detect-scope

star 4.0k

Detects user request intent, identifies target plugin/module, loads relevant code context, and asks minimal informed questions before proceeding to intake.

erxes By erxes schedule Updated 5/29/2026

name: detect-scope description: Detects user request intent, identifies target plugin/module, loads relevant code context, and asks minimal informed questions before proceeding to intake.

Skill: Detect Scope

When to Use

ALWAYS use this skill immediately after assemble-context and BEFORE intake.

This skill runs silent discovery on the user's request so that subsequent questions are informed, precise, and don't waste time on obvious matters.

Workflow

Step 1: Parse User Request

Analyze the raw request for:

  • Action type: create | modify | fix | delete | improve | create-new-plugin
  • Target entity: posts, deals, tasks, tickets, tags, etc.
  • Scope hints: UI elements (page, table, form, button) → frontend; data/schema/model → backend; "new feature" → both
  • Plugin hints: direct mentions (sales, content, operation, frontline, etc.)

Step 2: Search Feature Map

Search .agents/maps/feature-map.yaml for exact or fuzzy matches:

# Search by keywords
grep -i "keyword" .agents/maps/feature-map.yaml

# Search by plugin name
grep -i "plugin: {plugin}_ui" .agents/maps/feature-map.yaml

If exact match found:

  • Extract plugin, module, components, routes, entities
  • Note whether frontend/backend/both exists in the mapping

If no match found:

  • Infer plugin from keywords or ask user directly: "Which plugin area does this belong to?"
  • Mark scope as needs-clarification

Step 3: Determine Action Classification

Request Pattern Classification Auto-detected Scope
"Add/create new X" create Usually frontend + backend
"Fix X" / "X is broken" fix Minimal (wherever bug manifests)
"X looks bad / UI issue" fix Frontend only
"X is slow / timeout" fix Backend only
"Update/improve X" modify Frontend + Backend
"Remove/delete X" delete Frontend + Backend
"Build new plugin for X" create-new-plugin Full scaffold

Step 4: Load Plugin Context

Read plugin AGENTS.md if exists:

test -f frontend/plugins/{plugin}_ui/AGENTS.md && cat frontend/plugins/{plugin}_ui/AGENTS.md
test -f backend/plugins/{plugin}_api/AGENTS.md && cat backend/plugins/{plugin}_api/AGENTS.md

Explore plugin structure:

# Frontend plugin modules
ls frontend/plugins/{plugin}_ui/src/modules/ 2>/dev/null || echo "No frontend plugin"

# Backend plugin modules
ls backend/plugins/{plugin}_api/src/ 2>/dev/null || echo "No backend plugin"

Find similar existing implementations:

# Find existing RecordTable, Form, or page in same plugin
grep -r "RecordTable" frontend/plugins/{plugin}_ui/src/modules/{module}/ --include="*.tsx" -l 2>/dev/null | head -5

# Find existing GraphQL operations
grep -r "gql\|graphql" backend/plugins/{plugin}_api/src/ --include="*.ts" -l 2>/dev/null | head -5

Step 5: Build Preliminary Scope

Synthesize findings into:

Detected Scope:
  Plugin: {plugin_name}
  Module: {module_name}
  Action: {create|modify|fix|delete|create-new-plugin}
  Scope: {frontend|backend|both}
  Existing Components: [...]
  Similar Implementations: [...]

Step 6: Ask Minimal Informed Questions

DO NOT ask:

  • "Which plugin?" (already detected)
  • "Frontend or backend?" (already inferred)
  • "What components do you need?" (we know the patterns)

DO ask:

  1. Scope Confirmation (1 sentence):

    I'll {action} {feature} in the {plugin} plugin ({module} module). 
    Scope: {frontend/backend/both}. Is this correct?
    
  2. Goal Condition (1 question):

    What does "done" look like for you? Any specific behavior, design, or constraint I should know?
    
  3. Reference Preference (optional, if similar implementations exist):

    I found {similar_feature} in the same plugin. Should I model this after it?
    

If detection was uncertain, ask ONE clarifying question:

I detected {plugin}/{module}, but I'm not certain. Is this correct, or did you mean {alternative}?

Step 7: Hand Off to Intake

Once user confirms scope and provides goal conditions:

  1. Pass detected scope to intake skill:

    • plugin: confirmed plugin
    • module: confirmed module
    • action: create|modify|fix|delete|create-new-plugin
    • scope: frontend|backend|both
    • goal_condition: user's answer about "done"
    • similar_impl: reference implementation path (if found)
  2. The intake skill will then build the component checklist without asking redundant questions.

Examples

Example 1: Clear Request

User: "Add tags to posts"

LLM (detect-scope):

  1. Parse: action=create, entity=tags, hints=posts (content plugin)
  2. Feature map: matches tags domain=content, module=cms/tags
  3. Classification: create → scope=both
  4. Load context:
    • Read frontend/plugins/content_ui/AGENTS.md (if exists)
    • List frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/cms/ contents
    • Find similar: categories module has CategoriesRecordTable, CategoryForm
  5. Ask:
    I'll add tags to the content plugin (cms/tags module). Scope: frontend + backend. Is this correct?
    
    What does "done" look like? (e.g., tag management page, tag selector in post form, both?)
    
    I found the categories feature as a similar implementation. Should I model tags after it?
    

User: "Yes, and yes model after categories. I need a tag page and selector in post form."

LLM: Proceeds to intake with confirmed scope.

Example 2: Fix Request

User: "Fix deal pipeline board - cards not dragging"

LLM (detect-scope):

  1. Parse: action=fix, entity=pipeline board, hints=deal (sales plugin)
  2. Feature map: matches pipelines domain=sales, module=pipelines
  3. Classification: fix → scope=frontend (UI issue: "not dragging")
  4. Load context:
    • Read frontend/plugins/sales_ui/AGENTS.md
    • Find PipelineBoard component
    • Check drag-and-drop library usage
  5. Ask:
    I'll fix the deal pipeline board drag-and-drop in the sales plugin. Scope: frontend only. Is this correct?
    
    What does "fixed" look like? Smooth drag-and-drop between stages, or specific edge case?
    

Example 3: New Plugin Request

User: "Build a warehouse plugin for inventory management"

LLM (detect-scope):

  1. Parse: action=create-new-plugin, entity=warehouse/inventory
  2. Feature map: no match for "warehouse"
  3. Classification: create-new-plugin
  4. Check manifest: no warehouse plugin exists
  5. Ask:
    I'll create a new "warehouse" plugin for inventory management. This will scaffold both frontend (warehouse_ui) and backend (warehouse_api). Is this correct?
    
    What does "done" look like? (e.g., basic CRUD for products, stock tracking, warehouse locations?)
    

Example 4: Ambiguous Request

User: "Add custom fields to products"

LLM (detect-scope):

  1. Parse: action=create, entity=custom fields, hints=products (sales plugin)
  2. Feature map: custom_fields domain=content (not sales!)
  3. Classification: modify (adding to existing entity)
  4. Ask:
    I detected custom fields for the content plugin (custom fields are managed centrally and applied to products via config). Is this correct, or do you want product-specific custom fields in the sales plugin?
    

Important Rules

  1. ALWAYS search feature-map first - don't guess the plugin
  2. ALWAYS read plugin AGENTS.md if it exists
  3. ALWAYS find similar implementations in the same plugin before asking questions
  4. NEVER ask more than 3 questions - detection should handle the rest
  5. NEVER start coding - hand off to intake after confirmation
  6. If creating a new plugin, check manifest registry and confirm the name doesn't exist
  7. Pass all context to intake so it can build checklist immediately

Output Format

When handing off to intake, provide:

detected_scope:
  plugin: "content"
  module: "cms/tags"
  action: "create"
  scope: "both"
  frontend_plugin: "content_ui"
  backend_plugin: "content_api"
  existing_similar:
    - plugin: "content"
      module: "cms/categories"
      components: ["CategoriesRecordTable", "CategoryForm"]
  goal_condition: "User wants tag management page + tag selector in post form"
  user_confirmed: true

CRITICAL: Write State File

detect-scope MUST write its output to: .agents/state/last-detect-scope.json

This file is validated by the pre-flight check script before intake can run.

Example state file:

{
  "plugin": "content",
  "module": "cms/tags",
  "action": "create",
  "scope": "both",
  "frontend_plugin": "content_ui",
  "backend_plugin": "content_api",
  "existing_similar": [
    {
      "plugin": "content",
      "module": "cms/categories",
      "components": ["CategoriesRecordTable", "CategoryForm"]
    }
  ],
  "goal_condition": "Tag management page + tag selector in post form",
  "user_confirmed": true,
  "timestamp": "2026-05-29T12:00:00Z"
}

Without this file, intake will FAIL the pre-flight check and cannot proceed.

Related Skills

  • assemble-context - Must run before this skill
  • intake - Receives output from this skill
  • create-plugin - Used when action=create-new-plugin
  • plugin-workflow - Used after intake for execution
Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/erxes/erxes --skill detect-scope
Repository Details
star Stars 4,001
call_split Forks 1,285
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator