ring-validating-ux-completeness

name: ring:validating-ux-completeness description: "Validating that UX specifications are complete before technical design: a read-only checklist over wireframes, states, responsive behavior, accessibility, and component-library alignment, emitting a DESIGN VALIDATED / NEEDS REVISION verdict to design-validation.md. Standalone utility — run after a product-designer pass and before the TRD when the feature has UI; the pre-dev orchestrators recommend it when the feature has UI. Use to check UI design completeness. Skip for backend-only, API-only, or no-UI work."

UX Completeness Validation

Standalone utility — not a gate in any pre-dev track. Verifies that UX specifications are COMPLETE before investing in technical architecture. This is a VALIDATION pass — it checks existing artifacts, does not create new ones.

The TRD does not hard-block on this verdict: ring:writing-trds honors design-validation.md if present; if absent, it proceeds and notes the UX risk.

When to use

• Feature has UI and a standalone product-designer run produced UX artifacts
• Before starting the TRD (recommended slot: between PRD and TRD)
• The pre-dev orchestrators recommend it as an optional standalone step when the feature has UI
• User asks to "validate design" or "check if design is complete"

Skip when

• Feature is backend-only with no UI
• Pure API/infrastructure task
• Bug fix with no UX changes

Sequence

Runs before: ring:writing-trds (recommended, not required) Runs after: ring:writing-prds and a standalone product-designer run (ux-validation mode; optionally ux-design mode)

Entry Criteria

If prd.md, ux-criteria.md, or wireframes/ are missing → STOP. Report the missing artifacts and recommend a product-designer run first.

If feature has NO UI → this skill does not apply. Feature has UI if PRD contains: user stories with "see", "view", "click", "navigate", "page", "screen", "button", "form", or features involving login, dashboard, settings, profile, reports, notifications.

Validation Checklist

Section 1: Screen Completeness (CRITICAL — failure = NEEDS REVISION)

• All screens from user stories have wireframes
• Each wireframe has all required UI elements
• Interactive elements identified (buttons, forms, links)
• Navigation flows between screens defined
• No screen in user stories is missing a wireframe

Section 2: State Coverage (CRITICAL — failure = NEEDS REVISION)

• Empty states designed (no data scenarios)
• Loading states shown
• Error states for each failure scenario
• Success states for key actions
• Edge cases with extreme content (long text, many items)

Section 3: Responsive Behavior

• Desktop layout defined
• Mobile layout defined (or explicit "mobile not required" statement)
• Tablet behavior specified or derived from desktop/mobile
• Breakpoints documented

Section 4: Accessibility

• Color contrast documented (AA minimum)
• Focus order for keyboard navigation specified
• ARIA labels for non-text elements
• Screen reader behavior documented for dynamic content

Section 5: Interaction Details

• Form validation feedback shown (inline errors)
• Confirmation dialogs for destructive actions
• Feedback for async operations (loading, success, error)
• Tooltips and help text defined

Section 6: Data Display

• Pagination or infinite scroll for lists
• Sort and filter behavior defined (if applicable)
• Data formatting (dates, numbers, currency)
• Truncation behavior for long content

Section 7: Component Consistency

• Reuse of existing components documented
• New components needed identified
• Variants used consistently (button types, input states)
• Spacing and layout grid consistent

Section 8: Component Library Alignment (if UI library configured)

• Components needed exist in chosen library
• Correct variant names used (not invented variants)
• Missing components identified for custom implementation

Verdict

DESIGN VALIDATED: All Section 1-2 items pass AND ≥80% of Sections 3-8 pass.

DESIGN NEEDS REVISION: Any Section 1-2 item fails → list specific gaps → return to product-designer.

File output: docs/pre-dev/{feature}/design-validation.md

# Design Validation Report

**Feature:** {feature-name}
**Date:** {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Verdict:** DESIGN VALIDATED | DESIGN NEEDS REVISION

## Results

| Section | Status | Notes |
|---------|--------|-------|
| 1. Screen Completeness | ✅ PASS / ❌ FAIL | ... |
| 2. State Coverage | ✅ PASS / ❌ FAIL | ... |
| 3. Responsive Behavior | ✅ PASS / ⚠️ PARTIAL | ... |
...

## Gaps Found (if REVISION needed)
- [Specific gap 1]
- [Specific gap 2]

## Next Step
VALIDATED → Proceed to ring:writing-trds
REVISION → Return to product-designer with gap list

Related

• product-designer agent — produces the artifacts this skill validates (ux-research / ux-validation / ux-design modes)
• ring:writing-trds — honors design-validation.md if present; does not hard-block on it