audit

name: audit description: On-demand audit. Target quick runs the mechanical scan.sh only (zero-LLM drift check). Target documents scans docs + agent instructions + memory + session drift via the rpm:auditor review agent. Target project runs a full consultant review — code, architecture, inward + outward research, 7-dimension analysis, saved plan file. Routine doc-drift is handled automatically by /session-end — run audit only when you have a specific concern. disable-model-invocation: true argument-hint: "quick | documents | project" allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Glob Grep Agent WebSearch

/audit

On-demand audits. Three distinct targets, no depth menu, no recency recommendation. Routine doc-drift is handled automatically by /session-end — run /audit only when you have a specific concern that warrants a deeper look.

Project Amendments

At the start of every invocation, check whether docs/rpm/skills/audit.md exists in the consuming project. If it does, read it and apply its contents as additional project-specific instructions for this skill. Amendments may add audit dimensions, require extra scans, or extend the report format. They cannot remove or override plugin defaults — on conflict, this SKILL.md wins.

Routing

Parse $ARGUMENTS:

• quick → run the Quick audit below (mechanical scan.sh only, no LLM scan)

• documents (or docs) → run the Documents audit below

• project → run the Project audit described in project-mode.md. Read that file and follow it end-to-end — it contains the full 5-phase protocol, the analyze dimensions, and the deliverables spec.

• empty or unrecognized → print the usage block and stop:

  ## /audit — pick a target
  
  - `/audit quick` — mechanical scan.sh only. Git state,
    agent instructions size, NOT_IMPLEMENTED, broken refs,
    daily-log gap, session marker, spec inventory drift,
    log/tracker staleness.
    Zero LLM tokens for the scan itself. ~5sec.
  - `/audit documents` — scan docs + agent instructions + memory +
    session drift via the rpm:auditor review agent. Scored findings,
    codify repeat offenders. ~3min.
  - `/audit project` — full consultant review: code, architecture,
    inward + outward research, 7-dimension analysis, saved plan file.
    ~30min+.
  
  Routine doc-drift runs automatically at /session-end.
  

Target: Quick

Mechanical drift scan only — no rpm:auditor subagent, no LLM scan, no 110-doc walk. Runs skills/session-end/scripts/scan.sh via direct shell injection and interprets the output.

Use when you want a fast "anything broken right now?" check between session-ends, or to verify a fix landed, without committing to a full documents audit.

Phase 1: Scan (auto-injected, no tool call needed)

The scan.sh output below was produced by the shell before this skill body reached you. Its results are already in this message — do NOT re-run these checks as tool calls.

!bash "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/session-end/scripts/scan.sh"

Interpret the sections exactly as skills/session-end/SKILL.md Phase 1a describes — the interpretation rules are identical.

Phase 2: Assemble findings

From the scan output, collect actionable items into a findings list:

• git — only flag if the user seems unaware of uncommitted work
• agent_instructions — flag if status=warn or status=critical (fall back to legacy claude_md only if agent_instructions is absent from older scan output)
• not_implemented — flag only real source stubs, suppress meta
• broken_refs — always flag if count > 0
• daily_log — flag if today_exists=false AND commits_since > 0
• session_marker — informational, not a finding
• specs_inventory — flag if unlisted > 0
• pm_docs_staleness — flag if any days > 3
• migration — if count > 0, auto-migrate before presenting findings: mkdir -p target dirs, mv each move=old→new pair, git add both old and new paths. This is safe and non-destructive (git tracks the rename). Print a brief summary of what was moved.

Phase 3: Present findings menu

Present via the Shared Findings Menu format described in findings-menu.md. Read that file for the exact format, reply grammar, and execute flow.

Score each finding with severity (0-40) + evidence (0-30) + fix clarity (0-30). For scan.sh findings, evidence is generally "single clear source" (20) since the scan is mechanical.

If no findings, print:

## /audit quick — no drift detected

and stop. Do NOT append to past/log.md for clean runs — quick mode is meant to be cheap and invisible when nothing's wrong.

Phase 4: Log results (only if findings were present)

Append a one-line run marker to docs/rpm/past/log.md Audit History: - YYYY-MM-DD — audit quick — N findings, M fixed, K skipped

No findings detail beneath — keep quick mode's log footprint minimal. If the user wants detail, they can re-run or upgrade to /audit documents.

Target: Documents

Scan docs, agent instructions, memory files, trackers, and recent session logs for drift. Runs via the rpm:auditor review agent when the current runtime can dispatch one. Scored, confidence-gated, codifies repeat offenders.

Phase 1: Dispatch (review agent)

Launch the rpm:auditor review agent using the current runtime's agent mechanism. In Claude Code, use the Agent tool with subagent_type: "rpm:auditor" and run_in_background: true, then return immediately. In runtimes without a compatible background-agent notification path, run the same auditor protocol synchronously in the main session. The scan spec lives in agents/auditor.md (or the Codex reference copy) — do not duplicate it here.

In the same response, surface a one-line dispatch confirmation to the user (audit: dispatched rpm:auditor in background — results will appear when ready) and stop. Do NOT invent findings or guess at outcomes.

When the runtime reports the agent result, re-enter the skill at Phase 2 with the report content. For Claude Code task notifications, read the output via the file referenced in the <output-file> tag.

Phase 2: Score findings, present menu

When the agent completes, score each finding:

Confidence = severity (0-40) + evidence strength (0-30) + fix clarity (0-30)

• Severity: Critical=40, High=30, Medium=20, Low=10
• Evidence: multiple sources=30, single clear source=20, inferred=10
• Fix clarity: exact steps known=30, direction clear=20, needs investigation=10

Only present findings scoring ≥ 60. Below that, log to past/log.md but don't bother the user.

Present findings (sorted by score, highest first) using the Shared Findings Menu format described in findings-menu.md. Read that file for the exact format, reply grammar, and execute flow.

Below the menu, note any low-confidence findings that were suppressed: (N low-confidence findings logged but not shown).

Phase 3: Post-execute — codify repeat findings

After the menu's Execute step completes, for each ✓ fix, scan docs/rpm/past/log.md Audit History for thematically-similar prior findings. If this drift has appeared 2+ times across audits, the mechanical fix isn't enough — propose a structural follow-up so it stops recurring.

Pick the intervention by finding type — not always a hook. Often the right answer is just guidance:

Propose one concrete intervention per repeat finding — name the exact file you'd create or edit and what the change is. Wait for confirmation before applying.

Hookify rule format (only for the PreToolUse-hook case):

---
name: {descriptive-name}
enabled: true
hook_type: PreToolUse
matcher: "{tool pattern}"
---

{What this rule enforces and why}

## Conditions
- {condition}: {pattern}

## Action
deny with message: "{explanation}"

For non-hook interventions, edit the target file directly — no hookify file is created.

Phase 4: Log results

After the Execute step (or a cancelled run):

• Append a one-line run marker to docs/rpm/past/log.md Audit History: - YYYY-MM-DD — audit documents — N findings, M fixed, K skipped (cancelled runs: N findings, cancelled)
• Append findings detail below the marker
• Add one-liner to docs/rpm/context.md Prior Findings table
• Update Sessions Reviewed table if session drift was checked

Target: Project

Full consultant review with external research. You are NOT an expert in this project's domain — investigate before judging.

The full 5-phase protocol is in project-mode.md. Read it in full and follow it end-to-end. It contains:

• Phase 1: Investigate (including background rpm:auditor scan for Phase 4 evidence)
• Phase 2: Inward Research (validate against authoritative sources)
• Phase 3: Outward Research (competitive analysis — REQUIRED)
• Phase 4: Analyze across 7 dimensions
• Phase 5: Ask questions and refine
• Deliverables (executive summary + docs/rpm/past/log.md entry + docs/rpm/reviews/YYYY-MM-DD-plan.md + docs/rpm/reviews/YYYY-MM-DD.md)

Do not skip phases. Outward research is required, not optional — without it you over-index on "does the project match its own spec?" and miss whether the spec itself is best-in-class.