multi-scale-hypergraph-brain-connectivity

star 2

Multi-scale hypergraph learning (MuHL) methodology for high-order brain connectivity analysis beyond pairwise GNNs. Accepted to ICML 2026. Use for: brain network analysis, neurodegenerative disease classification (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's), higher-order functional connectivity, hypergraph neural networks.

hiyenwong By hiyenwong schedule Updated 6/4/2026

name: multi-scale-hypergraph-brain-connectivity description: "Multi-scale hypergraph learning (MuHL) methodology for high-order brain connectivity analysis beyond pairwise GNNs. Accepted to ICML 2026. Use for: brain network analysis, neurodegenerative disease classification (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's), higher-order functional connectivity, hypergraph neural networks." license: Complete terms in LICENSE.txt metadata: arxiv_id: "2606.03310" published: "2026-06-03" authors: "Jaeyoon Sim, Soojin Hwang, Seunghun Baek, Guorong Wu, Won Hwa Kim" conference: "ICML 2026" tags: [brain-network, hypergraph, multi-scale, neurodegenerative, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's]

MuHL: Multi-Scale Hypergraph Learning for High-Order Brain Connectivity

Paper: "Learning Multi-Scale Hypergraph for High-Order Brain Connectivity Analysis" (arXiv:2606.03310, ICML 2026) Authors: Jaeyoon Sim, Soojin Hwang, Seunghun Baek, Guorong Wu, Won Hwa Kim

Core Problem

Graph-based models for brain network analysis primarily focus on pairwise interactions (edge = connection between 2 nodes). This misses higher-order dependencies across 3+ brain regions that are critical for understanding neurodegenerative disease progression (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's).

MuHL Methodology

Architecture

  1. Hierarchical Node Feature Construction: Build multi-resolution graph signals at different scales of brain network granularity
  2. Adaptive Multi-Scale Hyperedge Learning: Dynamically construct hyperedges over multi-resolution graph signals (not predefined)
  3. Continuous Hyperedge Construction: Learn hyperedges continuously rather than discrete predefined sets

Key Innovation: Dynamic vs Predefined Hyperedges

Approach Hyperedge Source Flexibility Multi-Resolution
Traditional hypergraphs Predefined (fixed) Low No
Weight-only learning Weights of fixed hyperedges Medium No
MuHL (this work) Learned dynamically High Yes

Technical Details

  • Multi-resolution graph signals: Decompose brain network features at multiple scales
  • Continuous hyperedge construction: Soft assignment of nodes to hyperedges via learnable parameters
  • Hierarchical aggregation: Pool features across scales to capture both local and global patterns

Application Results

  • Alzheimer's Disease classification: Improved performance across different disease stages
  • Parkinson's Disease classification: Consistent improvement over graph-based baselines
  • ROI identification: Learned hyperedges identify key regions and group-wise interactions associated with disease progression

Reusable Patterns

Pattern 1: Higher-Order Connectivity Modeling

When pairwise GNNs underperform on brain network tasks:

1. Construct multi-scale graph representations
2. Learn hyperedges adaptively (not predefined)
3. Aggregate across hyperedge scales hierarchically
4. Identify disease-relevant ROI groups from learned hyperedges

Pattern 2: Multi-Resolution Brain Network Analysis

Input: Brain ROI features + connectivity matrix
├── Scale 1: Fine-grained (individual ROIs)
├── Scale 2: Medium-grained (ROI clusters)
└── Scale 3: Coarse-grained (network modules)
    → Learn hyperedges spanning all scales
    → Hierarchical message passing
    → Disease classification + ROI importance

Comparison with Existing Methods

Method Interaction Order Hyperedge Learning Disease Classification
GCN/GAT Pairwise (2-node) N/A Baseline
Predefined hypergraph Fixed higher-order Weights only Medium
MuHL Adaptive higher-order Full structure learning Best

Pitfalls

  • Predefined hyperedges underutilized: Manually defining hyperedges from known anatomical regions misses dynamic disease-specific patterns. Always learn hyperedges adaptively from data.
  • Scale mismatch: Using single-scale features ignores multi-resolution disease signatures. Construct hierarchical features at fine/medium/coarse granularity.
  • Hyperedge cardinality imbalance: Overly large hyperedges (10+ nodes) dilute signal; overly small (2-3 nodes) revert to pairwise. Balance via learnable cardinality constraints.

Activation

hypergraph brain connectivity, higher-order brain network, multi-scale hypergraph, neurodegenerative disease classification, Alzheimer's GNN, Parkinson's brain network, MuHL, ICML 2026, brain ROI analysis, multi-resolution brain network

Related Skills

  • [[brain-graph-neural]] - Graph neural networks for brain connectivity
  • [[brain-higher-order-structures]] - Higher-order brain network analysis with simplicial complexes
  • [[higher-order-brain-networks]] - Higher-order brain network analysis using topological signatures
  • [[dcho-higher-order-brain-connectivity]] - DCHO higher-order brain connectivity prediction
Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill multi-scale-hypergraph-brain-connectivity
Repository Details
star Stars 2
call_split Forks 0
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator