name: audit description: Run a corpus-scale, STATS-ONLY PII audit over a folder of session transcripts LOCALLY and produce an aggregate report — counts by type and by layer, the per-session redaction-rate distribution, document lengths, and a coarse residual proxy. Use when the user says "audit my sessions", "scan folder for PII", "how much PII across these transcripts", "PII stats for my corpus", "is my redaction holding at scale", or points at a directory of transcripts and asks how much personal data it contains. Fully local — raw text never leaves the machine; the report carries ZERO PII values, transcript substrings, or filenames (only anonymized own-NN ids and counts), so the aggregates are safe to surface. Run it on a RED (raw) corpus to size the PII, or on a GREEN (already-redacted) corpus to check residual leakage.
confide:audit — corpus-scale, stats-only PII audit
Measure how much PII lives across a whole folder of sessions, without ever exposing any
of it. The audit runs the layered LOCAL detector stack from shared/confide_core.py
(regex → Natasha → local LLM) over each file and emits only aggregates. This mirrors
the real_session_eval privacy contract: read text only in-process, emit counts.
Privacy invariants (do not violate)
- Local-only. No cloud APIs. Raw transcript text never leaves the machine.
- Stats-only output. The report (markdown + json + optional HTML) contains ONLY counts and rates — never a transcript substring, never a detected PII value.
- No filenames. Per-file rows are keyed by anonymized ids
own-00,own-01, … The original path/name is never written or printed. On an unreadable file, only the index + exception class name is recorded. - Safe to surface. Because it is counts-only, the aggregate report can be shared with a cloud agent or pasted into a chat. The PII stays on the machine.
What it reports
n_files, total / mean / min / max document charsspans_by_type(PERSON, EMAIL, PHONE, DATE, …) andspans_by_layer(regex / natasha / llm)overall_redaction_rateplus the per-session redaction-rate distribution (min / median / mean / max)- a coarse residual proxy: spans still detectable after redaction — ~0 on a clean RED corpus, a leakage signal on a GREEN corpus.
Run it
Point it at a folder (recurses, processes every .md/.txt; skips confide's own
*.green.md / *.stats.json outputs):
python3 skills/audit/scripts/audit.py FOLDER
Options:
--list paths.txt— also/instead audit absolute paths listed one per line.--layers regex,natasha,llm— choose detection layers (default from config). Use--layers regexfor a fully offline, deterministic pass (no models/network).--out report.md— report path; areport.jsonsibling is written alongside.--html— also write a Tufte-ish dashboard (report.html, counts only).
Writes the markdown + json report (and optional HTML) and prints the aggregate summary — all counts only.
RED vs GREEN
- RED (raw) corpus: sizes the PII problem before any redaction.
- GREEN (redacted) corpus: the residual proxy and remaining
spans_by_typetell you whether redaction is holding at scale.
After running
- Report the aggregate summary (file count, span totals by type/layer, redaction-rate distribution, residual proxy) — never paste PII.
- If residual is non-trivial on a GREEN corpus, point the user at confide:anon to re-redact and confide:red to probe re-identification risk.
Setup
Layer availability (Natasha, local LLM via Ollama) comes from config — run
confide:setup if they aren't installed. --layers regex always works offline.