name: tzurot-council-mcp description: 'Multi-perspective AI consultation. Invoke with /tzurot-council-mcp for major refactors (>500 lines), structured debugging after failed attempts, or when a technical decision has multiple viable approaches.' lastUpdated: '2026-04-11'
Council MCP Procedures
Invoke with /tzurot-council-mcp when you need external AI consultation.
When to Consult Council
Always Use For
- Major Refactorings (>500 lines)
- Before Completing Major PRs
- When Thinking "This seems unnecessary" - STOP! Consult before removing code.
- Structured Debugging
Don't Use For
- Questions answered by existing docs/skills
- Obvious code issues (typos, syntax errors)
- Small style preferences
Debugging Procedure
mcp__council__debug({
error_message: 'Memory leak in BullMQ workers',
code_context: 'Workers OOM after 2 hours',
previous_attempts: ['Checked event listeners', 'Reviewed Redis connections'],
});
Code Review Procedure
mcp__council__code_review({
code: changes,
focus: 'behavior preservation, edge cases',
language: 'typescript',
});
Refactoring Plan Procedure
mcp__council__refactor({
code: myCode,
goal: 'reduce_complexity', // extract_method, simplify_logic, improve_naming, etc.
language: 'typescript',
});
Brainstorming Procedure
mcp__council__brainstorm({
topic: 'Risks in refactoring PersonalityService',
constraints: 'Must maintain exact functionality',
});
Model Selection
Always call list_models first
Council model IDs drift faster than most other tool parameters. Providers rename and remove preview models as they ship new versions — IDs cached from a prior session, skill, or doc are often wrong by the time you use them.
Always call mcp__council__list_models before specifying a model by ID. Don't trust IDs in this skill, in code comments, or in your own memory.
// Run BEFORE picking a model:
mcp__council__list_models({ provider: 'google', search: 'gemini' });
mcp__council__list_models({ provider: 'anthropic', search: 'claude' });
// Or get a task-based recommendation:
mcp__council__recommend_model({ task: 'reasoning' });
Known drift incident (2026-04-09): google/gemini-3-pro-preview returned 404 mid-session — it had been superseded by google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview. Cached IDs from prior sessions are landmines.
When a model 404s mid-session
End the failed session, call list_models to find a replacement with similar capabilities (reasoning → reasoning, coding → coding), and restart. Do not retry the original ID — it's gone, not transient.
Recommended models by task
| Task Type | Recommended Models | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning/Design | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview → Claude Sonnet/Opus | Avoid DeepSeek R1 — it's dated; reasoning/design needs SOTA |
| Coding/Review | Claude Sonnet 4, Claude Opus 4 | Tool-use variants of Gemini also work for structured refactor tasks |
| Vision/Images | Gemini 2.5 Flash, Gemini 2.5 Pro | (verify availability with list_models) |
| Long Documents | Gemini (1M token context) | (verify availability with list_models) |
Why avoid DeepSeek R1 for reasoning/design: explicit user feedback (2026-04-09) — "In the future, I would recommend not using R1 because again, it is dated. There are better models out there." R1 is acceptable for narrow factual queries but not for architectural decisions that ship to users. Default to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (or current SOTA equivalent — verify with list_models). If Gemini is unavailable, fall back to Claude Sonnet 4 / Opus 4, not R1.
Per-call model specification
mcp__council__code_review({
code: myCode,
model: 'anthropic/claude-sonnet-4', // verify with list_models first
});
Multi-Turn Conversations
// Verify the model ID first (drift!)
const models = await mcp__council__list_models({ provider: 'google', search: 'gemini' });
// pick a current SOTA reasoning model from the response
// Start session
const { session_id } = await mcp__council__start_conversation({
model: 'google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview', // ⚠️ verify with list_models — IDs drift
system_prompt: 'You are a TypeScript architecture expert',
initial_message: 'Review this service design...',
});
// Continue
await mcp__council__continue_conversation({
session_id,
message: 'What about the error handling?',
});
// End and summarize
await mcp__council__end_conversation({
session_id,
summarize: true,
});
When Council and Claude Disagree
Resolution hierarchy:
- Project guidelines (CLAUDE.md, rules)
- Existing codebase patterns
- Technical correctness
- User preference
Available Tools
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
mcp__council__ask |
General questions |
mcp__council__brainstorm |
Brainstorm ideas |
mcp__council__code_review |
Code review |
mcp__council__debug |
Structured debugging |
mcp__council__refactor |
Refactoring plans |
mcp__council__test_cases |
Test case suggestions |
mcp__council__explain |
Explain code/concepts |
mcp__council__recommend_model |
Model recommendations |