name: working-summary disable-model-invocation: true description: Use when the user asks for a work summary, weekly report, 工作总结,周报,working summary, or sprint/period recap. Aggregates GitHub PR/commit/issue activity from configured repos, optionally reads Linear cycle issues via MCP, honors Chinese public holidays, and produces a markdown report. Default range is the previous Mon-Sun week.
Working Summary
Generate a period work summary by aggregating GitHub PR/commit activity across configured repositories and — optionally — Linear cycle issues. The default time range is the previous Mon–Sun week, computed with awareness of Chinese public holidays. Output is markdown, suitable for Obsidian or any note system.
Config
Config path (default): ~/.config/working-summary/config.yaml
Override via --config <path>.
If the file is missing, tell the user to copy config.example.yaml (next to this skill) into the expected path and edit. Do not fabricate defaults.
github:
user: innei # optional; falls back to `gh api user -q .login`
orgs: # org-scope query — ONE gh search call per org
- lobehub
- lobehub-biz
repos: # optional explicit repos (in addition to orgs)
- innei/next-real-comment
- mx-space/core
include_commits: true # pull per-repo commits for active repos
linear: # optional, needs `linear` CLI authed
workspace: lobehub # informational
team: LOBE # team key (issue prefix)
cycle: auto # previous | current | auto
include_states: [In Progress, Done]
output:
# Language for synthesized prose. Section headers and raw PR/issue/commit
# titles are kept verbatim regardless; only descriptions and framing prose
# follow this setting. Examples: zh-CN, en, ja
language: zh-CN
# Optional persistence target. When set, the user may choose to save the
# report to `dir` at the end of a run. Leave unset to operate ephemerally.
dir: ~/Documents/Obsidian/Reports
# Placeholders: {year} {month} {week} {start} {end} {ext}
filename: '{year}-{month}-w{week}.{ext}'
Output Flow
The skill never writes a file by default. It synthesizes markdown in the conversation (which serves as the terminal display) and then asks the user whether to persist the result.
At the end of synthesis, prompt the user with these options:
| Choice | Behavior |
|---|---|
no / nothing |
Done. Report lives only in the conversation. |
md |
Write markdown to output.dir/{filename} (ext=md). |
html |
Render themed HTML to $TMPDIR/working-summary-<stamp>.html via scripts/render_html.py, run open on it, then ask whether to also move a copy to output.dir/{filename} (ext=html). |
both |
Do md and html in that order. |
Default choice from config: when output.format is set in the config
file, use it as the highlighted default in the prompt (e.g.
format: html → "落盘否?[html / md / both / no]"). The user can still
override by typing another choice. When output.format is unset or is
markdown, highlight md as default. When output.format is both,
highlight both.
The HTML renderer is a deterministic post-processor — the LLM only ever produces markdown. See HTML Rendering below.
Never overwrite an existing file silently. If the target exists, ask the user (append, overwrite, or new suffix).
Default Time Range
The skill uses a previous Mon–Sun week as the default:
| Today is | Range |
|---|---|
| Mon | [last Mon, yesterday Sun] |
| Tue..Sat | [prev Mon, prev Sun] |
| Sun | [prev Mon, prev Sun] (not this Sun) |
Explicit overrides:
--from YYYY-MM-DD --to YYYY-MM-DD— hard range--from YYYY-MM-DD— start from date, end at today--date YYYY-MM-DD— pretend today is this date, then apply default rule
Chinese public holidays
scripts/compute_range.py uses the chinesecalendar Python library (loaded via uv --with chinesecalendar) to classify each day as workday / holiday. The orchestrator always emits a range.breakdown containing {date, weekday, workday, holiday} for every day, plus aggregated workdays / holidays counts. Use this data to:
- Annotate the report header (e.g. "本周 3 工作日、2 节假日")
- Decide whether the range is meaningful at all (if
workdays == 0, ask the user whether they want the previous working week instead)
Data Collection
Step 1 — run the orchestrator
python skills/automation/working-summary/scripts/collect.py \
[--config PATH] \
[--from YYYY-MM-DD --to YYYY-MM-DD | --date YYYY-MM-DD]
Returns JSON to stdout:
{
"range": { "start": "...", "end": "...", "workdays": N, "holidays": N, "breakdown": [...] },
"config": { "author": "...", "orgs": [...], "repos": [...], "include_commits": true, "linear": {...}, "output": {...} },
"github": {
"owner/repo": {
"prs_merged": [...], // reconstructed from commit (#NNN) refs → /repos/{r}/pulls/{n}
"prs_open": [...], // /repos/{r}/pulls?state=open, filtered by author + updated window
"commits": [...], // /repos/{r}/commits?author=&since=&until=
"issues": [...] // /repos/{r}/issues?assignee=&since=, PRs filtered out
}
}
}
Why REST instead of gh search — the previous version used gh search prs/issues for org-wide queries. That index is unreliable: private orgs are unindexed entirely, and even public mono-repos return partial results (one test run showed 1/27 merged PRs hit). The current flow:
GET /orgs/{org}/repos— page through every repo (incl. private), then merge with explicitrepos.- Per-repo
GET /repos/{r}/commits?author=...&since/until— concurrent (16 workers). Commits filtered by GIT author + merge date window. Empty repos (HTTP 409) and archived repos (404) are silently skipped. - Merged PRs are reconstructed from commit message refs: every
(#NNN)in a commit message becomes aGET /repos/{r}/pulls/{n}call. Because commit dates are merge dates, these PRs are guaranteed merged in window. - For "active" repos (had commits) plus explicit repos, fetch open PRs (
/pulls?state=open) and assigned issues (/issues), filter by author + updatedAt client-side.
Set github.include_commits: false to skip steps 2-3 entirely (only open PRs / issues on the explicit repo list).
Step 2 — Linear (optional, via linear CLI)
When config.linear.team is set, collect.py invokes scripts/fetch_linear.py which shells out to linear api (the GraphQL endpoint of @schpet/linear-cli). Requires linear auth login once.
- Resolve
viewer.idvia{ viewer { id } }. - Resolve the target cycle for
linear.teamperlinear.cycle:previous— most recently completed cycle (endsAt <= today, maxendsAt)current— cycle whose[startsAt, endsAt)contains todayauto— cycle whose[startsAt, endsAt]overlaps the computedrange(max overlap wins)
- Query
issues(filter: { team, cycle, assignee = viewer })with optional state filter fromlinear.include_states. - Each issue carries
attachments— GitHub PR/commit URLs are exposed there, enabling PR ↔ issue linking without text matching.
The script returns null (silent) when:
- the
linearbinary is missing, - the user is not authenticated,
- the cycle cannot be resolved.
In any of those cases, the report continues with GitHub-only output and must note that Linear was skipped.
In addition to the report cycle (resolved against the date range), the script also fetches the active cycle (the one containing today) and pulls only its started issues. For the typical "previous Mon-Sun" weekly report these are different cycles — the report cycle is the cycle that just ended, the active cycle is what the user is currently working on. When the two happen to be the same cycle, the in-progress slice is filtered from the already-fetched issues with no extra round-trip.
{
"linear": {
"team": "LOBE",
"viewer_id": "...",
"cycle": { "number": 9, "name": "...", "startsAt": "...", "endsAt": "...", "progress": 0.37 },
"issues": [
{
"identifier": "LOBE-6603",
"title": "...",
"state": "Done",
"stateType": "completed",
"priority": 1,
"priorityLabel": "Urgent",
"labels": ["🐛 Bug", "Improvement"],
"url": "https://linear.app/.../LOBE-6603",
"completedAt": "...",
"attachments": [
{ "url": "https://github.com/.../pull/13481", "title": "...", "sourceType": "github" }
]
}
],
"in_progress": {
"cycle": { "number": 10, "name": "2026.04 W2", ... },
"issues": [ /* same shape as above; only state.type == "started" */ ]
}
}
}
The report's "Linear cycle snapshot" section MUST surface in_progress.issues under a sub-heading like "本周仍在进行(active cycle #N)" so the user sees both retrospective Done items and forward-looking work in one place. Skip the sub-heading when in_progress.issues is empty.
Step 3 — noise filter
Drop the following from Highlights (they may still appear under a collapsible "Chore" section if substantial):
- i18n / locale-only sync
- Submodule bumps, lockfile-only updates
- Formatting-only, single-line config tweaks
Substantive work (features, non-trivial fixes, infra, security) always appears in Highlights.
Report Synthesis
Synthesize markdown from the collected JSON.
Language rule
The output language is controlled by output.language in config (default zh-CN). The rule is:
- Translated to
output.language— readable descriptions, framing prose, headers you author yourself, callout text, follow-up notes. - Kept verbatim regardless of language — fixed section labels (
In Progress,Features,Fixes,Refactor,Build / CI / Deps, etc.), and raw PR / issue / commit titles (these are quoted verbatim for traceability — never translate them).
So even when language: zh-CN, a Highlights bullet looks like:
- 在 ChatInput 中注册 ReactMentionPlugin,使 @ 插入的 mention 节点真正渲染 — `fix(editor): add ReactMentionPlugin to ChatInput for mention node rendering` [lobehub#13415](https://...)
The prose half is 中文; the backtick-quoted raw title and the link text stay English (or whatever the original PR author wrote).
The synthesized language applies to descriptions even when the PR body is in a different language — the description is your paraphrase, written in output.language, distilled from the body.
Sections
Header — period title, date range, workday/holiday count, repo count + activity totals.
一、全局总览 (Global Overview) — All repos aggregated into a single themed listing. Group by
feat / fix / refactor / build·ci·deps. Each entry has the form:- <readable one-sentence description in PR-author's language> — `<raw PR title>` [<repo>#<num>](url)The readable description is synthesized from the PR body (
prs_merged[].bodyis included for this purpose). It explains what was done and why, in plain prose. The raw title + link follow as traceability — never omit them. Commits without a PR ref get the same treatment but link to the commit URL.二、仓库汇总 (Per-Repo Breakdown) — Same items regrouped by repository. Use compact one-line bullets here (no need to repeat the full readable description) since the global overview already carries the prose.
三、未合并 / 跟进 (Follow-ups) — closed-but-unmerged PRs needing reopen, open PRs, assigned issues still open, stale work, Linear issues without PRs.
Linear cycle snapshot — if Linear is configured and connected.
Use Obsidian callouts where appropriate:
> [!success]— shipped highlights> [!info]— context / cycle snapshot> [!warning]— follow-up actions
PR ↔ Linear linking heuristics
Match a merged PR to a Linear issue when:
- PR title or body contains the Linear issue identifier (e.g.
TEAM-123) - Branch name starts with the issue identifier
- An
attachmentsentry on the Linear issue links to the PR URL
Flag any merged PR with no Linear match as an untracked item.
Persistence Targets
When the user opts to persist (see Output Flow above), expand placeholders from the computed range before constructing the filename:
{year}/{month}— fromrange.end{week}— ISO week number ofrange.end{start}/{end}—YYYY-MM-DD{ext}—mdorhtmldepending on the chosen format
Targets:
- markdown →
{output.dir}/{filename}(ext=md) - html temporary →
$TMPDIR/working-summary-{start}-{end}.htmlthenopenit - html permanent (optional follow-up) →
{output.dir}/{filename}(ext=html)
Never overwrite an existing file silently — if present, ask the user (append, overwrite, or new suffix).
HTML Rendering
HTML is produced deterministically by scripts/render_html.py, not by
the LLM. This keeps token cost low and the visual theme consistent across
runs.
scripts/render_html.py \
--markdown <md-file | -> \
[--json collected.json] \
[--lang zh-CN] \
[--title "2026-W14"] \
[--user innei] [--host reports] \
-o <out.html | ->
Inputs
--markdown(required) — the synthesized markdown report. Pass-to read from stdin. The script extracts<h1>as report title and parses the header paragraph (**周期**/**作者**/**仓库**) plus the leading blockquote for the summary callout.--json(optional) —collect.pyJSON output. When provided, meta grid and activity-heat stats are computed from structured data instead of scraping the markdown. Prefer this when available.
What the script does
markdown-it-pyconverts the report body to HTML fragment.- BeautifulSoup post-process passes:
- extract h1 → typewriter header
- peel off header metadata
<p>+ summary<blockquote>and render them as a meta-grid and a shipped callout - drop stray top-level
<hr> - convert
> [!kind]blockquotes into.callout.<kind>divs - wrap each repo
<h3>inside the「仓库汇总」section in<details>(first open) with acopybutton; the*(N commits)*suffix becomes the right-aligned count badge - wrap each
<h2>+ its following siblings in<section id=slug> - scan every
<li>for a conventional-commit prefix in any<code>descendant (feat|fix|refactor|perf|build|ci|chore|docs|test|style|revert) and prepend a colored.tagspan - assign slug ids to section h3 headings so the sidebar TOC can link to sub-items
- The shell (CSS + HTML + JS) lives in
scripts/templates/report.htmland is filled viastring.Template. It honorsprefers-color-scheme(dark by default, light on light systems) and includes a dedicated@media printtheme that switches to black-on-white, hides the sidebar/toolbar, expands every<details>, and appends(url)to anchors for print traceability. - Output is a single self-contained HTML file — no external assets.
Degradation: if the markdown lacks the expected header paragraphs or the「仓库汇总」section, the script still renders a plain themed page without the meta grid or collapsible repo blocks. It never raises.
After the report
Offer — and wait for explicit confirmation — before any write action:
- Close Linear issues whose PRs were merged in the window
- Create Linear issues for substantive untracked PRs
- Create GitHub issues for trivial but recurring follow-ups
Sub-scripts (debugging)
scripts/compute_range.py --classify— print the computed range and per-day holiday breakdown.scripts/compute_range.py --date 2026-04-06 --classify— simulate running on a specific date.scripts/fetch_github.py --author innei --repo mx-space/core --from 2026-03-30 --to 2026-04-05— single repo.scripts/fetch_github.py --author innei --org lobehub --org lobehub-biz --from 2026-03-30 --to 2026-04-05— expand both orgs, full pipeline.scripts/fetch_github.py ... --no-commits— skip commit + merged-PR reconstruction; only open PRs / issues on explicit repos.scripts/fetch_linear.py --team LOBE --cycle auto --from 2026-03-30 --to 2026-04-05— Linear-only fetch, useful for debugging cycle resolution.scripts/render_html.py --markdown report.md -o /tmp/out.html— render a standalone markdown file into themed HTML. Add--json collected.jsonto enrich the meta grid and stats.
Dependencies
ghCLI, authenticated (gh auth status)uv(for script shebangs —collect.pypullspyyaml+chinesecalendar,render_html.pypullsmarkdown-it-py+beautifulsoup4on first run)linearCLI, authenticated (linear auth login) — only required ifconfig.linearis set- Make scripts executable once:
chmod +x skills/automation/working-summary/scripts/*.py