name: qlif-cast-weather-forecasting description: "QLIF-CAST: Quantum Leaky-Integrate-and-Fire methodology for time-series regression (weather forecasting). Hybrid quantum-classical recurrent architecture using single-qubit superpositions for neuron states. Demonstrates 15.4% MSE reduction over classical LIF and 94% faster convergence vs QLSTM/QNN." tags: ["quantum-spiking", "time-series-forecasting", "quantum-machine-learning", "weather-forecasting", "hybrid-quantum-classical"] category: ai_collection
QLIF-CAST: Quantum Leaky-Integrate-and-Fire for Time-Series Forecasting
arXiv: 2605.18333 (May 18, 2026) Authors: Alberto Marchisio, Aayan Ebrahim, Nouhaila Innan, Muhammad Kashif, Muhammad Shafique Category: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Overview
QLIF-CAST extends the Quantum Leaky-Integrate-and-Fire (QLIF) spiking neural network from classification to time-series regression, specifically short-term multivariate weather forecasting. It encodes neuron excitation states as single-qubit quantum superpositions within a hybrid quantum-classical recurrent architecture.
Core Innovation
Quantum Neuron Model
Each QLIF neuron encodes its excitation state as a single-qubit state:
|ψ⟩ = cos(θ/2)|0⟩ + sin(θ/2)|1⟩
- Rx rotation gates: Drive neuron excitation based on input current
- T1 relaxation decay: Models natural decay (leaky behavior)
- Threshold firing: Measurement-based spike generation
Hybrid Architecture
Input → Classical Feature Encoder → QLIF Recurrent Layer → Classical Decoder → Output
(multivariate features) (quantum neuron states) (readout layer)
The QLIF layer sits within a recurrent structure, processing temporal sequences with quantum-enhanced dynamics.
Key Results
Evaluation 1: Weather Forecasting (vs Classical LIF)
| Metric | Classical LIF | QLIF-CAST | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSE | Baseline | 15.4% lower | ↓ 15.4% |
| MAE | Baseline | 4.4% lower | ↓ 4.4% |
Demonstrates quantum neuronal dynamics reduce prediction error over classical equivalents with matched parameters.
Evaluation 2: Cross-Domain Comparison (vs QLSTM, QNN)
| Model | Training Time | Error | Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| QLSTM | 100% (baseline) | Baseline | Standard |
| QNN | ~60% | Higher error | Fast but less accurate |
| QLIF-CAST | 6% (94% reduction) | Competitive | Optimal position |
Hardware Verification
- Executed on IBM Marrakesh (156-qubit QPU)
- Only 1.2% average deviation from simulation
- Confirms reliable circuit execution on real quantum hardware
Methodology
QLIF Neuron Dynamics
- Input Encoding: Multivariate features → rotation angles for Rx gates
- Excitation Update: |ψ(t)⟩ = Rx(input)|ψ(t-1)⟩
- T1 Decay: Natural relaxation toward ground state
- Spike Detection: Measure qubit; spike if |1⟩ probability exceeds threshold
- State Reset: Post-spike reset to ground state
Training
- Hybrid quantum-classical optimization
- Classical parameters: encoder/decoder weights
- Quantum parameters: rotation angles, thresholds
- Loss: MSE for regression tasks
Applications
- Weather forecasting: Short-term multivariate prediction
- Air quality prediction: Cross-domain validation
- Wind speed forecasting: Time-series regression
- General time-series: Any continuous-valued prediction task
Implementation Considerations
# Conceptual QLIF-CAST architecture
class QLIF_CAST:
def __init__(self, n_qubits, n_features):
self.encoder = ClassicalEncoder(n_features, n_qubits)
self.qlif = QLIFRecurrentLayer(n_qubits) # Quantum circuit
self.decoder = ClassicalDecoder(n_qubits)
def forward(self, x):
encoded = self.encoder(x)
quantum_states = self.qlif(encoded)
return self.decoder(quantum_states)
Hardware Requirements
- Quantum backend: IBM Q (156+ qubits recommended)
- Classical co-processor for encoding/decoding
- Hybrid optimization framework (PennyLane, Qiskit)
Comparison with Related Approaches
| Approach | Task Type | Quantum Advantage | Hardware Verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| QLIF (prior) | Classification | Yes | No |
| QLIF-CAST (this work) | Regression | Yes (15.4% MSE) | Yes (IBM Marrakesh) |
| QLSTM | Regression | Moderate | Some |
| QNN | Regression | Limited | Some |
Limitations
- NISQ-era constraints: Limited qubit count and coherence time
- Simulation vs Hardware: 1.2% deviation may grow with larger circuits
- Domain scope: Primarily validated on environmental forecasting
- Scalability: Quantum advantage may diminish with classical hardware improvements
Activation Keywords
- qlif-cast
- quantum leaky integrate fire
- quantum spiking neural network
- quantum time series forecasting
- hybrid quantum classical recurrent
- single qubit neuron
- quantum weather forecasting
- T1 relaxation neuron
- quantum regression
- Rx rotation neuron
Citation
@article{marchisio2026qlifcast,
title={QLIF-CAST: Quantum Leaky-Integrate-and-Fire for Time-Series Weather Forecasting},
author={Marchisio, Alberto and Ebrahim, Aayan and Innan, Nouhaila and Kashif, Muhammad and Shafique, Muhammad},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.18333},
year={2026}
}