resolve-cycles

star 4

CFAR rationality technique using 5-minute time-boxed problem-solving to break through procrastination and analysis paralysis. Use when the user: (1) is overthinking and needs to just try solving something, (2) is stuck in analysis paralysis, (3) needs permission to attempt something imperfect, (4) wants to build problem-solving momentum, or (5) has a "bug" (life problem) that might be solvable with focused effort. Triggers: "resolve cycle", "just try it", "5 minutes", "stop overthinking", "analysis paralysis", "stuck", "procrastinating", "yoda timer", "bug hunt", "CFAR".

EquiStamp By EquiStamp schedule Updated 2/5/2026

name: resolve-cycles description: > CFAR rationality technique using 5-minute time-boxed problem-solving to break through procrastination and analysis paralysis. Use when the user: (1) is overthinking and needs to just try solving something, (2) is stuck in analysis paralysis, (3) needs permission to attempt something imperfect, (4) wants to build problem-solving momentum, or (5) has a "bug" (life problem) that might be solvable with focused effort. Triggers: "resolve cycle", "just try it", "5 minutes", "stop overthinking", "analysis paralysis", "stuck", "procrastinating", "yoda timer", "bug hunt", "CFAR".

Resolve Cycles

A CFAR technique using 5-minute time-boxed problem-solving to break through inertia. Deceptively simple but empirically effective: set a timer, actually solve the problem, stop.

Three Modes

  1. Design Mode — Help identify which problems ("bugs") are good candidates for resolve cycles
  2. Practice Mode — Run a resolve cycle on a low-stakes practice problem
  3. Execute Mode — Facilitate a real resolve cycle on an active stuck point

Why It Works

Most procrastination isn't laziness — it's activation energy. People optimize for the appearance of trying rather than the reality of solving. Resolve Cycles strip away this appearance-management:

  • 5 minutes is "safe" — low psychological cost to invest
  • Bounded urgency — creates deadline pressure without excess demand
  • Permission to succeed — explicitly gives permission to actually solve the problem
  • No meta-cognition — the ticking clock eliminates second-guessing

Core Process

Cycle 1: Solve It

  1. Identify the bug: Any problem worth improving
  2. Set a real timer: 5 minutes, audible alarm (important — don't use silent timers)
  3. Start immediately: Don't prepare, brief, or explain. Just start.
  4. Actually solve: Focus exclusively on solving until the timer sounds

Cycle 2: Plan It (if Cycle 1 didn't fully solve)

If incomplete, spend another 5 minutes creating an actionable plan where each step fits into a 5-minute resolve cycle.

Facilitation Approach

  • Permission-giving: "You have 5 minutes to solve this. Go."
  • Narrative reframing (if stuck): "What if you'd receive a billion dollars for solving this in 5 minutes?"
  • Strip appearance: "The goal is solving, not looking productive."
  • Frequency limit: Don't do more than one per hour — loses potency with overuse.

When to Use vs. Not

Good for: Getting unstuck, building momentum, small-to-medium problems, breaking analysis paralysis, procrastination on implementable tasks, situations where the blocker is permission rather than capability.

Not good for: Huge structural problems (use Goal Factoring to break down first), information-gathering (you genuinely lack knowledge), emotional blocks (use Focusing or IDC), complex multi-stakeholder decisions.

Practice Exercise: Bug Hunt + Resolve

  1. List 5 "bugs" in your life (anything that could be better)
  2. Pick one that's medium-sized (not trivial, not massive)
  3. Set 5-minute timer
  4. Solve it
  5. Debrief: What surprised you? Was it easier than expected?

Common Failure Patterns

  • Over-ambition: Choosing bugs that genuinely need 30+ min. Start medium.
  • Weak timer: Use an audible alarm you can't dismiss
  • Pre-planning: Strategizing instead of starting. Just start.
  • Performance anxiety: Frame as "just try for 5 min," not "prove yourself"
  • Overuse: Max one per hour for sustained effectiveness

Integration

  • Goal Factoring: Break large problems into resolve-cycle-sized pieces
  • TAPs: Set up resolve cycles as responses to specific procrastination triggers
  • Hamming Questions: Use Hamming to identify which bugs matter most, then resolve cycle them
  • Murphyjitsu: After solving, stress-test the solution
Install via CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/EquiStamp/CFAR-Claude-Skills --skill resolve-cycles
Repository Details
star Stars 4
call_split Forks 1
navigation Branch main
article Path SKILL.md
More from Creator