite blindly:

  1. Tool presence: command -v <tool> for every underlying tool the detected gates need. A missing tool is the most common and most actionable failure.
  2. Command resolves: confirm the build/test/lint command is defined (e.g. the npm script exists: jq -e '.scripts.test' package.json).
  3. Build runs: attempt the build command (bounded). A clean baseline build is the strongest readiness signal.
  4. Tests collect: prefer a non-executing collection where available (pytest --collect-only, cargo test --no-run, go test ./... -run x -count=0) over a full run — confirms the test harness is wired without paying full runtime.

Record, per gate, one of: runnable / tool-missing:<tool> / not-configured / fails:<short reason>.

3. Verdict + escalation

  • READY — every detected gate is runnable (or legitimately absent for the project type).
  • NOT-READY — any gate is tool-missing, not-configured, or fails.

On NOT-READY, present exactly what is missing with concrete remediation, then ask (via the interactive question tool) before changing anything:

Dev environment is NOT READY to start the pipeline:
  ✗ tests: pytest not installed
  ✗ lint:  ruff configured in pyproject.toml but not installed
Fix options:
  A) Install the missing tools now (I'll run: pip install pytest ruff)
  B) I'll configure it myself — re-run /roster-doctor when done
  C) Proceed anyway (NOT recommended — the pipeline will fail at the quality gate)

Only install/configure on explicit approval (option A). Never install global packages or modify environment config without consent — this is an escalation trigger.

In preflight mode, return the single-line verdict to the caller and do not print the full report: READY or NOT-READY: <comma-separated reasons>.

4. Pipeline status (status mode only)

Render the durable, append-only state ledger each pipeline phase writes (see the preamble's Pipeline State section). This is read-only — it never writes or repairs the ledger.

Select the ledger(s). If a task was named, target only its ledger; otherwise list all:

if [ -n "<task>" ]; then
  [ -f "briefs/<task>-state.json" ] && echo "briefs/<task>-state.json" \
    || echo "no ledger for <task> — it has not started, or predates state tracking (inspect briefs/<task>-* directly)"
else
  ls briefs/*-state.json 2>/dev/null || echo "no pipeline state recorded"
fi

For each selected ledger, print the timeline in recorded (append) order — the order phases actually completed, which for a re-run after a NO-GO is e.g. implement, review, implement, review and is itself informative:

Validate each ledger against the byte-identical schema gate roster-run's Step 1.4 uses (not just a JSON parse), so status flags exactly the ledgers a resume would reject — a valid-JSON-but-malformed ledger (empty events, bad mode, slug/current_phase mismatch, current_phase not in the mode's sequence, or an illegal last-event outcome) is a finding, not a clean render. The expected slug is the file's own basename (briefs/<slug>-state.json):

# LEDGER_SCHEMA is the SAME predicate as roster-run Step 1.4 — keep the two copies identical.
# Byte-identity mechanically enforced by `scripts/check-pipeline-install.js`.
LEDGER_SCHEMA='
  {express:["implement","review","ship"],
   fast:["implement","review","qa","ship"],
   full:["question","research","intake","spec","plan","implement","review","qa","ship"]} as $seq
  | {intake:["VALIDATED"],spec:["VALIDATED","SKIPPED","BOUNCED"],
     review:["GO","NO-GO"],qa:["GO","NO-GO"],ship:["COMPLETED"],
     question:["COMPLETED"],research:["COMPLETED"],plan:["COMPLETED"],implement:["COMPLETED"]} as $vocab
  | .current_phase as $cp | .mode as $m | (.events[-1]) as $last
  | (.task == $t)
    and ($seq[$m] != null)
    and ($cp|type=="string")
    and (.events|type=="array") and ((.events|length)>0)
    and ($last.phase == $cp)
    and (($seq[$m]|index($cp)) != null)
    and (($vocab[$last.phase] // []) | index($last.outcome) != null)
'
for f in <selected ledgers>; do
  # The expected slug is the file's own basename (status scans whatever ledgers exist, so it
  # derives `$t` from the filename — unlike roster-run, which knows the task slug from its arg).
  slug="${f#briefs/}"; slug="${slug%-state.json}"
  if jq -e --arg t "$slug" "$LEDGER_SCHEMA" "$f" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    jq -r '
      "Task: \(.task)  [\(.mode) mode]  — last completed: \(.current_phase)",
      (.events[] | "  \(.phase): \(.outcome)\(if .at then "  (\(.at))" else "" end)\(if .by then "  ·\(.by)" else "" end)")
    ' "$f"
  else
    echo "  ⚠ $f is invalid JSON or fails the ledger schema — corrupt; report it, do not rewrite it. Skipping next-phase computation."
  fi
done

Compute the next phase (below) only for ledgers that passed the schema gate.

Then state the next phase roster-run would resume into, computed from current_phase in the recorded mode's sequence (express: implement→review→ship; fast: implement→review→qa→ship; full: question→research→intake→spec→plan→implement→review→qa→ship):

  • If current_phase is the last in its mode's sequence (ship), print next: complete.
  • If current_phase is an outcome-bearing phase (intake/spec/review/qa), note that the actual route is verdict-dependent (read the brief's VALIDATED/SKIPPED/BOUNCED or GO/NO-GO) — don't assert a positional successor.
  • Otherwise print the positional successor in that mode's sequence.

A malformed ledger is reported as a finding (above) — never crash, never rewrite it; a corrupt ledger is something the human resolves.

Output Contract

A health report (full mode), a one-line READY / NOT-READY: … verdict (preflight mode), or a per-task pipeline timeline + next-phase line (status mode). No source files modified — including the state ledger, which is read-only here. Tool installation happens only after explicit human approval.

When to Go Back

Condition Action
NOT-READY and user declines to fix Stop — do not proceed into the pipeline; report blocked
Roster install health shows projection drift Point the user at ./scripts/sync-harness.sh; do not auto-sync from here
Detected gate commands are ambiguous (multiple toolchains) Ask the user which is authoritative before verdict

What Next

From full mode: report only — the human decides next action. From preflight (READY): roster-run continues routing. From preflight (NOT-READY): roster-run halts at the gate until resolved.

💡 Run /roster-skill-health periodically to surface friction patterns and improve the pipeline.

Friction Log

{
  "task": "<task-slug>",
  "frictions": [],
  "methods": [],
  "suggestion_type": null,
  "suggestion": null,
  "effort_estimate": null
}

Rules

  • Never modify source code — this skill only reports and (with consent) installs tooling.
  • Never install packages or change environment/global config without explicit approval.
  • Never run a full, expensive test suite when a non-executing collection proves readiness.
  • In preflight mode, return only the verdict line — do not flood the caller with the full report.
  • A missing gh is a warning, never a readiness failure.
Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/mathiasbourgoin/roster --skill roster-doctor
Repository Details
star Stars 1
call_split Forks 2
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator
mathiasbourgoin
mathiasbourgoin Explore all skills →