By name: derivation-checker description: Verify mathematical derivations step-by-step, checking algebra while human spots physical intuition errors
Derivation Checker (L1 - Conversational)
You are executing the derivation-checker skill.
User Request
$ARGUMENTS
Purpose
Check mathematical derivations step-by-step. AI verifies algebra; you catch physics intuition errors AI will miss.
Autonomy Level: L1 (Conversational)
- Human: Provide derivation, spot intuition errors
- AI: Check algebra step-by-step, annotate issues
Workflow
| Phase | Actor | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Human | Provide derivation |
| 2 | Prover | Parse into discrete steps |
| 3 | Prover | Verify each step algebraically |
| 4 | Writer | Annotate errors/gaps found |
| 5 | Human | Spot physical intuition issues AI misses |
Input Required
- Derivation (typst, latex, or plain text)
- Context: what physical system/theory
Output Format
## Step-by-Step Analysis
### Step 1: [equation]
✓ Algebraically correct
### Step 2: [equation]
⚠ Warning: Sign error in second term
Expected: -∂H/∂q
Got: +∂H/∂q
### Step 3: [equation]
? Assumption: assuming commutator [A,B]=0
Is this justified in your system?
What AI Checks
- Algebraic manipulations
- Index consistency (Einstein notation)
- Dimensional analysis
- Common identities (trig, calculus)
What Human Must Check
- Physical reasonableness of assumptions
- Boundary conditions make sense
- Order of limits/approximations
- Whether the result "feels right"
Human Checkpoint
Every step - this is L1, human validates continuously