name: joint-surrogate-learning-neuromorphic description: DMOSOPT — scalable optimization framework using jointly learned surrogate models for constrained multi-objective optimization of neural dynamical systems. Learns smooth approximations of objective landscapes and feasibility boundaries to guide search with unified gradients. version: 1.0.0 metadata: hermes: tags: [multi-objective-optimization, surrogate-models, DMOSOPT, neural-dynamics, supercomputing, constrained-optimization] source_paper: "Joint Surrogate Learning of Objectives, Constraints, and Sensitivities for Efficient Multi-objective Optimization of Neural Dynamical Systems (arXiv:2603.20984)" citations: 0
DMOSOPT: Joint Surrogate Learning for Neural System Optimization
Overview
Paper: arXiv:2603.20984 (2026-03-22) Authors: Gressmann, Frithjof; Raikov, Ivan Georgiev; Kim, Seung Hyun; Gazzola, Mattia; Rauchwerger, Lawrence
Biophysical neural system simulations are among the most computationally demanding scientific applications. Their optimization requires navigating high-dimensional parameter spaces under numerous constraints with binary feasible/infeasible partitions and no gradient signal. DMOSOPT introduces a unified, jointly learned surrogate model that captures the interplay between objectives, constraints, and parameter sensitivities.
Key Contributions
- Unified Joint Surrogate — Single model learns objectives, constraints, and sensitivities simultaneously
- Smooth Approximation — Learns smooth approximations of objective landscapes and feasibility boundaries
- Unified Gradient Steering — Provides gradients that simultaneously steer toward better objectives and constraint satisfaction
- Sensitivity Estimation — Partial derivatives yield per-parameter sensitivity estimates for targeted exploration
- Supercomputing Scale — Validated from single-cell dynamics to population-level networks at scale
Problem Setting
Challenge
- High-Dimensional Parameter Spaces: Neural models have many tunable parameters
- Binary Constraints: Feasible/infeasible regions with no gradient signal
- Computational Cost: Each simulation evaluation is expensive
- Multi-Objective: Multiple competing objectives to optimize simultaneously
DMOSOPT Solution
Training Data → Joint Surrogate Model → Unified Gradient + Sensitivities → Guided Optimization → Fewer Evaluations
Joint Surrogate Model
Components
- Objective Surrogate: Smooth approximation of the objective function landscape
- Constraint Surrogate: Smooth approximation of the feasibility boundary
- Sensitivity Estimator: Partial derivatives provide per-parameter importance
Unified Gradient
The joint surrogate provides a single gradient signal that:
- Steers toward improvement: Direction of objective optimization
- Respects constraints: Avoids infeasible regions
- Guides exploration: Sensitivity estimates focus search on impactful parameters
Optimization Pipeline
- Initial Sampling: Generate initial parameter configurations (e.g., Latin hypercube)
- Evaluation: Run expensive simulations for each configuration
- Surrogate Training: Fit joint surrogate model to collected data
- Gradient-Guided Search: Use surrogate gradients to propose new configurations
- Iterative Refinement: Alternate between evaluation and surrogate updates
- Convergence: Stop when improvement plateaus or budget exhausted
Validation Scope
- Single-Cell Dynamics: Ion channel parameter optimization
- Population-Level Networks: Network connectivity and dynamics tuning
- Incremental Stages: Full neural circuit modeling workflow
- Supercomputing Scale: Validated on HPC systems
Applications
- Computational Neuroscience: Parameter fitting for biophysical models
- Neuromorphic Computing: Hardware parameter optimization
- Scientific Computing: Constrained multi-objective optimization in any domain
- Hyperparameter Optimization: ML model tuning with expensive evaluations
When to Use This Skill
- Optimizing expensive simulation-based models with constraints
- Multi-objective optimization where gradient information is unavailable
- Parameter fitting for biophysical neural models
- Any scenario with expensive evaluations and complex feasibility constraints
Advantages Over Traditional Methods
| Method | Gradient Information | Constraint Handling | Evaluation Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grid Search | No | Hard constraints only | Very poor |
| Bayesian Optimization | No (acquisition) | Soft constraints | Moderate |
| Genetic Algorithms | No | Penalty functions | Poor |
| DMOSOPT | Yes (learned) | Unified with objectives | High |
References
- Paper: Gressmann, F., Raikov, I.G., Kim, S.H., Gazzola, M., Rauchwerger, L. "Joint Surrogate Learning of Objectives, Constraints, and Sensitivities for Efficient Multi-objective Optimization of Neural Dynamical Systems," arXiv:2603.20984, Mar. 2026
- Related: Surrogate modeling, multi-objective optimization, Bayesian optimization, parameter fitting