eval-prompt

name: eval-prompt description: Evaluate a PAL inference prompt using the promptfoo harness in eval/. Use when a prompt constant in src/ has changed or may have regressed, when scaffolding a new prompt eval from scratch, or when comparing a v2 candidate against the current baseline. argument-hint: [promptfoo-flags]

eval-prompt

Maintainer-only skill. Operates on the eval/ directory of the PAL repo. Do not use outside this repo.

Workflow

Running an existing eval

1. Run the eval, forwarding any extra flags the user passed:

   bun eval/run.ts <prompt-name> [--providers haiku] [--no-cache] [--filter-pattern "A1"]
   

2. Read the results table. For each failing test, note the prompt column (v1 vs v2) and the expected vs actual sentiment/rating field.
3. Report: pass rate per prompt, which cases failed, and whether v2 outperforms v1.

Crystallizing a winning prompt

When v2 passes ≥95% of cases and outperforms v1 on its target failures:

1. Copy the winning prompt text back into its source constant in src/ (read the source file first to locate the constant).
2. Overwrite v1 with v2: cp eval/<name>/prompts/v2-<desc>.json eval/<name>/prompts/v1-current.json
3. Remove or archive the v2 file.
4. Run the eval again to confirm v1 now passes at the higher rate.

Scaffolding a new eval

When no eval/<name>/ exists yet:

1. Create the folder structure:

   eval/<name>/
     promptfoo.yaml
     prompts/
       v1-current.json
     assertions/
   

2. Extract the current prompt from src/ into eval/<name>/prompts/v1-current.json using chat format:

   [
     { "role": "system", "content": "<system prompt text>" },
     { "role": "user",   "content": "{{userMessage}}" }
   ]
   

   If the production code calls injectJsonSchemaInstruction(), append the schema instruction to the system prompt string — that is what the model receives.

3. Write promptfoo.yaml. Use this template:

   description: "<name> — v1 baseline vs v2 candidate"
   
   prompts:
     - file://prompts/v1-current.json
   
   providers:
     - id: anthropic:messages:claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
       label: haiku
       config:
         output_format:
           type: json_schema
           schema: <paste the output JSON schema here>
     - id: openai:chat:gpt-4o-mini
       label: gpt-4o-mini
   
   defaultTest:
     assert:
       - type: javascript
         value: file://assertions/valid-json.js
         description: "Output must be a parseable JSON object"
   
   tests: []
   

4. Write assertion files. Each file is one line using the shared factory in eval/lib/assert.js:

   // assertions/not-negative.js
   const { makeCheck } = require("../../lib/assert");
   module.exports = makeCheck("sentiment", "ne", "negative");
   

   Available ops: 'eq' 'ne' 'null' 'not-null'. For custom logic, write a plain function that calls require("../../lib/parse-output") directly.

5. Write labeled test cases in promptfoo.yaml:

   • A — inputs that must NOT produce a specific value (false-positive corpus)
   • B — inputs that MUST produce a specific value (true positives)
   • C — neutral / null cases
   • D — explicit / direct signal cases Aim for 8–16 cases minimum, sourced from failure corpus and real interaction logs.

6. Run: bun eval/run.ts <name> --providers haiku --no-cache

Adding a v2 candidate

1. Copy v1-current.json → v2-<description>.json in eval/<name>/prompts/.
2. Add the new file to prompts: in promptfoo.yaml.
3. Run the eval and iterate on the prompt text until failing cases pass without breaking passing ones.

Shared infrastructure

Do not modify these files unless changing behaviour for all evals:

After any change to shared infrastructure, run bun eval/run.ts sentiment --no-cache to confirm no regressions.

Output format

Report results as:

• Pass rate per prompt (e.g. "v1: 17/19 (89%), v2: 19/19 (100%)")
• Which test IDs failed and why (field value vs expected)
• Recommendation: crystallize v2, iterate further, or v1 holds

When to use / Do NOT use

Use when:

• A prompt constant in src/ changed and regression check is needed
• Adding a new classification prompt that needs labeled test coverage
• Comparing two prompt variants before committing one

Do NOT use when:

• The prompt has no eval directory yet and the user hasn't asked to scaffold one (ask first)
• Running evals for non-PAL projects (this skill is repo-specific)