By name: dispute-game-investigator description: Investigate an OP Stack fault dispute game during (or after) an incident — answer the user's questions and diagnose: why a challenger is disagreeing, doing a lot of moves, or contradicting itself; whether a proposal is valid; which op-node is at fault; and (after the fact) who wins the bonds. Read-only.
Dispute Game Investigator
When to Use
- During an incident, to answer questions and diagnose: a challenger disagreeing with a proposal or another challenger, performing many moves, or contradicting itself; whether the in-progress proposals are valid; which op-node is responsible.
- After the fact, for specifics like the bond outcome.
How to use it
Answer the user's actual question using only the relevant parts of the guide — you do
not need to run every step. Triage first (which game(s)? whose node? valid or not?) and pull
in only what bears on the question; some parts are situational (e.g. the bond outcome in §7 is
usually a post-incident question, not live triage). For a full end-to-end written analysis,
use the dispute-game-investigator agent instead.
Read-only: investigate and explain; never make moves, resolve, fund, or restart a challenger.
Guide
@docs/ai/dispute-game-investigation.md
Tooling
op-challenger list-games/list-claims --format json— enumerate games/claims.op-chain-ops/cmd/check-output-rootandcheck-super-root— canonical output root (EL-only, work against public nodes).op-challenger/scripts/game-proposal-outputs.sh— per-gameoutputAtBlock+safeHeadAtL1Blockfrom a node (spots an incomplete safe-head DB).op-challenger/scripts/check-game-block-hashes.sh— block-hash cross-check, node vs reference.