name: distributed-control-prototyping-framework description: > Prototyping framework for distributed control of multi-robot systems using SPMD (Single Program, Multiple Data) paradigm. Emulates distributed control on a single computer, bridging theory and practical testing. Each core runs the same algorithm with local states and neighbor-to-neighbor communication. Use when: prototyping distributed control algorithms, testing multi-robot coordination, emulating distributed systems on single machine, SPMD paradigm for robotics, distributed optimization validation, or bridge theory-to-practice for multi-agent control. Keywords: SPMD, distributed control, multi-robot, prototyping, emulation, neighbor communication, distributed optimization.
Distributed Control Prototyping Framework
SPMD-based framework for prototyping and testing distributed control algorithms for multi-robot systems on a single computer.
Core Architecture: SPMD Paradigm
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ Core 0 │◄──►│ Core 1 │◄──►│ Core 2 │
│ Robot 0 │ │ Robot 1 │ │ Robot 2 │
│ state₀ │ │ state₁ │ │ state₂ │
└────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ └────┬────┘
└──────────────┼──────────────┘
Neighbor Communication
Design Principles
- Single Program: All cores execute identical control algorithm
- Multiple Data: Each core maintains local state (position, velocity, sensor data)
- Neighbor Communication: Only exchange data with defined neighbors
- Local Decision Making: No global state required
Implementation Patterns
Robot Agent Structure
class DistributedRobot:
def __init__(self, robot_id, neighbors):
self.id = robot_id
self.neighbors = neighbors # IDs of communication neighbors
self.local_state = {} # Position, velocity, sensors
self.boundary_data = {} # Latest data from neighbors
def sense(self):
"""Read local sensors (position, IMU, etc.)"""
pass
def communicate(self):
"""Send local state to neighbors, receive their state"""
pass
def compute_control(self):
"""Compute local control action using local + neighbor data"""
pass
def actuate(self, control):
"""Apply control to local robot"""
pass
def step(self):
self.sense()
self.communicate()
self.compute_control()
self.actuate(control)
Communication Abstraction
# Emulated (single machine, shared memory)
class SharedMemoryBus:
def send(self, sender_id, data):
for receiver_id in neighbors[sender_id]:
buffers[receiver_id][sender_id] = data
def receive(self, receiver_id):
return buffers[receiver_id]
# Hardware (ROS2, DDS, or custom protocol)
class ROS2Communication:
def send(self, sender_id, data):
publisher.publish(data)
def receive(self, receiver_id):
return latest_from_subscriber
Distributed Optimization Algorithms
# Consensus-based coordination
def distributed_consensus(robot, consensus_var, step_size):
"""Distributed average consensus"""
local_val = robot.local_state[consensus_var]
neighbor_vals = robot.boundary_data.get(consensus_var, {})
# Weighted average with neighbors
avg = local_val
for nid, nval in neighbor_vals.items():
avg += step_size * (nval - local_val)
return avg
# Distributed MPC
def distributed_mpc(robot, horizon, neighbor_trajectories):
"""Local MPC with neighbor trajectory predictions"""
predictions = neighbor_trajectories # From communication
# Solve local optimization with collision avoidance constraints
return solve_local_mpc(robot, predictions, horizon)
# Formation control
def distributed_formation(robot, desired_shape, neighbors_state):
"""Maintain formation using only local neighbor info"""
errors = []
for nid, nstate in neighbors_state.items():
desired_rel = desired_shape[robot.id][nid]
actual_rel = nstate.position - robot.local_state.position
errors.append(actual_rel - desired_rel)
return sum(errors)
Framework Workflow
1. Algorithm Development
- Write control algorithm in SPMD style
- Test on emulated framework (single machine)
- Iterate rapidly without hardware
2. Emulation Phase
# Launch emulated multi-robot system
python emulate.py --num-robots 4 --algorithm consensus.py
3. Hardware Deployment
- Same algorithm code, swap communication layer
- Deploy to physical robots
- Minimal code changes required
4. Validation
- Compare emulated vs real trajectories
- Analyze communication latency impact
- Verify convergence properties
Verification Checklist
- Algorithm works in emulated environment
- Communication latency model matches hardware
- Neighbor topology correctly configured
- Local control stability proven
- Network partition handling tested
- Scaling behavior validated (4 → N robots)
Key Advantages
- Rapid prototyping: Test algorithms without hardware
- Same code path: Emulation → deployment with minimal changes
- Scalable testing: Emulate 100+ robots on single machine
- Reproducible: Deterministic emulation for debugging
Related Methods
- See
distributed-quantum-control-systemsfor distributed system patterns - See
density-driven-multi-agent-controlfor multi-agent coordination - See
complex-valued-gnn-controlfor graph-based control