sparc

star 2

Entry point for the SPARC feature pipeline — the master-coordinated five-phase walk that drives a SINGLE feature in an EXISTING active system from specification to a completed, independently-verified feature (Specification → Pseudocode → Architecture → Refinement → Completion), the THIRD instance of the AD/AID-PDLC sub-cycle contract (ADR-010 / RFC-016). Dispatches the `sparc-orchestrator` master, which walks the five phases as separate isolated-context agents with a blocking INDEPENDENT quality-gate between each. hook-gate=No: there is NO fail-closed hook — C5 is harness phase-ordering + delegating Refinement to the existing TDD hook-gate (RFC-012) when test-immutability matters. EN: Run SPARC on a single feature in an existing active system — spec → pseudocode → architecture (RFC) → code+tests → completion, with a MANDATORY independent reviewer at every phase gate. Use for one well-scoped feature in an active codebase, NOT a brand-new product from scratch (that is BMAD) or brownfield modernisation (that is

ForgePlan By ForgePlan schedule Updated 6/1/2026

name: sparc description: | Entry point for the SPARC feature pipeline — the master-coordinated five-phase walk that drives a SINGLE feature in an EXISTING active system from specification to a completed, independently-verified feature (Specification → Pseudocode → Architecture → Refinement → Completion), the THIRD instance of the AD/AID-PDLC sub-cycle contract (ADR-010 / RFC-016). Dispatches the sparc-orchestrator master, which walks the five phases as separate isolated-context agents with a blocking INDEPENDENT quality-gate between each. hook-gate=No: there is NO fail-closed hook — C5 is harness phase-ordering + delegating Refinement to the existing TDD hook-gate (RFC-012) when test-immutability matters. EN: Run SPARC on a single feature in an existing active system — spec → pseudocode → architecture (RFC) → code+tests → completion, with a MANDATORY independent reviewer at every phase gate. Use for one well-scoped feature in an active codebase, NOT a brand-new product from scratch (that is BMAD) or brownfield modernisation (that is Strangler Fig). RU: Запусти SPARC на одной фиче в существующей активной системе — spec → pseudocode → architecture (RFC) → код+тесты → completion, с обязательным независимым ревьюером на каждом гейте. Для одной well-scoped фичи в активной кодовой базе, НЕ для нового продукта с нуля (это BMAD) и не для модернизации legacy (это Strangler). Triggers: "sparc", "/sparc", "run sparc", "feature in existing system", "single feature", "spec to completion", "five-phase feature", "sparc pipeline", "запусти sparc", "фича в существующей системе", "проведи фичу через sparc", "spec pseudo arch refine complete"

/sparc — the five-phase feature walk (Specification → Pseudocode → Architecture → Refinement → Completion)

/sparc runs the SPARC methodology as a master-coordinated sub-cycle: the sparc-orchestrator walks one feature from a specification to a completed, verified feature, gating every phase with an independent reviewer. It is the third instance of the AD/AID-PDLC sub-cycle contract (ADR-010); the siblings are /tdd (RFC-012, the Build stage) and /bmad (RFC-013, the greenfield arc). SPARC is the single-feature-in-an-active-system methodology; the five phase agents already exist — the only finished piece is the master (sparc-orchestrator, brought to Profile B-orchestrator canon).

When to use SPARC vs the neighbours

Use… When Primary
/sparc (this) A single, well-scoped feature in an EXISTING active system — spec → completed feature SPARC
/bmad (Row 1) Greenfield — a brand-new product/service, idea → shipped, full Analyst→QA arc BMAD
/smith Row 2 → Strangler Brownfield modernisation of a legacy system Strangler Fig + DDD
/tdd (Row 13) Build-stage test-first enforcement on an existing active SPEC/RFC TDD

If the task is a brand-new product → use /bmad. If it's modernising legacy → route via /smith (Strangler). If it's pure test-first on an already-active SPEC → /tdd. SPARC's Refinement phase may itself delegate to /tdd when the feature is test-critical (the contract composes — instance #3 nests instance #1). The sparc-orchestrator refuses to start when the signal is not a single-feature-in-an-active-system (Precondition C1).

No setup needed (hook-gate=No — the contrast with /bmad)

SPARC has no fail-closed hook, so there is nothing to initialise — no /sparc-init, no stack.json, no per-branch state file. Its enforcement (C5) is the forgeplan harness (phase-ordering: no source/test is dispatched until the Architecture RFC is active) plus delegating Refinement to the existing TDD hook-gate when test-immutability matters. This is the visible payoff of hook-gate=No: a lighter instance than BMAD/TDD.

The contract this runs (ADR-010 C1-C6)

Element In SPARC
C1 Entry A feature scoped against an EXISTING active system; the master refuses otherwise (greenfield → /bmad, brownfield → Strangler, Build-only → /tdd), and won't advance a phase whose input isn't active.
C2 Master sparc-orchestrator (opus, Profile B-orchestrator) — walks the five phases, writes nothing, activates nothing.
C3 Phases specification (Spec) → pseudocode (Pseudo) → adr-architect+architecture (Arch) → refinement+coder (Refine) → evidence-recorder (Completion).
C4 Verifiers mandatory, independent, at EVERY gate: artifact-reviewer/architect-reviewer (Validate-spec); architect-reviewer (+system-dev) (RFC fitness + Pseudocode-absorption); tester+code-reviewer (Refine).
C5 Enforcement hook-gate=No — no hook. Harness phase-ordering + Refinement delegates to the TDD hook-gate (RFC-012).
C6 Exit each gate emits EVIDENCE carrying its C4 verdict + identity; the Completion EVIDENCE is the terminal exit; the orchestrator activates.

Procedure

When /sparc is invoked, the main session runs this:

Step 1 — context + precondition

  1. Snapshot state: forgeplan_health, the active parent PRD/system, git status, and (if Hindsight is wired) memory_recall("project context").
  2. Confirm the task is a single feature in an existing active system. If it's a brand-new product → /bmad; if brownfield → /smith Row 2 (Strangler); if Build-stage test-first only → /tdd. Do not start SPARC otherwise.
  3. Pick the scale tier: MICRO (bug-fix-sized — skip Pseudocode + collapse to a light spec) / STANDARD (a normal feature — all five phases) / SYSTEM (a large feature — all phases + system-dev at the Architecture gate).

Step 2 — orchestrate the five-phase walk (the main session IS the orchestrator)

hook-gate=No (ADR-012) means the main session is the SPARC orchestrator — it dispatches each phase agent and each C4 gate directly (via Task/Agent), following the sparc-orchestrator contract, and activates the EVID + gated artifact between phases. The walk:

specification → [C4 Validate-spec: architect-reviewer] → pseudocode → architecture(+adr-architect)
  → [C4 RFC fitness + Pseudocode-absorption: architect-reviewer (+system-dev)]
  → refinement+coder (delegate to /tdd if test-critical) → [C4 tester + code-reviewer]
  → evidence-recorder (C6)

Every phase receives the FULL accumulated prior-phase output; Profile A/B agents emit NEEDS_ACTIVATION and the main session activates before the next phase's C1.

Do NOT dispatch sparc-orchestrator as a subagent expecting it to run the walk. The platform blocks Task inside subagents, so a dispatched orchestrator cannot spawn the phase agents — it can only verify Precondition C1, return the walk plan, and (correctly) refuse to author/self-certify the work. The sparc-orchestrator agent is the codified walk contract + a discipline guardrail; the executor is the main session (hook-gate=No instances have no dedicated dispatched executor — proven in the RFC-016 dogfood, EVID-165).

Step 3 — walk the gates with the user

The master returns a structured handoff after each phase (or pauses at a gate). The default is ask after each phase — present the gate verdict and the next phase, and let the user confirm or redirect. The user can opt into "run all" for autonomous execution if they trust the plan.

Step 4 — activation duty (orchestrator, not the master)

The master emits NEEDS_ACTIVATION: <ID> after each C4 PASS (Profile-B agents cannot self-activate). The orchestrator (you, the main session) activates the EVID + the gated artifact via forgeplan_activate, then tells the master to advance. On a <<NEED_USER_INPUT>> sentinel (e.g. a gate failed 3×), surface the blocker to the user.

What makes SPARC different from just running the agents by hand

  • Independent review at EVERY gate. Canonical SPARC gates Specification and Architecture with a self-checklist; the instance makes an independent different-context C4 review mandatory at Spec, Arch, and Refine — generator≠verifier at every handoff. This is the methodology's real value, not decoration.
  • Full context accumulation. Every phase receives the FULL output of all prior phases (the master's cardinal rule) — the single biggest determinant of output consistency.
  • Refinement→TDD delegation. When the feature is test-critical, Refinement hands off to the /tdd hook-gate so the tests are independently frozen before GREEN — fail-closed test-immutability without a new hook.
  • Pseudocode's conditional-freeze handled honestly. Pseudocode is a non-freezable intermediate; its C4+C6 are co-located at the Architecture gate (the architect-reviewer certifies the algorithm was carried into the RFC; the Arch-gate EVID pins it under ## Pseudocode-absorption).

Escape hatches (bounded)

  • Scale-tiering is the only "skip". MICRO scope legitimately skips Pseudocode + collapses heavy gates; it does NOT skip the Refine C4 (code is always independently reviewed). There is no fail-closed hook to override (hook-gate=No), so there is no gate-bypass to misuse.

HARD RULES

  1. Single feature in an active system only. Greenfield → /bmad; brownfield → Strangler; Build-only → /tdd. The master refuses otherwise (Precondition C1).
  2. The master coordinates; the phase agents produce; the orchestrator activates. Three roles, never collapsed.
  3. Every phase gate is an independent context (generator≠verifier). The C4 reviews at Spec, Arch, and Refine are mandatory, not optional — this is the upgrade over unenforced SPARC.
  4. No source/test until the Architecture RFC is active. That is SPARC's "no code before design", enforced by phase-ordering (hook-gate=No — no hook).
  5. Pseudocode is non-freezable — its review is co-located at the Architecture gate (## Pseudocode-absorption); never run it as production logic without that certification.

Related

  • sparc-orchestrator agent — the master this skill dispatches (agents/sparc-orchestrator.md).
  • /tdd (RFC-012) — the Build-stage sibling instance; SPARC's Refinement delegates to it for test-immutability.
  • /bmad (RFC-013) — the greenfield sibling; /smith — the master-of-masters router (SPARC is Row 3).
  • RFC-016 (the SPARC instance), ADR-010 (the contract), ADR-012 (the hook-gate → hook-gate=No, no new hook/state).
Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/ForgePlan/marketplace --skill sparc
Repository Details
star Stars 2
call_split Forks 0
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator