name: skill-capture description: Captures and formalizes reusable knowledge, methods, or lessons from the current conversation. Trigger when the user signals a solution was difficult, expresses a desire to remember a workflow, highlights a "useful" finding, or asks to consolidate insights (e.g., "what did we learn?"). Also trigger when an agent discovers implicit conventions, formatting rules, or undocumented constraints during artifact creation or troubleshooting. Use to convert ad-hoc problem-solving into structured, reusable skills.
Skill Learning
Detect, evaluate, and suggest reusable method candidates that emerge from active work. Turns implicit expertise used during a task into explicit, shared organizational knowledge.
When to Use This Skill
- After completing a complex multi-step task that required novel reasoning
- During retrospectives on effort-heavy investigations or implementations
- When the same method pattern appears across multiple tasks
- When evaluating whether a workflow should be formalized as a skill
- Periodically, to audit accumulated context for extraction opportunities
Methodology
Phase 1: Context Mining
Scan the current working context for repeatable method patterns. Look for:
| Signal | What It Indicates |
|---|---|
| Multi-step reasoning applied to solve a problem | Potential methodology skill |
| Decision tree or heuristic constructed ad-hoc | Potential decision framework skill |
| Checklist mentally followed during a task | Potential validation/quality skill |
| Same approach used across 2+ different tasks | High-value extraction candidate |
| Complex domain knowledge synthesized from research | Potential reference/guide skill |
| Effort-heavy investigation with transferable findings | Knowledge worth preserving |
Output: A list of 1-5 skill candidates, each described in one sentence.
Phase 2: Duplicate Check
For each candidate, verify it doesn't already exist:
- Compare candidate name against existing skill names (exact and synonym match)
- Compare candidate purpose against existing skill descriptions (semantic overlap)
- Check if an existing skill partially covers the candidate's scope
Decision table:
| Finding | Action |
|---|---|
| Exact name match exists | ❌ Drop — already exists |
| Description overlap > 70% with existing skill | ❌ Drop — already covered |
| Partial overlap (30-70%) with existing skill | ⚠️ Flag as potential extension to existing skill |
| No meaningful overlap | ✅ Proceed to evaluation |
IMPORTANT: Do NOT load full skill files during this phase — compare names and descriptions only. Full skill loading wastes context budget when most candidates will be filtered out.
Phase 3: Candidate Evaluation
Score each surviving candidate on three dimensions:
3a. Effort Capitalization
How much effort was spent discovering/applying this method?
| Effort Level | Score | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| High | 3 | Multi-step investigation, research, trial-and-error, >30 min equivalent |
| Medium | 2 | Structured reasoning, some research, 10-30 min equivalent |
| Low | 1 | Quick application of known patterns, <10 min equivalent |
Higher effort = more value in capturing it so it's not repeated.
3b. Usage Frequency
How often would this skill be applied across future tasks?
| Frequency | Score | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Recurring | 3 | Applies to a common task type (testing, debugging, reviewing, etc.) |
| Periodic | 2 | Applies to tasks that occur regularly but not frequently |
| Rare | 1 | Applies to niche or one-off scenarios |
3c. Portability
How many different agents/contexts could benefit?
| Portability | Score | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Universal | 3 | Any agent could use this method |
| Multi-agent | 2 | 2-3 specific agent types would benefit |
| Single-agent | 1 | Only useful for one specific agent type |
Scoring Decision
| Total Score (3-9) | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| 7-9 | ✅ Learn — High-value skill worth creating |
| 4-6 | ⚠️ Consider — Useful but weigh against skill count overhead |
| 1-3 | ❌ Skip — Not worth formalizing |
Phase 4: User Presentation
Present evaluated candidates to the user for confirmation. Apply prompt-interaction-design patterns:
For 1-3 candidates: Yes/No per candidate with evaluation summary
**Skill Candidates Detected**
Based on the work done, these methods could be extracted as reusable skills:
1. **{Candidate Name}** — {one-line purpose}
- Effort: {High|Medium|Low} | Frequency: {Recurring|Periodic|Rare} | Portability: {Universal|Multi|Single}
- Score: {N}/9 → {Learn|Consider|Skip}
- Create this skill? **Yes / No**
2. **{Candidate Name}** — {one-line purpose}
...
For 4+ candidates: Multi-select checklist
**Skill Candidates Detected**
Select which skills to create:
- [ ] **{Candidate Name}** (score {N}/9) — {one-line purpose}
- [ ] **{Candidate Name}** (score {N}/9) — {one-line purpose}
- [ ] **{Candidate Name}** (score {N}/9) — {one-line purpose}
- [ ] **{Candidate Name}** (score {N}/9) — {one-line purpose}
For candidates flagged as extensions: Suggest extending instead of creating
- **{Candidate Name}** — overlaps with existing `{skill-name}` skill
- Recommendation: Extend `{skill-name}` rather than creating new skill
- Extend? **Yes / No**
Anti-Patterns
- ❌ Premature extraction — Creating a skill after seeing a pattern once. Wait for the second occurrence or high effort capitalization score.
- ❌ Full skill loading during duplicate check — Wastes context budget. Names and descriptions are sufficient for Phase 2.
- ❌ Kitchen-sink skills — Bundling unrelated methods into one skill because they came from the same task. Each skill should teach one cohesive method.
- ❌ Agent-specific skills — Extracting a method only one agent would ever use. That belongs inline in the agent, not as a skill.
- ❌ Skipping user confirmation — Always present candidates for approval before creating skill files.
- ❌ Manual registry updates — Searching for or updating a skill catalog after creating a skill. There is no skill registry. Skills are auto-discovered by VS Code's native progressive disclosure: the
<skill>tags in system context are populated from.github/skills/*/SKILL.mdfrontmatter at runtime. Creating the file in the right directory is the only registration step. - ✅ Effort-aware extraction — Prioritize capturing methods that required significant effort to discover, even if usage frequency is moderate.