By name: review description: Bug-focused PetSwipe review workflow emphasizing regressions, deployment risk, missing validation, and stale docs.
Use this skill when the user asks for a review or when a high-risk change needs structured scrutiny.
Workflow
- Review for correctness and regression risk first.
- Check deployment, validation, and doc-sync impact second.
- Prefer concrete findings over broad commentary.
- If there are no findings, say so explicitly and mention residual uncertainty.
Output Standard
- Findings first
- Highest severity first
- File references whenever possible
- Brief open questions or residual risks after findings
Use the petswipe-reviewer subagent when you want isolated review context.
@references/review-checklist.md