name: hqnn-blood-cell-classification description: "Hybrid Quantum-Classical Neural Network (HQNN) methodology for medical image classification, specifically blood cell classification. Combines pre-trained classical backbone (ResNet-50) with variational quantum circuit for enhanced feature representation. Use when: (1) medical image classification with limited data, (2) hybrid quantum-classical ML pipeline design, (3) comparing quantum vs classical feature transformations, (4) NISQ-era quantum advantage in medical imaging. Activation: HQNN, hybrid quantum neural network, blood cell classification, quantum medical imaging, variational quantum circuit, ResNet quantum, quantum feature transformation" license: MIT metadata: arxiv_id: "2605.23324" published: "2026-05-22" authors: "Guilherme Cruz, Nouhaila Innan, Alberto Marchisio, Gabriel Falcao, Muhammad Shafique" tags: [quantum, medical, HQNN, classification, blood-cells, variational-circuit]
HQNN Blood Cell Classification
Core Architecture
Modular HQNN architecture combining:
- Classical backbone: Pre-trained ResNet-50 for feature extraction
- Latent bottleneck: Low-dimensional classical projection (reduces to match qubit count)
- Variational quantum circuit: Parameterized quantum gates for feature transformation
- Classical output layer: Final classification
Key Design Patterns
Three-Model Comparison Protocol
To isolate quantum contribution, always evaluate three architectures:
- HQNN: Classical backbone → bottleneck → VQC → classifier
- Classical Matched: Classical backbone → bottleneck → classical nonlinear layer (same capacity as VQC) → classifier
- Baseline: Classical backbone → classifier (no intermediate transformation)
This controls for model capacity and ensures quantum improvements are genuine.
Quantum Circuit Design
- Use angle encoding for classical-to-quantum data mapping
- Strongly entangling layers (e.g., RealAmplitudes or EfficientSU2)
- Keep circuit depth shallow for NISQ compatibility (2-4 layers)
- Measure all qubits in computational basis
Training Strategy
- Freeze backbone during initial VQC training
- End-to-end fine-tuning after VQC converges
- Use parameter-shift rule for quantum gradients
- Shot noise: 1024+ shots per circuit evaluation
Hardware Evaluation
- Test on both simulator (noiseless) and real quantum hardware
- Expect modest degradation on real hardware (~1-3% F1 drop)
- Report both to demonstrate noise robustness
Pitfalls
- Barren plateaus: VQCs with too many qubits/layers suffer from vanishing gradients. Keep qubit count ≤ 10 for medical classification tasks.
- Bottleneck dimension mismatch: Latent space dimension must exactly match qubit count. Use linear projection with appropriate activation.
- Simulation vs hardware gap: Simulators are orders of magnitude faster. Train on simulator, evaluate on hardware for final validation.
- Dataset saturation: On near-saturated benchmarks (e.g., 98%+ accuracy), even small F1 improvements (0.1-0.5%) are statistically meaningful.