name: validate-changes description: Evaluate staged changes using LLM-as-a-Judge before committing effort: medium disable-model-invocation: true
Validate Changes Before Commit
Evaluate staged git changes using the output-evaluator agent to catch issues before committing.
Process
Step 1: Check for Staged Changes
Run git diff --cached --stat to see what's staged. If nothing is staged, inform the user and exit.
Step 2: Get the Full Diff
Run git diff --cached to get the complete diff of all staged changes.
Step 3: Invoke the Evaluator
Use the Task tool to launch the output-evaluator agent with the diff:
Evaluate these staged changes for correctness, completeness, and safety.
Return a JSON verdict with scores and issues.
Changes:
[paste the git diff here]
Step 4: Parse and Act on Verdict
Based on the evaluation result:
If APPROVE:
- Tell the user the changes passed evaluation
- Show the summary and scores
- Ask if they want to proceed with commit
If NEEDS_REVIEW:
- Show all issues found (grouped by severity)
- Show the suggestion from the evaluator
- Ask the user how to proceed:
- Fix issues and re-evaluate
- Commit anyway (acknowledge risks)
- Abort
If REJECT:
- Clearly state the changes were rejected
- Show critical issues that caused rejection
- Do NOT offer to commit anyway
- Suggest specific fixes
Step 5: Commit (if approved)
If user confirms, create the commit using the standard commit flow.
Usage Examples
/validate-changes
Output:
Evaluating 3 staged files...
VERDICT: NEEDS_REVIEW
Scores:
Correctness: 8/10
Completeness: 6/10
Safety: 9/10
Issues Found:
[MEDIUM] src/api/handler.ts:45
Missing error handling for network failures
[LOW] src/utils/format.ts:12
Consider adding input validation
Suggestion: Add try-catch around the fetch call in handler.ts
How would you like to proceed?
1. Fix issues and re-evaluate
2. Commit anyway (1 medium issue)
3. Abort
Cost Awareness
This command invokes an LLM evaluation, which uses API tokens:
- Typical cost: $0.01-0.05 per evaluation (using Haiku)
- Larger diffs: May cost more due to increased token usage
When to Use
- After significant code changes before committing
- When working on unfamiliar parts of the codebase
- For changes that affect security-sensitive code
- Before pushing to shared branches
When to Skip
- Trivial changes (typos, formatting)
- Documentation-only changes
- When you've already manually reviewed thoroughly
- When iterating quickly on a feature branch
Integration with Git Hooks
For automatic evaluation on every commit, see pre-commit-evaluator.sh hook.
This command is the manual alternative when you want control over when evaluation runs.