name: "cirf" version: "1.0.0" description: "Interactive crypto deep-research framework with agent-agent and human-agent collaboration for superior research outcomes" author: name: "Kudō" social: "https://x.com/kudodefi" homepage: "https://github.com/kudodefi/cirf" metadata: emoji: "🔬" category: "research"
CIRF - Crypto Interactive Research Framework
FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW
CIRF is a systematic crypto research framework with:
- 4 Specialized Agents with distinct expertise
- 17 Research Workflows covering market, project, and technical analysis
- Workspace System for project isolation and output management
Framework Location: ./framework/
Workspaces Location: ./workspaces/
AGENT REGISTRY
🔬 Research Analyst
- File:
./framework/agents/research-analyst.yaml - Expertise: Market intelligence, project fundamentals, investment synthesis
- Workflows: All research workflows (sector, project, competitive, trend, traction, tokenomics, etc.)
- Use for: Market analysis, project evaluation, investment thesis
⚙️ Technology Analyst
- File:
./framework/agents/technology-analyst.yaml - Expertise: Architecture assessment, security analysis, technical evaluation
- Workflows: technology-analysis
- Use for: Smart contract review, protocol architecture, technical due diligence
✍️ Content Creator
- File:
./framework/agents/content-creator.yaml - Expertise: Research-to-content transformation, multi-platform optimization
- Workflows: create-content
- Use for: Converting research into threads, articles, reports
✓ QA Specialist
- File:
./framework/agents/qa-specialist.yaml - Expertise: Quality validation, critical review, bias detection
- Workflows: qa-review
- Use for: Reviewing outputs, challenging assumptions, finding gaps
WORKFLOW REGISTRY
Setup & Planning
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
framework-init |
First-time user configuration |
create-research-brief |
Define research scope & objectives |
Market Intelligence
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
sector-overview |
Sector structure, dynamics, key players |
sector-landscape |
Ecosystem mapping, player categorization |
competitive-analysis |
Head-to-head project comparison |
trend-analysis |
Trend identification & forecasting |
Project Fundamentals
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
project-snapshot |
Quick project overview |
product-analysis |
Product mechanics, PMF, innovation |
team-and-investor-analysis |
Team background, investor quality |
tokenomics-analysis |
Token economics, sustainability |
traction-metrics |
Growth, retention, unit economics |
social-sentiment |
Community health, sentiment |
Technical & Quality
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
technology-analysis |
Architecture, security, code quality |
qa-review |
Validation, bias detection, gap analysis |
Content & Flexible
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
create-content |
Multi-format content package |
open-research |
Custom research on any topic |
brainstorm |
Ideation and exploration |
ORCHESTRATION PROTOCOL
STEP 1: UNDERSTAND
Parse user's research goal:
- Subject: Project, sector, or topic
- Outcome: Investment decision, market understanding, content, etc.
- Scope: Depth, time horizon, specific focus areas
If unclear, ask clarifying questions before proceeding.
STEP 2: PLAN & BUILD TASK QUEUE
Create task queue with this structure:
TASK QUEUE: {research_goal}
Workspace: {workspace_id}
Created: {timestamp}
| Task ID | Workflow | Agent | Status | Depends On |
|---------|----------|-------|--------|------------|
| T1 | {workflow} | {agent} | pending | - |
| T2 | {workflow} | {agent} | pending | - |
| T3 | {workflow} | {agent} | pending | T1, T2 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Status values: pending → in_progress → completed | failed
Dependency rules:
- Tasks with no dependencies can run in parallel
- Tasks wait for all dependencies to complete
- Group tasks by agent for efficient spawning
STEP 3: CONFIRM
Present plan to user:
RESEARCH PLAN: {goal}
Will execute {n} tasks across {n} agents:
PHASE 1 (Parallel):
• T1: {workflow} ({agent})
• T2: {workflow} ({agent})
PHASE 2 (After Phase 1):
• T3-T5: {description}
PHASE 3 (Final):
• T6: {workflow}
Proceed? [yes / adjust / questions]
Wait for user approval before execution.
STEP 4: EXECUTE WITH PROGRESS TRACKING
4.1 Spawn agents by grouping:
- Group all tasks assigned to same agent
- Spawn one sub-agent per agent-type with their full task list
- Sub-agent executes tasks sequentially, respecting dependencies
4.2 Update progress after each task completion:
PROGRESS UPDATE
═══════════════════════════════════════════
Overall: ████████░░░░░░░░ 50% (4/8 tasks)
✅ COMPLETED:
• T1: {workflow} → {key finding summary}
• T2: {workflow} → {key finding summary}
🔄 IN PROGRESS:
• T3: {workflow} ({agent})
⏳ PENDING:
• T4: {workflow} (waiting for T3)
• T5: {workflow} (waiting for T3, T4)
═══════════════════════════════════════════
STEP 5: CONSOLIDATE
When all tasks complete:
- Collect outputs from
./workspaces/{workspace}/outputs/ - Synthesize key findings across all analyses
- Generate final deliverable
- Present to user with confidence level and recommendations
SUB-AGENT SPAWN PROTOCOL
Spawn agent with assigned task queue:
SPAWN: {agent-type}
IDENTITY:
Read and embody: ./framework/agents/{agent-id}.yaml
WORKSPACE:
./workspaces/{workspace-id}/
TASK QUEUE:
| Task ID | Workflow | Status | Depends On |
|---------|----------|--------|------------|
| T1 | {workflow-1} | pending | - |
| T3 | {workflow-2} | pending | T1 |
| T6 | {workflow-3} | pending | T3 |
EXECUTION PROTOCOL:
For each task in queue (in dependency order):
1. CHECK DEPENDENCIES
- If dependencies not completed, wait or skip to next available task
2. UPDATE STATUS
- Mark task: in_progress
3. READ WORKFLOW FILES
- ./framework/workflows/{workflow-id}/workflow.yaml
- ./framework/workflows/{workflow-id}/objectives.md
- ./framework/workflows/{workflow-id}/template.md
4. READ CONTEXT
- ./framework/core-config.yaml (user preferences)
- ./workspaces/{workspace}/workspace.yaml (project context)
5. EXECUTE
- Follow methodology in objectives.md
- Apply output structure from template.md
6. SAVE OUTPUT
- Path: ./workspaces/{workspace}/outputs/{workflow-id}/{workflow-id}-{date}.md
7. UPDATE STATUS
- Mark task: completed
8. REPORT TO ORCHESTRATOR
- task_id
- output_path
- key_findings (3-5 bullets)
- confidence (high/medium/low)
COMPLETION:
When all assigned tasks done, report final summary to orchestrator.
WORKSPACE MANAGEMENT
Initialize Workspace
Before execution, ensure workspace exists:
- Check if
./workspaces/{workspace-id}/exists - If not, create workspace:
- Copy template from
./framework/_workspace.yaml - Create
documents/directory - Create
outputs/directory
- Copy template from
- Update workspace.yaml with project metadata
Output Structure
workspaces/{project}/
├── workspace.yaml # Project configuration
├── documents/ # Source materials, references
└── outputs/
├── sector-overview/
│ └── sector-overview-{date}.md
├── project-snapshot/
│ └── project-snapshot-{date}.md
├── tokenomics-analysis/
│ └── tokenomics-analysis-{date}.md
└── ...
CONFIGURATION
Read ./framework/core-config.yaml at initialization:
| Field | Purpose |
|---|---|
status.initialized |
If false, run framework-init first |
user.name |
For personalized communication |
language.communication |
Interaction language (en/vi/zh) |
language.output |
Output document language (en/vi/zh) |
user.currency |
Currency format preference |
user.date_format |
Date format preference |
ERROR HANDLING
If a task fails:
- Mark status:
failed - Log error: Record reason in task queue
- Notify orchestrator with error details
- Determine action:
- Retry: Attempt task again (max 2 retries)
- Skip: Continue if non-critical (mark skipped)
- Pause: Stop execution and ask user for guidance
⚠️ TASK FAILED
═══════════════════════════════════════════
Task: T3 - tokenomics-analysis
Agent: Research Analyst
Error: {error description}
Options:
1. Retry task
2. Skip and continue
3. Pause and review
═══════════════════════════════════════════
QUALITY STANDARDS
All research outputs must:
- Source citations: Include source name, date, and credibility level
- Information classification: Distinguish verified facts vs credible reports vs speculation
- Confidence levels: State confidence (high/medium/low) for conclusions
- Language compliance: Follow
language.outputsetting - Terminology: Preserve English crypto domain terms regardless of output language
- Structure: Follow workflow template.md format
QUICK REFERENCE
Activation Checklist
- Read this SKILL.md
- Check
./framework/core-config.yaml→status.initialized - If not initialized, run
framework-initworkflow - Ready to accept research goals
Research Execution Flow
User Goal → Understand → Plan → Confirm → Execute → Consolidate → Deliver
Key Paths
| Resource | Path |
|---|---|
| Agents | ./framework/agents/{agent-id}.yaml |
| Workflows | ./framework/workflows/{workflow-id}/ |
| Config | ./framework/core-config.yaml |
| Workspace Template | ./framework/_workspace.yaml |
| Workspaces | ./workspaces/{workspace-id}/ |
| Outputs | ./workspaces/{workspace-id}/outputs/{workflow-id}/ |